Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ЭТАТИСТ

@etatiste

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

18subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002078231367
TypeChannel
Username@etatiste
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 27 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/etatiste

Growth

186 August 2026 — 18 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18 subscribers6 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17–19 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 18:0018no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:4218first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 April 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Links
10

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 April 2024 to 4 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Sept 2025, 12:03 UTC57 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

❗️Скоро будут интересные новости https://t.me/+kGjPd9fQodEwYTJi https://t.me/+kGjPd9fQodEwYTJi https://t.me/+kGjPd9fQodEwYTJi Подробности тут ☝️😲 не пропусти

👍1

8 Aug 2025, 12:57 UTC63 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @DateForumSticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

8 Aug 2025, 12:57 UTC62 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @DateForumSticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

27 Apr 2024, 09:59 UTC588 viewsread 11 August 2026

🤡 Кулеба иностранных дел Украины опять опозорилсяВо время вчерашнего визита в McDonald;s с Блинкеном он рассказал госсекретарю, что в студенческие годы ходил в эту сеть ресторанов, чтобы избавиться от похмелья.Блинкен в ответ на слова про похмелье заявил, что с ним такого никогда не случалось.Вот что происходит, когда дипломатический этикет тебе никогда не преподавали. При всей своей неадекватности Блинкен тут себя п

27 Apr 2024, 09:59 UTC542 viewsread 11 August 2026

🇺🇦🇬🇧Появилось первое видео с уничтоженным британским танком Challenger 2 Видео было сделано в районе Работино. Напомню: британские «Челленджеры» появились на Украине в середине мая, с тех пор на фронте их никто не видел. В британских СМИ даже стали писать, что Великобритания запретила использовать свои танки, чтобы их не постигла участь «Леопардов».Судя по всему, «Леопарды» стали беречь, и ВСУ приходится использовать

27 Apr 2024, 09:59 UTC485 viewsread 11 August 2026

⚡️⚡️ Ждете эфир в 21.00?; Игорь Орлов @etatiste обсудит главные события дня ☝🏻 https://youtube.com/live/_wSgYKU1Ix8ВКонтакте | RuTube | Telegram | Politube | VK Play

27 Apr 2024, 09:59 UTC402 viewsread 11 August 2026

;Это не пробуксовка, это провал;. Путин об украинском контрнаступлении

27 Apr 2024, 09:59 UTC397 viewsread 11 August 2026

«Можете приезжать к нам отдыхать»Путин предложил Эрдогану почаще проводить время в Сочи. А турецкому лидеру место понравилось

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @etatiste. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 940,946 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ЭТАТИСТ” (@etatiste), 18 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/etatiste.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.