Channel
@erwudaye
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,830subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003980792217 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @erwudaye |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 27 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/erwudaye |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:12 | 1,830 | -11 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:00 | 1,841 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:48 | 1,841 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 27 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (27 June 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 11,498 |
| Reactions total | 9 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 04:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
10 reactions across 5 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 10 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🏅苏晚白嫖劵福利竞拍 🎯 参与方式： 🎫 加入-杭州出击通告群 🎫 加入-杭州出击通告认证老师 🎫 加入-杭州出击通告报告专区 🪧 通告群内积分参与，分高者得 ⤷在群中输入「苏晚」 🎁 奖品内容: 🎟 白嫖劵 × 1 💡 活动说明: 该活动由苏晚 @suwanwan011 老师倾情赞助，福利需3天内出击并出具200字报告 📅 竞拍时间：(UTC+8) 2026年8月9日 12时00分00秒-18时00分00秒
❤1
明天就立秋喽
杭州出击通告の报告模板 @CJTG6 【老师艺名】：苏晚 【联系方式】：@suwanwan011 【大概位置】：上城 【验证时间】：2026-08-3 【验证留名】：电饭锅 【推荐指数】：★9.85 【人照相似】：90% 【颜值评价】：颜比照片好看一点 【皮肤身材】：小麦色 光滑 【老师罩杯】：C 【时间管理】：排课宽松， 【情绪价值】：情绪价值拉满，全程边聊边做 【课室环境】：小区回迁房，安全，室内比较干净 【个人卫生】：老师比较注重卫生，漱口水，一次性床单都有 【紧度湿度】：紧多不错，包裹感很强 【服务点评】：服务系女神，这个价格绝对超值的 【过程描述】：观望老师比较久了，在一个炎热的午后选择出击老师头课，正常小区可以开车进入，遥控上楼后看到老师是我喜欢的类型，皮肤是属于小麦色，终于知道之前报告里说的很御是什么意思了，看到真人比照片御多了，老师比较腼腆哈哈哈，交了水费后一起共浴，老师洗的很温柔，说话也很温柔，还短暂的来了一…
❤2
晚御苏晚 pinned a photo
Photo, posted without a caption
杭州出击通告の报告模板 @CJTG6 【老师艺名】：二五 【联系方式】：@suwanwan011 【大概位置】：水湘人家 【验证时间】：2026-07-07 【验证留名】：一块腹肌 【推荐指数】：★8.83 【人照相似】：高度相似，基本没差 【颜值评价】：耐看型，面相里透着一股骚劲 【皮肤身材】：黄皮，皮肤光滑 【老师罩杯】：至少有 d 【时间管理】：时间充裕，无罚站 【情绪价值】：情绪价值很足，有女友感 【课室环境】：小区房，整体干净 【个人卫生】：前后有冲洗 【紧度湿度】：水量充足，包裹感强 【服务点评】：跟老师约好了时间，结果提前到了，老师立马安排，没有让我等待，挺感动的 进门见到老师，非常欲的一张脸，简单交流后开始洗澡，如果有需要老师可以帮洗，不得不说服务真好 上了床后老师也是各种花活都上，口的很舒服，你不喊停老师能一直口过去 看时机差不多就开始正戏，基本你能想出的姿势老师都能配合，并且老师下面的包裹感很强，水也是源源…
杭州出击通告の报告模板 @CJTG6 【老师艺名】：二五 【联系方式】：@suwanwan011 【大概位置】：上城 【验证时间】：2026-08-01 【验证留名】：今天没干 【推荐指数】：★8.85 【人照相似】：必须给这次体验点个大大的赞！小姐姐完全就是照片里走出来的女神，颜值超高，身材更是没得挑，又瘦又有料，性感得恰到好处。不仅外在条件满分，服务态度也超级好，热情又贴心，全程沟通顺畅，让人感觉特别舒服放松。整个环境的氛围感也营造得很棒，私密又温馨，细节处处体现用心。从视觉享受到服务体验，几乎无可挑剔，绝对值得五星好评！以后有需要还会再来，也会推荐给身边朋友，强烈推荐！ 【颜值评价】：颜值比较好，貌似比照片好看一点 【皮肤身材】：比较白，光滑 【老师罩杯】：C 【时间管理】：排课宽松，时间超过了老师也没有催 【情绪价值】：情绪价值拉满，全程边聊边做 【课室环境】：小区回迁房，安全，室内比较干净 【个人卫生】：老师比较注重…
杭州一哥课堂 http://t.me/yigechat 🍀精英车评🌺,爽吃了 | yyds 【时间】： 2026-07-29 【老师】： 苏晚 【I D 】: @erwuyaerwu 【留名】： 10号王 【人照】： 8.5 【颜值】： 9 【身材】： 9.5 【服务】： 10 【态度】： 10 【环境】： 9.5 【综合】： 9.42 【报告正文】 #课室环境 回迁房，出入方便，也安全，遥控指挥上楼 ----------------- #人之初印象 身材167 100左右 黄皮 c 颜值 邻家妹子，无整 胸型 c，奶头小小的 皮肤 东北妹子，手感滑 气质 略施粉黛，耐看 衣品 衣品不错，qqny很多可选 ----------------- #服务环节 陪浴，裕中萧，会帮忙擦后背，递漱口水 本题要考，留作伏笔 主动大蟒蛇 口活不错 ---------------- #嗯嗯体验 反馈度 很棒，一模下面，水哗啦啦 屌感 很…
❤2
晚御苏晚 pinned a photo
💐💐💐开奖了💐💐💐 二五优惠劵福利抽奖 开奖了! 本期总参与人数: 26 1- 今天没干 (消息数 51)(翻倍1) 获得:🎟 300优惠劵 谨祝中奖用户大吉大利万事顺意
❤4
杭州一哥课堂 http://t.me/yigechat 【时间】： 2026-07-29 【老师】： 苏晚 【I D 】: @erwuyaerwu 【留名】： Utraviolence 【人照】： 【颜值】： 【身材】： 【服务】： 【态度】： 【环境】： 【综合】： 【报告正文】 课室环境 小区公寓，一室一厅，整体干净整洁，地板和床单都有明显刚换过的痕迹，没有异味。炮房有一面落地镜，灯光偏暖，不会太亮也不会太暗，基本满足拍摄和自己看的需求。卫生间干净，有独立花洒，没有那种廉价钟点房的压抑感。 人之初印象 身高大约165，偏瘦但有一点肉，腰细。颜值中上，五官清秀，化了淡妆，皮肤偏白，触感细腻，没有明显瑕疵。胸是假体，形状比较自然，手感偏软。气质偏温柔型，说话轻声细语，衣品属于甜美风格，见面时穿的是比较贴身的连衣裙，看起来干净清爽。 服务环节 洗澡环节比较主动，会帮洗身体，有简单的互动，但没有特别花哨的花活。水中箫没有…
晚御苏晚 pinned Deleted message
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @erwudaye. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 910,585 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“晚御苏晚” (@erwudaye), 1,830 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/erwudaye.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.