Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Epic Gift

Channel

Epic Gift

@epic_gift_official

Not marked by Telegram, checked 21 September 2026

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

1,151,073subscribers

+426,275 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002611568643
TypeChannel
Username@epic_gift_official
DescriptionPlay: @epic_gift_bot Deposit: @giftbackpack For questions or support, contact: @epic_gift_support
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/epic_gift_official

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views and reactions moved apart

On 2 of the 15 posts we watched over 30 days, the view counter climbed while the reaction counter stayed where it was — by more than this channel’s own reactions-per-view rate can account for. That rate, measured on this entry, is 0.0052 reactions per view.

Each interval, as we read it — views and reactions before and after
PostOverViewsReactionsExpected
/93715 Sept 2026, 11:34 UTC5 days133,000 → 154,000at least +20,000586 → 606at most +21+104.4
/95619 Sept 2026, 11:03 UTC3 days103,000 → 123,000at least +19,000555 → 577at most +23+99.2

Expected is the view gain multiplied by this channel’s own prior reactions-per-view rate over the same post — not a corpus average, so a channel whose audience never reacts is compared only against itself. Every interval is credited in the direction that makes the observation harder to record, never easier: t.me renders views and reactions to three significant figures above ~1,000, so a raw delta can be a rendering step. Every delta below is at least 4 x the coarser reading's step, the view gain is discounted by a full step and the reaction gain credited with one. Measured by tgregister velocity.py (our own t.me/s/ readings).

What this does and does not say. It says the two counters moved apart, by more than rounding and more than this channel’s own history predicts. It asserts no cause. Views arriving from outside Telegram, an embedded or forwarded copy of the post, and a burst of readers who simply do not react all produce this shape. This detector has recorded very few observations across the whole register, and its precision has not been measured; treat it as an anomaly worth looking at, not as a finding.

Recorded under the key view_reaction_decoupling, last confirmed 1 October 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

724,7981,151,073937,935.56 August 2026 — 724,798 subscribers7 August 2026 — 730,580 subscribers8 August 2026 — 737,454 subscribers9 August 2026 — 744,426 subscribers10 August 2026 — 749,940 subscribers11 August 2026 — 756,897 subscribers12 August 2026 — 761,368 subscribers14 August 2026 — 766,416 subscribers15 August 2026 — 778,176 subscribers16 August 2026 — 788,972 subscribers17 August 2026 — 798,539 subscribers18 August 2026 — 802,132 subscribers19 August 2026 — 811,864 subscribers20 August 2026 — 827,817 subscribers22 August 2026 — 843,021 subscribers24 August 2026 — 860,223 subscribers25 August 2026 — 871,191 subscribers26 August 2026 — 895,750 subscribers27 August 2026 — 901,456 subscribers28 August 2026 — 909,339 subscribers29 August 2026 — 916,708 subscribers30 August 2026 — 921,726 subscribers31 August 2026 — 933,371 subscribers1 September 2026 — 940,305 subscribers2 September 2026 — 944,039 subscribers3 September 2026 — 957,790 subscribers6 September 2026 — 985,149 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,017,027 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,044,444 subscribers13 September 2026 — 1,073,907 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,087,855 subscribers17 September 2026 — 1,105,344 subscribers27 September 2026 — 1,151,073 subscribers6 August 202627 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 51 days, net +426,275. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 660,857–1,215,014 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Sept 2026, 07:011,151,073+45,729
17 Sept 2026, 12:011,105,344+17,489
15 Sept 2026, 08:191,087,855+13,948
13 Sept 2026, 17:561,073,907+29,463
11 Sept 2026, 20:161,044,444+27,417
9 Sept 2026, 06:551,017,027+31,878
6 Sept 2026, 02:17985,149+27,359
3 Sept 2026, 18:56957,790+13,751
2 Sept 2026, 08:13944,039+3,734
1 Sept 2026, 10:09940,305+6,934
31 Aug 2026, 08:44933,371+11,645
30 Aug 2026, 06:44921,726+5,018
29 Aug 2026, 05:05916,708+7,369
28 Aug 2026, 05:04909,339+7,883
27 Aug 2026, 02:28901,456+5,706
26 Aug 2026, 04:25895,750+24,559
25 Aug 2026, 04:32871,191+10,968
24 Aug 2026, 03:37860,223+17,202
22 Aug 2026, 07:57843,021+15,204
20 Aug 2026, 21:43827,817first reading

Engagement

63 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 116 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.7%
avg views ÷ 1,151,073 subscribers
Avg views / post
123,000
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.531%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
30
of 63 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 October 2026
Posts held63 (31 July 2026 – 1 October 2026)
Views total3,694,200
Reactions total19,599
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Oct 2026, 02:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
720
Videos
135
Links
347

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 1 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
12m 45s
Average length
33s

Measured directly from 23 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

View velocity

How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.

Computed from 15 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days (1 of the 24-hour readings behind this are interpolated, not measured directly): across 14 of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 18 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 36.4% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 69.9% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 76,644 views — 6.66% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 86,750).

8 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
PostReadingsLatest readingCurve24h reachHalf of last-observed views by
/10091 Oct 2026, 11:01 UTC1734 minutes – 16 hours old47,800 views ~278 reactions60 minutes: 20,153 interp. → 3.0 hours: 30,800 → 6.0 hours: 38,700 → 12 hours: 46,200still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h1.6 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing
/100430 Sept 2026, 11:01 UTC4324 minutes – 40 hours old72,500 views ~470 reactions60 minutes: 22,423 interp. → 3.0 hours: 34,100 → 6.0 hours: 42,600 → 12 hours: 51,100 → 24 hours: 59,200still climbing at last reading59,200measured3.7 hours
/100329 Sept 2026, 11:00 UTC6921 minutes – 3 days old84,600 views ~515 reactions60 minutes: 21,200 → 3.0 hours: 32,700 → 6.0 hours: 41,600 → 12 hours: 50,100 → 24 hours: 59,300 → 2 days: 77,800still climbing at last reading59,300measured6.3 hours
/100228 Sept 2026, 11:04 UTC9227 minutes – 4 days old90,700 views ~503 reactions60 minutes: 20,900 → 3.0 hours: 31,700 → 6.0 hours: 40,300 → 12 hours: 48,300 → 24 hours: 56,100 → 2 days: 77,400still climbing at last reading56,100measured8.7 hours
/99227 Sept 2026, 11:04 UTC10911 minutes – 5 days old105,000 views ~468 reactions60 minutes: 22,400 → 3.0 hours: 33,300 → 6.0 hours: 42,300 → 12 hours: 51,300 → 24 hours: 60,500 → 2 days: 80,400still climbing at last reading60,500measured15 hours
/99126 Sept 2026, 11:00 UTC11625 minutes – 5 days old104,000 views ~526 reactions60 minutes: 21,000 → 3.0 hours: 32,300 → 6.0 hours: 40,744 interp. → 12 hours: 50,300 → 24 hours: 60,900 → 2 days: 78,000still climbing at last reading60,900measured16 hours
/98125 Sept 2026, 11:07 UTC11959 minutes – 6 days old111,000 views ~472 reactions60 minutes: 21,500 → 3.0 hours: 33,100 → 6.0 hours: 42,765 interp. → 12 hours: 51,400 → 24 hours: 59,800 → 2 days: 82,500still climbing at last reading59,800measured19 hours
/95619 Sept 2026, 11:03 UTC1512 minutes – 7 days old128,000 views ~586 reactions60 minutes: 28,000 → 3.0 hours: 40,700 → 6.0 hours: 50,700 → 12 hours: 58,091 interp. → 24 hours: 74,187 interp. → 2 days: 94,042 interp. → 7 days: 128,000still climbing at last reading74,187interpolated17 hours

Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.

Reaction mix

35,778 reactions across 63 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥12,23734.2%
🤩4,93313.8%
⚡4,61112.9%
🎉4,25511.9%
😍3,3449.35%
😎2,4126.74%
👾1,5494.33%
👻1,2293.44%
🎃1,2083.38%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 63 of the 63 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35,778 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 63 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 1 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4,024
across the posts below
Posts paid on
63
of 63 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
2,070
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @epic_gift_official. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 63 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 1 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Oct 2026, 11:01 UTC≈47,800 views278 reactions5 Starsread 2 October 2026
Photo

🎰 Farm Box Highlights 👆 🎁 Recent Jackpots: 1 TON → 🎁 Precious Peach 0.5 TON → 🎁 Scared Cat 0.5 TON → 🎁 Westside Sign 0.2 TON → 🎁 Swiss Watch 0.1 TON → 🎁 Heroic Helmet Farm Box is unique: any gift can drop here, from 🎁 Vice Cream all the way to 🎁 Plush Pepe. ⬆️ And with the BOOST mechanic, you can increase your chances of getting rare and valuable drops. 📸 Want to be featured next? Send your best moment to @epic…

🔥138🎉53🤩30😍13⚡12👻11😎10🎃6

30 Sept 2026, 11:01 UTC≈72,500 views470 reactions14 Starsread 2 October 2026
Video

🐋 BIG WINS Keep Coming! 🎁 Epic Gift players keep hitting jackpots and withdrawing top gifts every day 🎰 Huge multipliers, valuable gifts, and rare drops with Black / Onyx Black backgrounds ⚡️ One lucky round can turn into a 1000x+ 🆒 Open Epic Gift and GO BIG 👉 @epic_gift_bot

🔥237🤩91😍48👻20🎃16👾16😎16⚡15

29 Sept 2026, 11:00 UTC≈84,600 views515 reactions55 Starsread 2 October 2026
Video

🌎 2 New Languages Available on Epic Gift 🎁 Epic Gift is now available in Simplified Chinese and Persian (Farsi)! 💬 We want Epic Gift to be easier and more comfortable for players around the world, so we’ve added 2 new languages to the app. ✔️ If your Telegram language is set to Chinese or Persian, Epic Gift will switch automatically when you open the app. ⚙️ You can also change the language anytime: tap your pro…

🔥291🤩74⚡49😍28🎉19😎17👾15🎃12

28 Sept 2026, 11:04 UTC≈90,700 views503 reactions24 Starsread 2 October 2026
Photo

👉 New week, new leaderboard! 🎁 250 prizes of this week: 1 place - 🎁 Durov's Cap 2 place - 🎁 Precious Peach 3 place - 🎁 Scared Cat 4-5 place - 🎁 Gem Signet 6-10 place - 🎁 Sharp Tongue 11-20 place - 🎁 Vintage Cigar 21-50 place - 🎁 Electric Skull 51-100 place - 🎁 Homemade Cake 101-250 place - 🎁 Vice Cream ✨ Earn points by depositing, selling gifts, opening boxes, playing in Play Hub, Rocket Mode, and PvP ⏱️ Less than…

🔥229😍97😎76🎃31👾16🎉15⚡14🤩14

27 Sept 2026, 11:04 UTC≈105,000 views468 reactions42 Starsread 2 October 2026
Photo

🎰 Community Highlights 👆 🎁 Every day, Epic Gift players hit big wins and share their best moments with us Huge multipliers, valuable gifts, and crazy jackpots. We love seeing what you win 🎁🎁🎁🎁 📸 Want to be featured next? Send your best moment to @epic_gift_support 💎 If we choose your moment for a post, you’ll receive a bonus 🆒 Open now and chase your BIG WIN 👉 @epic_gift_bot

🔥222🎉69⚡46😎34👾21😍21🤩20🎃19

26 Sept 2026, 11:00 UTC≈104,000 views526 reactions33 Starsread 1 October 2026
Photo

🎁 Weekly Giveaway! This week’s prizes: ⌚️ Swiss Watch Bronze Age ⌚️ Swiss Watch Day-Date ⌚️ Swiss Watch Blue Bezel ⌚️ Swiss Watch Bruce Wayne ⌚️ Swiss Watch Asteroid ⌚️ Swiss Watch The Grid 🎁 Swiss Watch Random x9 How to join: ✅ Complete tasks 🎟️ Earn tickets 📥 Drop tickets into the Weekly Giveaway The more tickets you add, the higher your chances. Good luck 🍀 🆒 Open Giveaways and join now 👉 @epic_gift_bot

🔥276🎉96😎43⚡30👾20🤩18🎃15😍15

25 Sept 2026, 11:07 UTC≈111,000 views472 reactions34 Starsread 1 October 2026
Photo

🔄 Craft Highlights 👆 🎁 Players keep crafting and winning top gifts, including Black / Onyx Black ones: 🎁🎁🎁🎁 🎁 Just send gifts to @giftbackpack and сhoose your mode: 🛡 Safe: low risk, stable value 🛍 Normal: balanced risk and reward ☄️ Risky: high risk, huge upside, up to 100x Then combine your gifts and try to turn them into something truly valuable 📸 Want to be featured next? Send your best moment to @epic_gift…

🔥226⚡74🎉42😍39👻20👾20🤩20😎20

24 Sept 2026, 11:03 UTC≈92,100 views668 reactions24 Starsread 27 September 2026
Photo

🎁 Plush Pepe from Upgrades 👆 🎁 One player shared his jackpot moment with us. After a quick Upgrade run, he ended up with a Plush Pepe: 🎁 Precious Peach Black → 🎁 Scared Cat Black ✔️ 🎁 Loot Bag Black → 🎁 Westside Sign Black ❌ 🎁 Scared Cat Black → 🎁 Plush Pepe ✔️ 🤑 ~$6,000 profit in under a minute! Congrats 👏 ⬆️ Big Upgrade wins happen on Epic Gift every day. Want yours to be next? 🎁 Send your gift to @giftba…

⚡343😍139😎68🔥29🤩27🎉23👾16🎃14

23 Sept 2026, 11:03 UTC≈93,400 views416 reactions14 Starsread 27 September 2026
Photo

🥊 380,000 PvP Games Played 😎 PvP mode crossed 380,000 games played ⚡️ Quick rounds 🛍 Low fees 🛡 100% Provably Fair 💎 Play with TON or NFT gifts 🎁 Want to use your own gifts? Send them to @giftbackpack. Each gift is valued individually based on its real market price and added to your Epic Gift inventory Then jump into PvP and fight for the bank ⚔️ The more you put in, the higher your winning chance. But even a sm…

🔥223🤩64⚡37😍22🎃17🎉15😎15👾13

22 Sept 2026, 11:01 UTC≈106,000 views436 reactions33 Starsread 27 September 2026
Photo

🧱 Mines Highlights 👆 🎁 Players keep sharing their biggest Mines wins with us every day 🎰 Some of the latest hits: 100 TON → 🎁 Durov's Cap Black 0.1 TON → 🎁 Genie Lamp 0.1 TON → 🎁 Khabib's Papakha 0.1 TON → 🎁 Sky Stilettos 0.1 TON → 🎩 Top Hat In Mines, you can hit jackpots up to 1061x: 1️⃣ Choose how many mines 2️⃣ Place your bet 3️⃣ Open cells 4️⃣ Cash out your reward ⚡️ One good run can turn into a BIG WIN 🆒 …

🔥241⚡56😍36🎉34😎17🎃16🤩13👻12

21 Sept 2026, 11:02 UTC≈99,100 views613 reactions60 Starsread 25 September 2026
Photo

👉 New Weekly Race! 🎁 250 prizes of this week: 1 place - 🎁 Durov's Cap 2 place - 🎁 Precious Peach 3 place - 🎁 Heroic Helmet 4-5 place - 🎁 Artisan Brick 6-10 place - 🎁 Swiss Watch 11-20 place - 🎁 Bonded Ring 21-50 place - 🎁 Rare Bird 51-100 place - 🎁 Snoop Dogg 101-250 place - 🎁 Chill Flame ✨ Earn points by depositing, selling gifts, opening boxes, playing in Play Hub, Rocket Mode, and PvP ⏱️ Less than 7 days left! …

🔥283⚡132🤩81😎27😍20👻19🎃18🎉18

20 Sept 2026, 11:04 UTC≈117,000 views515 reactions64 Starsread 25 September 2026
Photo

🎁 Amazing Run in Rocket Mode👆 🎁 Players keep sending us their craziest wins 🤩 These 2 players managed to withdraw 🎁 51 Durov’s Caps, several 🎁 Heart Lockets, and 🎁 Precious Peaches in a single run 🤑 More than $30,000 worth of gifts withdrawn in one session! Not bad 😎 ⚡️ Only on Epic Gift can you hit huge multipliers and receive valuable gifts in just a few seconds 🆒 Jump into Rocket and chase your jackpot 👉 @epi

🔥233🤩95⚡54🎃29👾23😎22😍21🎉20

Showing the 12 most recent of 63 posts we hold for @epic_gift_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@epic_gift_official edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
7 September 2026
Most recent edit
8 September 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Epic Gift” (@epic_gift_official), 1,151,073 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/epic_gift_official.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.