Video, posted without a caption

Channel
南山 18岁倩倩的小窝
@er67884
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
68subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003687177785 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @er67884 |
| Description | 私聊 @qianqian336 双向 @sx593863926bot |
| Created | 3 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/er67884 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 68 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:45 | 68 | +5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:48 | 63 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 626.8%
- avg views ÷ 68 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 426
- 14 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 16
- of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (3 August 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,967 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 00:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 8
- Videos
- 6
- Links
- 2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 1m 05s
- Average length
- 11s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
派大星出击报告( https://t.me/+2Kbp7dDZd904ZDBk ) 验证留名:loop 验证时间:8.8 老师花名:倩倩 城市坐标:#深圳 #南山 上课花费:800 颜值身材:人照一致,c 服务内容:舌吻,69丝袜,情趣啪啪 出击体验:热的睡不觉在榜上看到老师在开课果断预约离的不远几十分钟的车程就到了,老师摇控上楼课室也很好找开了门闹了点笑话 ,不过老师很热情递水来坐下聊了一会就开始了洗的时候老师还很认真的帮洗👍洗完了坐在床对视一眼就🐍舌头软软的无异味,这里就省略了哥己经不是当年的人了小老弟也是败下阵来了怎么呼唤都站不起来下次一定要狠狠打败老师,坐了一下拜拜屁股走了。总体感觉老师很热情细心 优点缺点:没 推荐程度:9.5/满分10.0分(综合硬件(脸,熊,身材)和软件(服务,态度)等方面打分。自己更看重哪方面,给出打出这个分数的理由) 联系方式: @qianqian336 已验证资源频道(备用防失联): 1、…
Photo, posted without a caption
开课了,现在有位
派大星出击报告 验证留名:李恒生 验证时间:8/4 老师花名:#南山 倩倩 城市坐标:#深圳 #南山 上课花费:800- 颜值身材:大🐻d 160左右 偏黄皮 服务内容:课表 出击体验:进房一眼萌妹,小小个但很有料的身材,大胸萝莉,超级大白兔,伴洗,甜咪咪,69,嫩,随便🐍,很润,很暖,叫的很频,耐桩,屁屁很大很有肉很好玩后入的时候 优点缺点:嫩,大🐻,不催 推荐程度: 9/满分10.0分;(综合硬件(脸,熊,身材)和软件(服务,态度)等方面打分。自己更看重哪方面,给出打出这个分数的理由) 联系方式:@qianqian336 (提交报告需要提供相关资料,如聊天记录,付款记录等)
派大星出击报告( https://t.me/+2Kbp7dDZd904ZDBk ) 验证留名:Rodri 验证时间:8.4 老师花名:倩倩 城市坐标:#深圳 #南山 上课花费:800 颜值身材:人照一致,c 服务内容:舌吻,69丝袜,情趣啪啪 出击体验:老师很主动,性感,情绪价值足,课表内容齐全,69舌吻管饱,三点一粉,逼紧课室环境好,看小黄文少,文笔有限,就这样,会继续返 优点缺点:完全顺着你来的,体验感真的很好 推荐程度:9/满分10.0分(综合硬件(脸,熊,身材)和软件(服务,态度)等方面打分。自己更看重哪方面,给出打出这个分数的理由) 联系方式: @qianqian336 已验证资源频道(备用防失联): 1、https://t.me/+aajVEQ4g6yllZmJk 2、https://t.me/+uNpU1Pf3-_wyNTY9 深圳派大星备用群: https://t.me/+LeNkDFVEzdE2NTJl …
Video, posted without a caption
买了二套情趣衣服,还有更好看的分享下,我备多点。喜欢那套,可以叫我提前穿着
开课位置
认证视频,随便拍的。真人比照片好看
Video, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @er67884. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 671,634 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“南山 18岁倩倩的小窝” (@er67884), 68 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/er67884.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.