Channel
@ethicalhackeritaliani
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,449subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001432509235 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ethicalhackeritaliani |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ethicalhackeritaliani |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:28 | 3,449 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:34 | 3,448 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:15 | 3,446 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 3,446 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (12 June 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,378 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 21:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lo sfruttamento della vulnerabilità consente l’esecuzione di codice JavaScript arbitrario nel contesto del browser quando gli utenti aprono un’e-mail appositamente manipolata mediante l’applicazione Web di Outlook. https://www.cybersecurity360.it/news/falla-in-outlook-apri-une-mail-e-ti-infettano-non-servono-piu-link-o-allegati/
[OGGI TERMINA L'OFFERTA...TEMPO QUASI SCADUTO!] 🚨 Il futuro del Penetration Testing è arrivato. Sei pronto? L'intelligenza artificiale non sta cambiando solo il modo in cui scriviamo codice. Sta rivoluzionando anche il modo in cui si esegue un Penetration Test. Per questo abbiamo creato un corso completamente nuovo dedicato agli Agenti AI per il Penetration Testing e l'Ethical Hacking. Costruirai un vero team di …
[ULTIME ORE RIMASTE...RIMANE POCO TEMPO!] 🚨 Il futuro del Penetration Testing è arrivato. Sei pronto? L'intelligenza artificiale non sta cambiando solo il modo in cui scriviamo codice. Sta rivoluzionando anche il modo in cui si esegue un Penetration Test. Per questo abbiamo creato un corso completamente nuovo dedicato agli Agenti AI per il Penetration Testing e l'Ethical Hacking. Costruirai un vero team di Agenti…
[L'OFFERTA STA PER TERMINARE...RIMANE POCO TEMPO!] 🚨 Il futuro del Penetration Testing è arrivato. Sei pronto? L'intelligenza artificiale non sta cambiando solo il modo in cui scriviamo codice. Sta rivoluzionando anche il modo in cui si esegue un Penetration Test. Per questo abbiamo creato un corso completamente nuovo dedicato agli Agenti AI per il Penetration Testing e l'Ethical Hacking. Costruirai un vero team …
[I COUPON DISPONIBILI STANNO PER TERMINARE...NON PERDETE TEMPO!] 🚨 Il futuro del Penetration Testing è arrivato. Sei pronto? L'intelligenza artificiale non sta cambiando solo il modo in cui scriviamo codice. Sta rivoluzionando anche il modo in cui si esegue un Penetration Test. Per questo abbiamo creato un corso completamente nuovo dedicato agli Agenti AI per il Penetration Testing e l'Ethical Hacking. Costruirai…
🚨 Il futuro del Penetration Testing è arrivato. Sei pronto? L'intelligenza artificiale non sta cambiando solo il modo in cui scriviamo codice. Sta rivoluzionando anche il modo in cui si esegue un Penetration Test. Per questo abbiamo creato un corso completamente nuovo dedicato agli Agenti AI per il Penetration Testing e l'Ethical Hacking. Costruirai un vero team di Agenti AI che collaborano tra loro per automatiz…
Secondo Searchlight Cyber, due gravi falle affliggono WordPress. L’attacco Wp2shellsfrutta vulnerabilità che permettono l’esecuzione di codice remoto anche in assenza di autenticazione. https://www.cybersecurity360.it/news/wp2shell-le-vulnerabilita-in-wordpress-le-patch-sono-urgenti-ma-non-bastano/
La Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) statunitense, insieme a NSA, FBI e alle agenzie di intelligence di altri dodici paesi, ha reso pubblico lunedì 13 luglio un avviso congiunto che descrive una campagna decennale, orchestrata dal “Centro 16” del Servizio Federale di Sicurezza russo, l’FSB. https://www.cybersecurity360.it/news/cosi-i-servizi-russi-hanno-compromesso-router-in-tutto-il-mondo-le-…
Gli hacker stanno boicottando massicciamente strumenti di intelligenza artificiale come ChatGPT, Claude e Gemini. https://www.redhotcyber.com/post/i-black-hacker-boicottano-in-massa-chatgpt-claude-e-gemini-si-va-verso-soluzioni-open/
Un’allucinazione dell’AI generativa ha inventato un ransomware dentro il browser. La tipica allucinazione generativa, a una prima occhiata, si è invece trasformata in un’AI in grado di generare ransomware nel browser. Infatti è riuscita a legare il rischio ipotetico dei browser alla classica cifratura da attacco ransomware, attivabile senza codici nativi, exploit o competenze evolute. https://www.cybersecurity360.…
L’European Data Protection Board ha reso noto lo scorso 7 luglio 2026 di aver pubblicato le Linee guida 03/2026 sul web scraping nel contesto dell’AI generativa, ponendole in consultazione pubblica fino al 30 ottobre 2026. https://www.cybersecurity360.it/news/web-scraping-le-nuove-linee-guida-edpb-per-lera-dellai-generativa/
Il 9 giugno 2026, Anthropic ha lanciato Claude Fable 5, il primo modellopubblicamente disponibile della nuova classe Mythos, come abbiamo riportato nella giornata di ieri. Si tratta della loro AI più avanzata fino ad oggi creata, che eccelle nel software engineering, knowledge work e benchmark di visione. https://www.redhotcyber.com/post/hype-durato-48-ore-claude-fable-5-crackato-a-tempo-record-e-si-riapre-il-dibat…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ethicalhackeritaliani. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,329,496 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ethical Hacker Italiani” (@ethicalhackeritaliani), 3,449 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ethicalhackeritaliani.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.