Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for عشق ابدی 🎀آنتی پیکمی🎀

Channel

عشق ابدی 🎀آنتی پیکمی🎀

@eshgheabadii_facts

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

8,749subscribers

+1,561 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002325802402
TypeChannel
Username@eshgheabadii_facts
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/eshgheabadii_facts

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7,1738,7497,96111 August 2026 — 7,188 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,173 subscribers15 August 2026 — 7,485 subscribers18 August 2026 — 8,166 subscribers21 August 2026 — 8,253 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,557 subscribers27 August 2026 — 8,630 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,646 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,564 subscribers7 September 2026 — 8,556 subscribers11 September 2026 — 8,536 subscribers15 September 2026 — 8,714 subscribers26 September 2026 — 8,749 subscribers11 August 202626 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 46 days, net +1,561. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,937–8,985 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 21:568,749+35
15 Sept 2026, 21:598,714+178
11 Sept 2026, 18:598,536-20
7 Sept 2026, 15:568,556-8
2 Sept 2026, 14:488,564-82
30 Aug 2026, 22:348,646+16
27 Aug 2026, 20:288,630+73
25 Aug 2026, 03:398,557+304
21 Aug 2026, 14:098,253+87
18 Aug 2026, 12:228,166+681
15 Aug 2026, 03:527,485+312
12 Aug 2026, 03:227,173-15
11 Aug 2026, 19:457,188first reading

Engagement

230 posts held, back to 11 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 230 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
43m 36s
Average length
38s

Measured directly from 68 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

11,213 reactions across 226 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣4,49140.1%
👍1,57714.1%
❤1,0969.77%
custom 49022106544394748418147.26%
custom 60240895441801089395985.33%
👏5965.32%
custom 58707457942350767902802.50%
😨2712.42%
😁2432.17%
😍2352.10%
custom 58571374308758703592332.08%
🔥1901.69%
😐1191.06%
🕊870.776%
💋860.767%
💔690.615%
custom 5852748511170269669660.589%
🥰610.544%
custom 4900437554500733200470.419%
custom 5857237486433997692280.25%
4 further kinds260.232%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 227 of the 230 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,213 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 230 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 229 we hold a reading for · 0.4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @eshgheabadii_facts. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 230 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 16:44 UTC73 views7 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤣5😨1custom 58707457942350767901

Signed 𝑺𝒑𝒊

28 Aug 2026, 16:41 UTC199 views10 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

تو ۴ تا اسکرین کاملا حرفای من واضح و مشخصه در مورد نازی ۱ منطق کسایی ک هیت میدن: حتی خودشونم نمیدونن چی میگن یارو تو یه پیام چن خطی حرفاش تناقض داره واقعا خسته کننده شدن بعصی آدما نباید اینقدرم ساده و نادون بود یکم تلاش یکم فسفر بخدا اونوقت مام عذاب نمیکشیم بسه خدایی

custom 49022106544394748416👍1😐1😢1😨1

Signed MaryaM

28 Aug 2026, 16:41 UTC210 views13 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

یه ذره تاچ؟🤣

🤣8custom 58707457942350767903😨2

Signed 𝑺𝒑𝒊

28 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC355 views17 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

نظر نگین راجب ساناز و ستاره

😐7custom 58707457942350767904👍2👏1😨1custom 49022106544394748411custom 53684459888286191481

Signed 𝑺𝒑𝒊

28 Aug 2026, 15:40 UTC815 views62 reactionsread 28 August 2026

وسط کامنتای داره از ساناز خوشم میادتون یادتون نره ساناز کازین دکی پژمانه🥺

👍39🤣11custom 53684459888286191484👏3custom 49022106544394748412custom 58707457942350767902😐1

Signed 𝑺𝒑𝒊

28 Aug 2026, 15:28 UTC911 views32 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

توصیف مالک از وجنات دنیا "پوریا"

🤣26custom 58707457942350767904custom 49022106544394748411custom 53684459888286191481

Signed 𝑺𝒑𝒊

28 Aug 2026, 14:09 UTC≈1,400 views98 reactionsread 28 August 2026

دوستان به اینم فکر کنید که پویا چون فصل های قبل رو دیده ,, با ی سناریو ذهنیت مشخص به ویلا اومده ی سناریوی مشترک آدم خوشگلی که قوی باشه کم نیاره و درمعرض کتک خوردن و فحش خوردن باشه و جواب همه رو بدون فحش بده ,, شاید عمدا بچه هارو ی نمه دستکاری و حرصی کرده که محبوبیت از بولی شدن بگیره

custom 490221065443947484154👍19😐16👏3custom 53684459888286191483❤2🔥1

Signed 𝑺𝒑𝒊

28 Aug 2026, 13:43 UTC≈1,540 views59 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

اون موقعی که هی میگفتی ولوم پایین فکر اینجاشو نکردی🤣 تهشم که یه بادمجون میکارن زیر چشت جدی وقتی میدونید کتک میخورین مجبورین گونده گیوزی میکنید🏋️

🤣47❤5😐2custom 49022106544394748412👏1custom 53684459888286191481custom 58707457942350767901

Signed 𝑺𝒑𝒊

28 Aug 2026, 13:39 UTC≈1,550 views45 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

بابا گفت کاریت نداره چرا ترسیدی😂

🤣35❤2😐2custom 49022106544394748412👍1😨1custom 53684459888286191481custom 58707457942350767901

Signed 𝑺𝒑𝒊

28 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC≈1,530 views41 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

تلسیدی؟ نتلس🤣

🤣33❤3custom 49022106544394748412🔥1🥰1custom 58707457942350767901

Signed 𝑺𝒑𝒊

28 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC≈1,980 views95 reactionsread 28 August 2026

نگین میگه من نفر سوم نیستم خب راست میگه نفر چهارمه رابطه‌س پویا با رعنا دیت رفت با تینا رفت بعد با نگین اوکی شد "ساحل"

🤣86❤2🔥2custom 53684459888286191482custom 58707457942350767902custom 49022106544394748411

Signed 𝑺𝒑𝒊

28 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC≈1,980 views75 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

از لاکای سیسی ساناز زدم قشنگه؟

🤣70❤1👏1🥰1custom 53684459888286191481custom 58707457942350767901

Signed 𝑺𝒑𝒊

Showing the 12 most recent of 230 posts we hold for @eshgheabadii_facts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Aug 2026, 00:48 UTCAnonymous Poll386 voters

نظرسنجی درباره‌ی «عشق ابدی» کلیک کنید درباره الف-حدود سنی شما ب-انگیزه بچه ها از شرکت در عشق ابدی پ-چند درصد جامعه مث بچه های عشق ابدی هستن با برخی رفتارها (رفتارهایی مثل دروغ و نقاب داشتن و دورویی و تیم کِشی و فحاشی و رفتار ضد زن و روی هم گرفتن و ...)

  1. الف-1: زیر بیست سال هستم.26%
  2. الف-2: بین 20 تا 30 سال هستم.56%
  3. الف-3: بالای 30 سال هستم.16%
  4. ب-1: به نظرت انگیزه این بچه ها از شرکت در برنامه چیه : بیشتر برای هیجان1%
  5. ب- 2: به نظرت انگیزه این بچه ها از شرکت در برنامه چیه: بیشتر برای شهرت29%
  6. ب-3: انگیزه این بچه ها از شرکت در برنامه : بیشتر برای دیده شدن در شبکه های اجتماعی برای کسب درآمد81%
  7. ج-1: چند درصد از افراد جامعه واقعی، رفتارهای شبیه به شرکت کنندگان برنامه دارن؟ «درصد خیلی کمی»18%
  8. ج-2: چند درصد از افراد جامعه واقعی، رفتارهای شبیه به شرکت کنندگان برنامه دارن؟ «درصد متوسط»39%
  9. ج-3: چند درصد از افراد جامعه واقعی، رفتارهای شبیه به شرکت کنندگان برنامه دارن؟ «درصد بالا و اکثریت»30%

The shares total 296%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 230 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“عشق ابدی 🎀آنتی پیکمی🎀” (@eshgheabadii_facts), 8,749 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eshgheabadii_facts.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.