با درود به همگی همراهان گرامی😊 از مشارکت پاسخدهندگان، کمال سپاسگزاری را داریم و به اطلاع شما میرسانیم که پاسخها در بخش دیدگاههای مربوط به هر پرسش در اختیار شما داوطلبان ارجمند قرار داده شدهاند.
Signed Ostad Ahmadian

Channel
@estedadkadeh
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
84subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001751610202 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @estedadkadeh |
| Description | ®️ زیر نظر استاد احمدیان @ostadahmadian ✒️ مدرس و مولف کتابهای استعداد تحصیلی دکتری و کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت کسبوکار (MBA) |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/estedadkadeh |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 84 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:31 | 84 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 31 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
با درود به همگی همراهان گرامی😊 از مشارکت پاسخدهندگان، کمال سپاسگزاری را داریم و به اطلاع شما میرسانیم که پاسخها در بخش دیدگاههای مربوط به هر پرسش در اختیار شما داوطلبان ارجمند قرار داده شدهاند.
Signed Ostad Ahmadian
پاسخ درست از دید شما:
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Ostad Ahmadian
7️⃣ ابتلا به بیماری صعبالعلاج، بستری شدن و درمانهای طولانی، کودک را مستعد تنش، اضطراب و نگرانی میکند و کودکان اغلب در بیان شفاهی احساساتشان با مشکل روبهرو هستند. براساس برخی پژوهشها میتوان گفت که بازی، فرصتهایی را برای رهاسازی احساسات، نظیر خشم و ترس، در اختیار کودکان قرار میدهد که بیان آنها به شیوه دیگر دشوار است. در حقیقت بازی درمانی میتواند در کاهش اضطراب کودکان سرطانی مؤثر باشد، لذا پرسنل بهداشتی- درمان…
Signed Ostad Ahmadian
پاسخ درست از دید شما:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Ostad Ahmadian
6️⃣ تقلید، واژهای است که هرگاه از بازی رئالیستی سخن بهمیان میآید، زیاد شنیده میشود و همواره یک بار منفی را با خود حمل میکند. این بار منفی، از جایی ناشی میشود که واژه تقلید در مقابل واژه تخیّل قرار میگیرد. هرچند که در بسیاری موارد، تخیّل و خیالپردازی را مترادف هم میدانند، اما نباید در قلمرو رئالیسم، تخیّل و خیالپردازی را یکی دانست. در واقع، «تخیّل» یعنی فکرد کردن به رویدادها و پدیدههایی که در حال حاضر وجود…
Signed Ostad Ahmadian
پاسخ درست از دید شما:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Ostad Ahmadian
5️⃣ ولی واقعیت این است که یک آفریننده باید بتواند که حتی احمق به نظر برسد. او باید این به اصطلاح آبرو و حیثیت خود را به مخاطره بیندازد. به همین دلیل هم همیشه شاعران، نقاشان و موسیقیدانهایی را میبینیم که آدمهای چندان آبرومند و محترمی نیستند، ولی بسیار خلاق و دوستداشتنی هستند. البته تا وقتی که هنوز آبرویی دست و پا نکردهاند و جایزه نوبل نگرفتهاند؛ چرا که در این صورت و از آن لحظه به بعد، خلاقیت دود میشود و به هوا…
Signed Ostad Ahmadian
پاسخ درست از دید شما:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Ostad Ahmadian
4️⃣ واژه «هویت»، از مفاهیمی است که بهتدریج وارد تخصص طراحی شده است، اما آنچه تاکنون در طراحی محصولات، کمتر به آن پرداخته شده و حلقه مفقوده است، طراحی براساس هویت معنوی است. با اینکه فطرت الهی در وجود انسان و گرایش او به معنویت، بُعدی بااهمیت از وجود انسان است، اگر طراحی بخواهد محصولی را مبتنیبر هویت معنوی طراحی کند یا با یک محصول، مضمونی الهی را منتقل کند یا محصولی بر این اساس ارزیابی شود، روشهای مناسب و منابع در …
Signed Ostad Ahmadian
پاسخ درست از دید شما:
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Ostad Ahmadian
3️⃣ فرض بنیادین نظریه بازتاب درباره ارتباط متقابل سینما و جامعه، بر این مبتنی است که مضامین فیلم های هر دوره، بازتاب شرایط اجتماعی حاکم در آن دوره است. اصولا فرض ربط متقابل هنر و جامعه و نفوذ هریک بر دیگری، فرضی قدیمی و استخواندار است. هنرمند حتی اگر به دور از جنجالهای زندگی روزمره باشد و خود را مطرود جامعه احساس کند، باز هم رگههایی به ظاهر گم و ناپیدا از عناصر محیط اجتماعی در اثرش یافت خواهد شد. در واقع، همان گون…
Signed Ostad Ahmadian
پاسخ درست از دید شما:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Ostad Ahmadian
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @estedadkadeh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 9 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
پاسخ درست از دید شما:
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
پاسخ درست از دید شما:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
پاسخ درست از دید شما:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
پاسخ درست از دید شما:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
پاسخ درست از دید شما:
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
پاسخ درست از دید شما:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 January 2025 to 13 February 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,219,024 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“استعدادکده” (@estedadkadeh), 84 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/estedadkadeh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.