Channel
@ershouchejingpin
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,519subscribers
+32 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001986884018 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ershouchejingpin |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ershouchejingpin |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 06:41 | 1,519 | +5 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 07:21 | 1,514 | +5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:03 | 1,509 | +4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:39 | 1,505 | +9 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:07 | 1,496 | +10 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:53 | 1,486 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:22 | 1,490 | +5 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 23:22 | 1,485 | -3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 07:14 | 1,488 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:02 | 1,487 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 11 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 5 (11 August 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 49 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀 😀近亿域名价值 锚定品牌根基 😀百年雄心大计 建立长久信誉 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀新用户累计首周包赔突破1000万U 😀重磅福利投入，打造行业领先用户保障体系 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀NO钱包5000万U担保加持，雄厚实力护航，官网权威验证（NO.COM） 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀全球玩家信赖选择 平台实力持续领航 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀知名免费能量赞助商 @hu520 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀【9G.COM】 😀😀😀😀【@uu9g_bot】
😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀【7T.COM】全球公认最稳！ 😀只要您是【85.net】玩家，VIP1:1平移，17,7777转移彩金。 😀新会员首三存【7,777彩金】 😀老虎机【返水1.3%】起，无上限。 😀😀😀😀：【7T.COM】 😀😀😀😀：【@Sogood7T_bot】
2018年韩版小敞篷行驶7万公里便宜出
美版途乐原装气囊有刮蹭2017年9万英里便宜出
帕拉梅拉4 2017年中东版行驶160,000公里，价格不高
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @ershouchejingpin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“迪拜二手车/诚信精品车辆汇总” (@ershouchejingpin), 1,519 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ershouchejingpin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.