Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ❌ ERRORI DI PREZZO ❌

Channel

❌ ERRORI DI PREZZO ❌

@erroriprezzi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,669subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001685339124
TypeChannel
Username@erroriprezzi
Created30 November 2021measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 21 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/erroriprezzi

Growth

3,6693,6813,6757 August 2026 — 3,681 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,681 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,680 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,675 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,672 subscribers21 August 2026 — 3,669 subscribers7 August 202621 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 14 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,667–3,683 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 08:343,669-3
17 Aug 2026, 22:573,672-3
14 Aug 2026, 12:473,675-5
7 Aug 2026, 19:063,680-1
7 Aug 2026, 05:003,681no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:483,681first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 30 November 2021the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

163 reactions across 5 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍11168.1%
3420.9%
👏95.52%
👎74.29%
🎉21.23%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 163reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 30 November 2021 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Jul 2026, 05:53 UTC831 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @riprovaci

❌ ERRORE O PREZZONE? ❌ 📍Jada - Star Wars Nanofigs 12 Pack – Set 12 Mini Personaggi in Metallo Die-Cast da Collezione, Modello 9337360314R00, +3 anni 💰 A solo 3,49 invece di 31,00€ (-89%) 👉 VISUALIZZA L'OFFERTA ⭐️ Segui tutti i nostri canali | #adv | Disclaimer

👎1

19 Jul 2026, 08:44 UTC≈1,020 viewsread 7 August 2026

ℹ️ Entro 30 giorni dalla compilazione del modulo riceverai un'email con il codice DAZN 👉 https://www.haier-europe.com/it_IT/pages/promozioni-tv-regala-abbonamento-dn

19 Jul 2026, 08:34 UTC≈1,240 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @riprovaci

⚽️ Dazn aumenta i prezzi? Ti compri un TV nuovo e... 📍Haier QLED 4K UHD H43S81FUX 43'' - 6 Mesi di Dazn Full 💰A solo 279,99€ invece di 399,00€ (-29%) 👉 VISUALIZZA L'OFFERTA 📍Haier Smart TV 65" QLED - 12 mesi di Dazn Full 💰A solo 449,99€ 👉 VISUALIZZA L'OFFERTA 📺 Questi sono solo solo alcuni dei TV in offerta con 6/12 mesi di Dazn in abbinata qui la lista completa 👉 https://amzn.to/4wSgux3 ⭐️ Segui tutti i nostri c

1

24 Jun 2026, 12:55 UTC≈2,490 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

‼️ RIMOSSE TUTTE LE OFFERTE SCADUTE TUTTE QUELLE CHE TROVATE SOPRA QUESTO POST SONO ANCORA ATTIVE 🚨 Vi ricordo tutti i nostri canali dove potete trovare tutte le migliori offerte: ⚡️@riprovaci - Il canale principale con tutte le migliori offerte 🛒 @offertespesa - Risparmiate sulla spesa di tutti i giorni ☕️ @riprovacicafe - Se volete farvi due chiacchiere...

2

13 Apr 2022, 20:00 UTC≈160,000 views73 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⚠️ Vi ricordo che i prezzi e la disponibilità dei prodotti sono accurati alla data/ora indicata nel post e sono soggetti a modifica. Qualsiasi informazione di prezzo o disponibilità visualizzata su amazon al momento dell'acquisto, sarà applicata all'acquisto di tale prodotto. ℹ️ In qualità di Affiliato Amazon, ricevo un guadagno per ciascun acquisto idoneo

👍529👎6👏6

1 Dec 2021, 19:50 UTC≈175,000 views86 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ℹ️ In questo canale verranno pubblicate esclusivamente tutte le offerte che sul canale principale @riprovaci vengono “identificate” dal titolo 🛑ERRORE O PREZZONE ? 🛑 🔔 Vi consiglio di tenere il canale fissato in alto con le notifiche sempre attive. ⚠️ Chiaramente troverete le stesse offerte pubblicate anche su @riprovaci 🔥 Vi ricordo i canali dove trovare tutte le migliori offerte: ⚡️ Il canale principale con tut

👍5922👏3🎉2

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @erroriprezzi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“❌ ERRORI DI PREZZO ❌” (@erroriprezzi), 3,669 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/erroriprezzi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.