Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for eskeriah | эскерия

Channel

eskeriah | эскерия

@eternalsolareye

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

159subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002413632425
TypeChannel
Username@eternalsolareye
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/eternalsolareye

Growth

158159158.57 August 2026 — 158 subscribers8 August 2026 — 158 subscribers14 August 2026 — 159 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 158–159 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 09:38159+1
8 Aug 2026, 18:01158no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:02158first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 13 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
64.5%
avg views ÷ 159 subscribers
Avg views / post
103
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026
Posts held14 (13 June 202622 July 2026)
Views total205
Reactions total33
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 18:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

246 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8032.5%
🔥5221.1%
custom 52696584983203359443815.4%
custom 5334517147349586040239.35%
👻208.13%
custom 5269586252675446656166.50%
custom 5420108363725836435114.47%
❤‍🔥62.44%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 246reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
66
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 14 we hold a reading for · 21%
Most on one post
50
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @eternalsolareye. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 June 2026 to 22 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

22 Jul 2026, 15:22 UTC102 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

тг обрезал нехорошо на превью, я обидевси.. 🙂 upd.: перезалил арт с рамками, безрамочность подгружена в комментариях

👻65

22 Jul 2026, 15:21 UTC103 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

снова варрэчка. попытки в стилизацию продолжаются. кроме белоликого тут ещё будет контент, но пока больше всего скетчей за год с ним скопилось, да и рисование его делает мне слишком хорошо.. 🍓 #eldenring #varre #whitemaskvarre #fullart #fanart

14custom 53345171473495860404🔥2custom 52696584983203359442

13 Jul 2026, 19:46 UTC133 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @sopor_radialisPhoto

два гордых данмера родитель 1 и родитель 2 (@eternalsolareye)

🔥13custom 52696584983203359445custom 53345171473495860403

13 Jul 2026, 19:46 UTC138 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

когда мой ушастый искал братство, а кажется попадёт в форменное бл9дство.. #setres@eternalsolareye #fromyou@eternalsolareye

custom 52695862526754466566custom 53345171473495860401custom 54201083637258364351

7 Jul 2026, 21:25 UTC193 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

а, ну и раз такой движ пошёл, несерьёзный ответ с фромсофт аска на довольно нормальный вопрос но почему бы и да дурдом что с человеками, что с овцами дурдом (вот надо было так же рофельно-картофельно нарисовать, как помидорковое, но ладно, тоже недурно жаль что до стиля как в помидорковом дошёл буквально после добития этого ответа) #varre #whitemaskvarre #fullart #ask@eternalsolareye

11custom 52696584983203359443🔥1custom 53345171473495860401

7 Jul 2026, 21:07 UTC131 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

вот бы только в таком стиле только подобных мультяшек рисовать, всё достало, только такое и даёт радость но нет, вечно нужно всё усложнить спасибо что это не усложнилось 😵‍💫

6🔥1

7 Jul 2026, 20:58 UTC140 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

рождено благодаря конфе фромсофт аска, ибо зареквестили Варрэ в поле помидоров после обсуждения моего всратого хэда на то что белоликий связан с ними, а то и выращивает их в промышленных масштабах Варрэ и помидоры вообще сочетаются т.к. вломит по самые помидоры... ну и точно испанское/южно-итальянское влияние есть, свято верю в это #varre #whitemaskvarre #eldenring #fanart #meme@eternalsolareye я хз скетч это или ч

🔥15❤‍🔥6custom 52695862526754466561custom 52696584983203359441

1 Jul 2026, 21:37 UTC273 views30 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

селфхарм, уберите детей и особо мнительных от экранов кмк они там все в династии своей режутся, ибо кровь да любовь 🙏🥀 никому не советую и вообще берегите себя. подражать не советую тем более. ___ #fanart #eldenring #varre #whitemaskvarre #selfharm@eternalsolareye #guro@eternalsolareye (яхз тоже вполне гурятина если продолжить резку)

👻148custom 52696584983203359445custom 52695862526754466562custom 53345171473495860401

25 Jun 2026, 20:21 UTC224 views35 reactions15 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

варречка, не опять а снова ___ #fanart #eldenring #varre #whitemaskvarre

22custom 53345171473495860407custom 54201083637258364353custom 52696584983203359442🔥1

25 Jun 2026, 20:20 UTC227 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

админ походу за весь слитый год отыграться решил, реанимировав все скетчи, а их там было 80% с варрэ.. 👍 а ещё, кажется нашёл способ рисования на планшете очень близкий к тому что было маркерами на бумаге, ура.. спустя столько лет поисков и проб если не проебу алгоритм при следующем заходе, будет чудо

custom 54201083637258364355custom 53345171473495860402🔥1

20 Jun 2026, 22:08 UTC218 views24 reactions50 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ему приятно 🥀 наверное #fullart #varre #whitemaskvarre #eldenring #fanart

🔥16custom 52695862526754466563custom 52696584983203359443custom 54201083637258364352

14 Jun 2026, 22:20 UTC194 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @sopor_radialisPhoto

милый погасший @eternalsolareye 🖤 #OC #tarnished #tarnished_oc #eldenring

custom 5269658498320335944114custom 52695862526754466562custom 53345171473495860402

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @eternalsolareye. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 274,689 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“eskeriah | эскерия” (@eternalsolareye), 159 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eternalsolareye.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.