Channel
@estudio5elemento
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,725subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001719103021 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @estudio5elemento |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/estudio5elemento |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:25 | 1,725 | +2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:32 | 1,723 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:48 | 1,724 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:17 | 1,723 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (22 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7,675 |
| Reactions total | 363 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 10:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
363 reactions across 20 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 342 | 94.2% | |
| ❤ | 18 | 4.96% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 0.826% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 363reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://youtu.be/cIO9fQQDpmY Homem-Aranha evacuado por pum tóxico, Cobra Coral prometendo caos climático, morte no telhado do hospital, político mudando de cor e democrata nocauteado na praia. Assista agora a mais um Notícias de 5ª onde a realidade perdeu o filtro.
👍7
https://youtu.be/9GQv6OCy8cs Liberalismo em colapso, petrodólar em crise, Big Techs virando impérios e Brasil preso ao rentismo. Lorenzo Carrasco e Arthur Machado conversam sobre como a crise global aparece como econômica, moral e civilizacional.
👍15
https://youtu.be/LKvueqD0i28 Parece que os árbitros do Youtube deixaram nosso programa boiando no VAR. Mas não entrem em pânico: o TROCANDO AS BOLAS está disponível para os belos olhos de nossos espectadores. Não percam e bebam bastante água!
👍13
https://youtube.com/live/SuAV2fJjcRI Flávio escolheu Alfredo Gaspar, relator da CPMI do INSS, como vice. O homem que pediu prisão e indiciamento de Lulinha agora entra na chapa para levar segurança, Nordeste e corrupção ao centro da campanha. Vamos discutir essas e outras notícias no PUXANDO O FIO, ao vivo!
👍18
https://youtu.be/LKvueqD0i28 Trocando as Bolas declara guerra ao futebol salta pocinhas. Chega de teatro, cera, chilique, juiz cercado e lateral dramático! Além disso, temos giro da rodada, musa da semana, capa dura e o lanchinho varonil de sempre.
👍11❤1
https://youtu.be/nrtx-BXq0cA Homem-Aranha sem lacração, Marvel tentando recomeçar, X-Men chegando com sionismo, Israel, mutantes e guerra cultural. No Pop Corner, a cultura pop troca o sermão progressista por conflitos ainda mais explosivos.
👍12❤1
https://youtu.be/nwNf0RM3yLk Flávio pressionado, Bolsonaro calado (até em IA), direita em silêncio, elites com medo, Faria Lima confortável e povo esmagado por mercado, luz e insegurança. A República acabou, mas alguém avisou ao eleitor?
👍23
https://youtu.be/nGJV27TD2NQ A esquerda vende compaixão, mas os dados mostram outra coisa: Auxílio Emergencial, tecnologia, transparência e foco na primeira infância provaram que cuidar dos pobres exige entrega, não palanque.
👍18👏1
https://youtu.be/SlI60KbbZCQ Hipermonopólios tecnológicos já controlam a infraestrutura da economia. O resultado? Estados e corporações fundem inovação, IA e poder geopolítico enquanto países sem soberania digital viram colônias de ecossistemas estrangeiros. Saiba mais no GEOECONOMIA de hoje!
👍19👏2
https://youtu.be/qF31bbEwyfE?is=nWfvuX-kRjZ-TDkE Katy Perry presa na garrafa, barbearia nudista, milionário tentando virar jovem, time galês livre de maldição, vovó no pole dance e Fujimori com peru fraco. Notícias de 5ª: a realidade sem freio.
👍17
Flávio foi confirmado e o sistema reagiu: IA virou pretexto judicial, terceira via procura substituto, Faria Lima lucra e a soberania só vale contra Milei. Sem Flávio na disputa, não há eleição válida. Assista agora ao Puxando o Fio dessa semana! https://youtube.com/live/STpA_ZN6_V4
👍24❤4
https://youtu.be/rDuWiiz1amo Trocando as Bolas volta com Mini-AVCs, giro da rodada, musa da semana, edição de capa dura, muié no futebol e a elegância esportiva de sempre. Senta o dedo no play e faça amor, não faça guerra.
👍13
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @estudio5elemento. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 496,086 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Estúdio 5o Elemento” (@estudio5elemento), 1,725 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/estudio5elemento.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.