6 measurements spanning 32 days, net +156. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 719–921 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Sept 2026, 17:57
898
+18
30 Aug 2026, 23:43
880
+121
24 Aug 2026, 08:28
759
+15
16 Aug 2026, 03:08
744
+2
8 Aug 2026, 02:02
742
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:12
742
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 3 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
145 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
122
84.1%
😢
9
6.21%
🔥
7
4.83%
🍓
4
2.76%
💩
2
1.38%
👎
1
0.69%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 145 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 May 2026 to 28 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌞 FINALS ARE ALMOST OVER – LET’S PICNIC! 🌿
Hey everyone!
This semester is coming to an end. Now it’s time to trade textbooks for snacks and lecture halls for fresh air.
We’re throwing a picnic meetup on June 30 at 12:00 PM in Sokolniki Park!
Where to find us: Meet at the Main Entrance, then we'll claim the best sunny spot on the grass.
What to bring:
· Your favorite snacks/drinks (sharing is caring 😉)
· A blank…
Sorry for disappearing (again 🥲)
Do you still want to meet?
The weather is not the best this week, maybe we should meet next Saturday, on the 27th of June?
Please write in the comments your thoughts about it, cause I haven't seen you in such a long time and I'm anxious 😅
The shares total 229%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 205%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Since the majority chose the last option, I have two questions:
1) Is it more convenient to meet in the afternoon or in the evening?
2) Which day suits the best?
The polls are below ⬇️
С 15 по 30 июня (опрос сделаем позже по этим датам)66%
The shares total 136%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Hi, bunnies 🐇
Many people have been waiting for this event for the whole year. I'm happy to announce ✨️the picnic✨️
Since the meeting will take place outdoors, we're not bound to the usual schedule. That's why I decided to make a poll and choose the date together with you. Please choose all time slots that suit you 💕
Bunnies, help me win the personal nomination 🙏
Gentle reminder:
You have to be subscribed to the group (please do not unsubscribe until June)
https://vk.ru/wall-220036601_1007
Please vote for us 💕
Attention!
You have to be subscribed to the group of the award
https://vk.ru/wall-220036601_847
❤9
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @escmslu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 229%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 205%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
С 15 по 30 июня (опрос сделаем позже по этим датам)66%
The shares total 136%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 May 2026 to 28 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“English Speaking Club MSLU” (@escmslu), 898 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/escmslu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.