4 measurements spanning 14 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35–43 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
21 Aug 2026, 20:59
42
+1
14 Aug 2026, 14:37
41
+5
10 Aug 2026, 22:46
36
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:05
36
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 19 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1204.8%
avg views ÷ 42 subscribers
Avg views / post
506
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.77%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held
19 (19 April 2026 – 9 August 2026)
Views total
1,012
Reactions total
28
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Aug 2026, 22:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
534 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤡
436
81.6%
😢
34
6.37%
👍
18
3.37%
❤🔥
16
3.00%
😁
16
3.00%
🔥
14
2.62%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 534reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 19 April 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Хотеть себе в жёны девственницу — абсолютно нормальное мужское желание. Кто же захочет себе нагулявшуюся, пересосавшую десятки членов, выпившую литры спермы, мать своих детей? Никто из тех мужиков не стал на ней жениться: они её использовали по назначению и передали другому, а Василий взял ответственность и женился.
Понятно, что сейчас это практически невозможно. Поэтому жениться нужно на девушке максимум 22 лет. Та…
Скоро будут подпольные магазины с книгами без цензуры. Может быть, уже такие есть.
P. S. Встретил на днях русскую девушку, лет, может, 19. Шла за ручку с чёрным Магомедом. А ведь через пару лет, когда её попользуют, русский Василий женится после всяких Магомедов, Арсенов, Вазгенов. Жалко Васю.
Посмотрел видео, где грузин выписал удар какой-то Наташке в отеле.
Во-первых, чтобы поехать в Грузию второй раз надо быть абсолютно нездоровым человеком. Вся Грузия в дерьме, бедное население, сраная еда и каловые грузины.
Во-вторых, этот бородач должен отъехать в тюрьму не на 3 года, а минимум на десятку. Таким людям нельзя появляться в обществе.
В-третьих, бить женщину можно лишь в случае, если она тебя начинает би…
Все театральные постановки нужно переосмысливать и ставить заново, потому что основная масса постановок — уже старое, заржавевшее, унылое говно, которое смотреть невозможно. Даже Шекспира можно отменно интерпретировать в современных реалиях. Но вопрос не в пьесах, а в режиссёрах. Они смотрят, как ставили "до", и начинают копировать. Такое не нужно, иначе старики вымрут, а молодёжь до театра так и не дойдёт. Необходим…
Мамлеев написал лютую ссанину. Хорошо, что книжка была небольшая.
Начинаю читать Мастера - Луи Селина.
🤡18❤🔥2👍1🔥1😢1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @esthetas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Энтони Лавджой” (@esthetas), 42 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/esthetas.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.