Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Евро-Футбол

Channel

Евро-Футбол

@euro_fo0tbal

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,372subscribers

-934 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001303525361
TypeChannel
Username@euro_fo0tbal
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/euro_fo0tbal

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Previous handles

@euro_fo0tbal was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.

@euro_fo0tba
held 7 August 20267 August 2026

Growth

1018,3069,1587 August 2026 — 18,306 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,306 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,297 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,280 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,255 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,241 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,208 subscribers13 August 2026 — 18,177 subscribers14 August 2026 — 18,129 subscribers16 August 2026 — 18,102 subscribers17 August 2026 — 18,065 subscribers18 August 2026 — 18,050 subscribers19 August 2026 — 18,002 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,984 subscribers21 August 2026 — 17,948 subscribers23 August 2026 — 17,906 subscribers24 August 2026 — 17,866 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,838 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,811 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,788 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,755 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,730 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,706 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,699 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10 subscribers31 August 2026 — 17,678 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,655 subscribers2 September 2026 — 17,630 subscribers3 September 2026 — 17,595 subscribers6 September 2026 — 17,550 subscribers9 September 2026 — 17,487 subscribers11 September 2026 — 17,436 subscribers13 September 2026 — 17,398 subscribers15 September 2026 — 17,352 subscribers17 September 2026 — 17,372 subscribers17,3727 August 202617 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 41 days, net -934. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 06:5417,372+20
15 Sept 2026, 06:2017,352-46
13 Sept 2026, 12:5917,398-38
11 Sept 2026, 19:4117,436-51
9 Sept 2026, 10:4117,487-63
6 Sept 2026, 05:5717,550-45
3 Sept 2026, 20:3917,595-35
2 Sept 2026, 14:1917,630-25
1 Sept 2026, 17:3317,655-23
31 Aug 2026, 19:0417,678+17,668
31 Aug 2026, 01:0510-17,689
30 Aug 2026, 21:0417,699-7
30 Aug 2026, 15:3117,706-24
30 Aug 2026, 03:2517,730-25
29 Aug 2026, 00:1317,755-33
27 Aug 2026, 23:3417,788-23
27 Aug 2026, 01:3917,811-27
25 Aug 2026, 22:3317,838-28
24 Aug 2026, 22:0317,866-40
23 Aug 2026, 04:3817,906first reading

Engagement

265 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.4%
avg views ÷ 17,372 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,160
124 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
124
of 265 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 118 of 124 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held265 (4 August 20263 September 2026)
Views total267,283
Reactions total2,984
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 09:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 15s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

9,008 reactions across 255 posts, in 41 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3,65540.6%
🔥8479.40%
🤣8139.03%
🤡6266.95%
👎5205.77%
🕊4214.67%
😁4214.67%
😢3604.00%
❤‍🔥2232.48%
👏2172.41%
🙏1391.54%
👍1231.37%
👌941.04%
🤬830.921%
🤮630.699%
😭580.644%
💔570.633%
💩550.611%
🤨520.577%
😱510.566%
21 further kinds1301.44%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 256 of the 265 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,008 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 265 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 265 we hold a reading for · 0.8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @euro_fo0tbal. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 265 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 07:46 UTC770 views20 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🇪🇸Легенда в «Барсе»😎

20

3 Sept 2026, 05:05 UTC≈1,550 views24 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

❌🇪🇸 АЛЬВАРЕС И «БАРСА» НАВСЕГДА ВСЁ! ✨🇪🇸 Кроме суммы отступных €500 млн, «Атлетико» ничего не переубедит ❗️ Но если «Барселона» вдруг СВЯЖЕТСЯ с аргентинцем до любого матча, как это было перед ответными играми в ЛЧ и Кубке Испании — «Атлетико» подаст ЖАЛОБУ

10🤬9🤣5

3 Sept 2026, 03:38 UTC≈1,900 views27 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Мбаппе хотели похитить😳

22😁4🍌1

2 Sept 2026, 17:32 UTC≈2,370 views34 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🇪🇸Травмированные игроки «Реала» на матч с «Интером»😳

18😢10😁5🍌1

2 Sept 2026, 11:04 UTC≈2,610 views66 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🇪🇸Фанаты «Барсы» так этого ждали💔😥

🕊49🤣6💔4🤡3💘2❤‍🔥1😁1

2 Sept 2026, 09:41 UTC≈2,650 views36 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

🇪🇸Хотели Альвареса🤣

25😁10🤬1

2 Sept 2026, 07:18 UTC≈2,670 views46 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🇪🇸Как изменилась атака «Барсы»😳

38🤣8

2 Sept 2026, 03:39 UTC≈2,740 views53 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Легенда как всегда 💪🏻🤣

😁467

1 Sept 2026, 19:00 UTC≈2,820 views69 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🇪🇸Заиграет в «Барсе»?😳

👍45😭9💩8🤣42💯1

1 Sept 2026, 18:32 UTC≈2,730 views46 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Что если…😳

34👎11😈1

1 Sept 2026, 15:58 UTC≈2,700 views17 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Рекордные трансферы «Манчестер Сити»: 146 млн евро - Энцо Фернандес 135 млн евро - Эллиот Андерсон 117 млн евро - Джэк Грилиш 95 млн евро - Аюб Буадди 90 млн евро - Йошко Гвардиол «Горожане» оформили сразу три рекордные сделки за это лето!

14🤣2💯1

1 Sept 2026, 12:33 UTC≈2,680 views20 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🤏 Энцо Фернандес очень близок к тому, чтобы стать игроком «Манчестер Сити» – Gastón Edul

🔥15🤡5

Showing the 12 most recent of 265 posts we hold for @euro_fo0tbal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Aug 2026, 17:59 UTCAnonymous Poll263 voters

⚽️Кто сегодня одержит победу?

  1. Эспаньол ⚽️16%
  2. Ничья 🤝13%
  3. Реал Мадрид ⚽️77%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

12 Aug 2026, 18:36 UTCAnonymous Poll334 voters

❓ Что будете смотреть?

  1. 🗼-⚽️75%
  2. ⚽️-⚽️34%

The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 265 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

GOALTIME
@goaltime2026 · 23,374
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 September 2026
Реал Мадрид - HalaMadrid! 🤍
@i_realmadrid · 27,781
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 September 2026
Футбольные Новости | Трансферы
@Novosti_Footballs · 42,944
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 26 August 2026
Футбол Европы
@rffootballeuro · 51,389
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 29 August 2026
Мир Футбол | Лига Чемпионов
@footballearn · 55,611
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 September 2026
А что там в футболе?
@che_football · 25,172
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 September 2026
БАРСЕЛОНА
@barcelona_aaa · 23,629
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 17 September 2026
Футбол Новости
@Football_sportss · 32,238
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 September 2026
Супер Футбол ~ Лига чемпионов
@super_fotballs · 42,057
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 29 August 2026
Champions League • Лига Чемпионов • Чемпионат Мира
@championsleague365 · 38,285
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
INSIDE | Новости футбола
@rfinsidenewss · 49,958
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 25 August 2026
Foot Football
@foot_footballs · 39,739
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 August 2026
Футбол 24/7 | Лига Чемпионов
@footballhourss · 150,564
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
INSIDE ФУТБОЛ
@rfinsidetransfers · 39,509
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 30 August 2026
Реал Мадрид
@real_madridgo · 76,232
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 19 August 2026
EuroFoot / Лига Чемпионов
@Eu_ffoo · 77,127
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 August 2026
Сливочные | Реал Мадрид ️
@realmadrid557 · 29,134
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 September 2026
Смотри Футбол
@ifootball · 36,173
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 1 September 2026
Дом Футбола
@footballhsdd · 30,339
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
Трансферный рынок
@transferik · 29,073
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 September 2026
БАРСЕЛОНА
@i_barcelonafc · 65,991
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 August 2026
АПЛ | Английская Премьер-Лига
@APL_666 · 24,073
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 September 2026

This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Евро-Футбол” (@euro_fo0tbal), 17,372 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/euro_fo0tbal.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.