Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 50 days, net -10,321. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 109,070–122,487 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 13:15
110,618
-1,297
19 Sept 2026, 09:58
111,915
-508
16 Sept 2026, 19:36
112,423
-474
14 Sept 2026, 20:39
112,897
-354
13 Sept 2026, 07:17
113,251
-484
11 Sept 2026, 08:00
113,735
-554
8 Sept 2026, 12:58
114,289
-736
5 Sept 2026, 09:17
115,025
-517
3 Sept 2026, 10:24
115,542
-390
2 Sept 2026, 02:38
115,932
-216
1 Sept 2026, 03:09
116,148
-316
30 Aug 2026, 23:16
116,464
-245
30 Aug 2026, 02:37
116,709
-361
28 Aug 2026, 23:45
117,070
-400
27 Aug 2026, 22:15
117,470
-77
26 Aug 2026, 23:25
117,547
-186
25 Aug 2026, 20:04
117,733
-197
24 Aug 2026, 21:39
117,930
-267
23 Aug 2026, 11:05
118,197
-353
21 Aug 2026, 20:18
118,550
first reading
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 17 June 2024 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 113 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.94%
avg views ÷ 110,618 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,890
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.40%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 11 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held
11 (17 June 2024 – 22 September 2026)
Views total
19,780
Reactions total
870
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
30 Sept 2026, 22:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
7
Links
2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
1,409 reactions across 8 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
404
28.7%
👍
202
14.3%
❤
154
10.9%
🎉
146
10.4%
🥰
122
8.66%
😁
78
5.54%
❤🔥
64
4.54%
👏
62
4.40%
💯
61
4.33%
🤩
56
3.97%
😍
54
3.83%
🤡
6
0.426%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,409 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2024 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Kalshi: $1.9B in Volume or $136M in Real Capital? How Derivative Accounting Distorts Prediction Market Metrics
On September 20, Kalshi reported ~$1.91B in daily volume, while independent estimates placed actual cash-at-risk at roughly $136M.
This 14x gap is not a glitch; it reflects an accounting mismatch between traditional derivatives reporting and how venture investors evaluate market activity.
1. Notional valu…
The $35B AI Infrastructure Question: Who Holds the Downside?
Broadcom, Apollo, and Blackstone have announced the AI XPV Platform, targeting more than 20 GW of compute capacity, with a reported initial $35B facility tied to Anthropic.
The headline is scale. The underwriting question is loss allocation.
Off-balance-sheet financing does not eliminate risk. It reallocates it among the tenant, the SPV, lenders, vendors…
Internal Venture Capital at Revolut: Ship 50 New Products, Kill the Bottom 25%, Scale the Winners
This is not “product management.” It’s a portfolio strategy.
One the most revealing things about Revolut isn’t about banking licenses, Mexico, or valuation.
It was how Revolut builds new products.
The mental model is simple:
Revolut runs product like an internal VC fund.
Not as a metaphor — as an operating system.
The…
Buterin offers solutions to ETH block mining and mining problems
Economies of scale within staking have led to small staking pools going to larger pools, and two organizations have built 88% of ETH blocks in the first two weeks of this month
30% of staked ETH is already more than enough to defend against “51% attacks”.
Crypto Trader Made $554K in Just 24 Hours as Ethereum Skyrockets Unexpectedly
A crypto trader has made $554K in profits after the Ethereum price grew from $2,5721 to $2,626, maintaining a 100% win rate in nine trades.
Trader with a 100% win rate in swing trading $ETH sold 10,206 $ETH($27.8M) 30 minutes ago, making another profit of $554K!
He has traded $ETH 9 times since Aug 12, making money every time, with a tot…
Vitalik Buterin reveals an imminent blockage risk
The co-founder of Ethereum, Vitalik Buterin, recently warned the crypto community about an imminent risk of network saturation. According to him, the number of “blobs” is dangerously approaching its maximum limit.
The growing adoption of layer 2 solutions on Ethereum has led to intensive use of blobs, introduced during the recent Dencun upgrade. These storage spaces…
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @ethereum_newsletter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dan Evseev | Oversubscribed Capital” (@ethereum_newsletter), 110,618 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ethereum_newsletter.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
