Check not locked or burn 0x7c29cDaE24781ae7fACF0057Aa08B54D534a8078

Channel
Ape 0 - 1 eth gamble ♾️
@ercdust
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
14subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002073436084 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ercdust |
| Description | Main : @erclaunches Owner : @xcaptainpepe Its a moon dust channel don't expect higher For marketing gamble dm @xcaptainpepe owner or @Dawg_1 admin |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 28 November 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ercdust |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 14 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:35 | 14 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 28 November 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 December 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 8
- Links
- 64
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
Check not locked or burn yet 0x2bcd3a7c152e73e2903fc90b8724d66af896aa3d
Check not verified 0xc87cc7573f9e7739db5ba499083d87e0f5ae481a
UKNOWN but pop up not verified burn or lock so kinda risk check 0xb3ecfcd63003da714e044e03c2fcb527e36e76f9
Check no info or verified tg 0x10d45e6706664c54cc18e84343877b6386bb025f
99% tax Hahaha so it's rug
Node Bot Buy! 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢 💵 0.25 ETH ($539.37) 🪙 9,300,964 NODBOT 🔷 0x177d…09f5 | Txn ✅ New Holder 🔼 Market Cap $292,108 🦎 Chart 🔵 Trade 🔹 Trending
Node Bot Buy! 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢 💵 1.00 ETH ($2156.50) 🪙 53,080,440 NODBOT 🔷 0xdee5…9bb2 | Txn ✅ New Holder 🔼 Market Cap $209,797 🦎 Chart 🔵 Trade 🔹 Trending
Node Bot Buy! 🟢🟢🟢🟢 💵 0.02 ETH ($42.76) 🪙 1,674,430 NODBOT 🔷 0x74de…6631 | Txn ✅ New Holder 🔼 Market Cap $127,454 🦎 Chart 🔵 Trade 🔹 Trending
Check not yet renounced / verified or burned kinda risk but looks insider or rug https://t.me/NodeBot_Portal 0x8ea9b2e9dc431cc90e877f619b45dda936fe913c
No info but check not yet verified or locked 0x22744ddf30ee0c90b682936fe64f172c9a6e5c79
Check https://t.me/X_AICommunity 0x86c085f693d91e44f05f2797c519ebbfa7939e04
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ercdust. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@ercdust named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ape 0 - 1 eth gamble ♾️” (@ercdust), 14 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ercdust.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.