Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ESTETICA. SVET

Channel

ESTETICA. SVET

@esthetica_light

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

130subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001650947467
TypeChannel
Username@esthetica_light
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/esthetica_light

Growth

1291311307 August 2026 — 131 subscribers9 August 2026 — 131 subscribers14 August 2026 — 130 subscribers21 August 2026 — 129 subscribers27 August 2026 — 130 subscribers7 August 202627 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 20 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 129–131 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 23:46130+1
21 Aug 2026, 00:44129-1
14 Aug 2026, 17:26130-1
9 Aug 2026, 01:00131no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:11131first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 26 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10m 12s
Average length
1m 17s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

28 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1139.3%
🔥1139.3%
621.4%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 26 February 2026 to 22 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Jun 2026, 08:41 UTC84 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Хочется поделится одной нашей историей, которая могла и не состоятся по одной простой причине: некачественно оказаная услуга в этом же доме 7 лет назад! Как только мы зашли на порог перед замером, хозяйка квартиры узнала меня, сказав что это мы делали ей потолки в свое время и сделали, мягко говоря "неочень"! После чего, продолжая делать замеры и обсуждать вопросы, находился в полном недоумении, нужно ли продолжать?

1

19 Jun 2026, 09:33 UTC75 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Завершили очередной проект в частном доме в поселке Кременки.

🔥3

19 May 2026, 17:33 UTC88 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Что нужно знать при проектировании выключателей

👍1

5 May 2026, 11:49 UTC114 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

3 варианта светильников для камерного освещения

👍4

23 Apr 2026, 11:18 UTC126 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Короткий обзор с выставки Мосбилд2026. Приятного просмотра👀

2

7 Apr 2026, 10:21 UTC157 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Друзья. Ультратонкие световые линии в стены и на потолок. Особенности ленты для таких решений

🔥3

27 Mar 2026, 10:44 UTC152 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Совместимость трековых светильников с магнитными системами разных производителей

🔥2

18 Mar 2026, 10:08 UTC155 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Теперь ЭТЕТИКА.СВЕТ в МАКС

👍1

Signed Эстетика. Свет

18 Mar 2026, 05:49 UTC140 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Друзья, Яндекс лампочка в магнитной трековой системе, это реально. Приятного просмотра

🔥3

Signed Эстетика. Свет

26 Feb 2026, 11:25 UTC183 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Часто поступали запросы на радиусную трековую систему встроенную в натяжной/гипсовый потолок. Теперь решение есть. Благодаря этой системе можно создавать круглые и овальные трековые конструкции. Как вам? Делитесь в комментариях вашим мнением

👍53

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @esthetica_light. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,157,550 of 1,623,166entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ESTETICA. SVET” (@esthetica_light), 130 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/esthetica_light.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.