Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Эрмина Котанджян | Вглубь

@ermina_k

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,243subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001129219174
TypeChannel
Username@ermina_k
Created19 August 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ermina_k

Growth

1,2431,2461,244.57 August 2026 — 1,245 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,245 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,246 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,243 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,243–1,246 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 12:341,243-3
10 Aug 2026, 07:021,246+1
7 Aug 2026, 05:001,245no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:481,245first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.0%
avg views ÷ 1,243 subscribers
Avg views / post
199
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 6 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held6 (29 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,193
Reactions total152
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

152 reactions across 6 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9562.5%
😍2013.2%
🙏95.92%
🕊85.26%
💯63.95%
😁53.29%
🥰42.63%
👏31.97%
🔥21.32%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 152reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 11:10 UTC95 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Когда вы поймете, что ваше тело — единственный храм вашей души, вы начнете заботиться о нем тщательнее. Что бы ни случилось, два раза в неделю вот уже три года я — на тренировке по системе Girotonic. И это буквально лучшее, что придумано для тела. Функциональная тренировка, которая ощущается как растяжка, но благодаря которой у меня растут мышцы. Мышечная масса безмерно важна после 30 лет, не для красоты, а для зд

6👏3😍3

5 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC147 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня у меня была завершающая сессия с моим психотерапевтом, с которым я работала почти 2 года. Я пришла к ней в октябре, последней из новых клиентов, кого она могла взять в работу, а через три месяца, в январе услышала диагноз. С ней я миллиард раз поднималась со дна до/во время/после рака. Она держала меня на плаву в самые тяжелые дни. Помогала справляться со страхом смерти. И еще очень много с чем, не хватит м

22💯6🙏3

4 Aug 2026, 20:14 UTC182 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

В четверг выдавали замуж племянницу и крестную маму моего сына… Я впервые в жизни for fun вышла ловить букет и знаете, что? For fun немного вышло из под контроля…поскольку букет, завязанный к лентам, вытянула… я😂🤭

18🕊8😁5😍5

4 Aug 2026, 17:59 UTC188 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Я столько раз стартовала в жизни с нуля, но в этот раз начинала с минус -100500... Я безмерно ценю каждого зрителя и каждое свое достижение, потому что помню те долгие дни, когда я вообще не могла заставить себя встать с постели после всего, что происходило в прошлом году... Никто, кроме меня, не знает, чего мне это стоило. Снова выбрать жизнь и помогать другим выбирать ее каждый день. Спасибо, что вы со мной! ♥️

28🙏6😍5

31 Jul 2026, 18:47 UTC302 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мероприятия, связанные с искусством — единственные, которые я стараюсь не пропускать. В этот раз очень красиво открывали выставку Private Art Residence by ASSETS MUSE расположенную в самом сердце Москвы. «Из ресторанов в космос не летают» Искусство здесь не про автономные арт-объекты вне жизни, оно исследует эстетику повседневности… с щепоткой философии. А еще с веранды отеля «Звезды Арбата», где функционирует вы

7😍3🔥2

29 Jul 2026, 21:08 UTC279 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @MinogarovaNews

Собираю новые новости на выпуск, захожу в один из любимых каналов «мамкина модница» и вижу там такое интервью💔 Мое уважение!!! И восхищение🤍🤍🤍

14🥰4😍4

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @ermina_k. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Эрмина Котанджян | Вглубь” (@ermina_k), 1,243 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ermina_k.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.