Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Германия | ES Blog

@es_blog

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

10,232subscribers

+88 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001112326185
TypeChannel
Username@es_blog
DescriptionМой путь в Германии 🇩🇪 Основной чат - @es_blog_chat IT_dev - @efimovstanislav ⚡️⚡️⚡️myesblog.de youtube.com/esblog instagram.com/es_blogde twitter.com/esblogde tiktok.com/@es_blog По всем вопроса - @es_blog_bot
Created21 October 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/es_blog

Growth

10,14410,23210,1885 August 2026 — 10,144 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,144 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,152 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,167 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,166 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,179 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,174 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,170 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,232 subscribers5 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net +88. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,131–10,245 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 11:4810,232+62
11 Aug 2026, 11:2810,170-4
10 Aug 2026, 13:2310,174-5
9 Aug 2026, 10:5110,179+13
8 Aug 2026, 13:1610,166-1
7 Aug 2026, 15:4010,167+15
6 Aug 2026, 13:2110,152+8
6 Aug 2026, 02:4810,144no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:2610,144first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.31%
avg views ÷ 10,232 subscribers
Avg views / post
850
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.10%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 28 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 25 of 26 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held28 (10 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total22,107
Reactions total241
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
199
Videos
55
Links
1,010

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 31s
Average length
46s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

241 reactions across 25 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍10543.6%
8936.9%
🔥4719.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 284reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 12:57 UTC297 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Какое видео делаем первым?

  1. Про солнечный замес или что там дальше с панелями60%
  2. Первое видео из цикла "Ни одного дня с нулевым результатом"43%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

11 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC346 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

YouTube решил, а что если сейчас кому то легко? В целом жизнь блогеров слишком проста, и потому ютубчик решил усложнил правила игры. Теперь, чтобы попасть в заветные ряды тех, кто может монетизировать свой контент, нужно будет работать вдвое усерднее. Если раньше для участия в партнерской программе требовалось собрать 4000 часов просмотра и 10 миллионов просмотров на Shorts, то с 2027 года эти цифры удвоятся - 8000

1👍1

11 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC377 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

👥 Полезные каналы в образовании, где можно найти что-то стоящее в сфере образования и науки. Если вдруг решите, что вам это нужно - https://t.me/addlist/yFRZdQyinAo3ZjZi (клик-клик)

👍3

10 Aug 2026, 08:52 UTC522 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ну просто в моменте самооценку подняли 😁😁 ОКей, как скажете!

6👍3

9 Aug 2026, 19:28 UTC648 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

пупупу…. камни голода на Эльбе Когда река обнажает свои "камни голода", это значит, что дела идут не очень. В Германии, на Эльбе, из-за засухи снова показались эти исторические маркеры. Они напоминают нам о временах, когда низкий уровень воды предвещал неурожай и голод. Гидрологи сообщают, что в районе Пирны уровень воды уже давно ниже метра, а в Дрездене - всего 54 сантиметра. Похоже, природа решила напомнить, чт

7👍2

7 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC849 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Получить счет на 2500 евро за детский сады - это как получить подарок от прошлого себя. Да, забывчивость стоит дорого 😴 В видео разбираю, как избежать таких сюрпризов в будущем и как я с этим таки разобрался https://youtu.be/nToKvNMzfrg ❤ го смотреть

4👍2🔥2

7 Aug 2026, 12:47 UTC791 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Немного контента в стиле Бекхема Строго 18+

11🔥11👍2

6 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC816 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

мы тут видео вчера записывали на канал youtube.com/esblog как обычно, которое по плану должно будет выйти завтра. в перерывах необходимо нужно было обязательно прогладиться. хорошего дня :) 🎁 @es_blog 🎁 youtube.com/esblog

13👍5

5 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTC724 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

итак, у нас тут новый кодекс, который должен помочь всем, кто связан с генеративными ИИ-системами, не запутаться в своих же алгоритмах (нет) Суть проста: нужно как-то обозначать контент, который создан ИИ, чтобы никто не заподозрил подвоха. EU AI Act (статья 50) обязывает раскрывать ИИ-происхождение контента, а Кодекс практики предлагает, как это делать технически и организационно. Следование Кодексу добровольно, н

👍51

4 Aug 2026, 07:35 UTC731 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026

😔 За садик оплату пересчитаем? Так как в этом году садик у дочки заканчивается, город подбивает казну и начинает проверять ваши доходы: не изменились ли они за прошлые годы? Скажу сразу: косяк тут полностью мой. Но то, как складывалось общение с представителями города по этому вопросу, вызывает только приятные чувства (хотя платить всё равно надо, так что чувства не совсем искренние 😅). Короче, когда дочка пошла

6👍4

31 Jul 2026, 14:01 UTC967 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🔖 там это... как обычно уже по пятницам новое видео вышло https://youtu.be/DiqvRHsawgU буду рад вашим просмотрам, 🔥лайкам и комментариям ваших историй! Темка топчик - "Три абсурдные истории поиска работы в IT" в моем исполнении, канеш :) 🎁 @es_blog 🎁 youtube.com/esblog 🎁 дружеская поддержка

👍81

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @es_blog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

11 Aug 2026, 12:57 UTCFinal Results30 voters

Какое видео делаем первым?

  1. Про солнечный замес или что там дальше с панелями60%
  2. Первое видео из цикла "Ни одного дня с нулевым результатом"43%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 369,413 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Германия | ES Blog” (@es_blog), 10,232 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/es_blog.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.