![Telegram profile photo for epatageDeafening::[ED] 彡](https://cdn.tgregister.com/av/51/5189fe84103a08c27a9fee1598977ce4d0fa463d23b55ee4f5973b806fbc1e26.jpg)
Channel
@epatageDeafening
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
27subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003928081403 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @epatageDeafening |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 3 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/epatageDeafening |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:17 | 27 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 27 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (3 July 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 259 |
| Reactions total | 20 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 07:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
29 reactions across 13 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12 | 41.4% | |
| custom 5463050125356078324 | 9 | 31.0% | |
| custom 5258389341654242521 | 7 | 24.1% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 3.45% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🤩🤩🤩[ED] :: а каким я £щё 🤩🤩🤩долж£н быть, £сли 🤩🤩н£ п₽£₩осходным? 🙂 🤩🤩[ED] :: как я мог¥ ¥ст₽ашать и домини₽о₩ать, £сли б¥д¥ скли$кой, б£сфо₽м£нной л¥ж£й [ED] :: и я оч£нь ста₽аюсь блять, даж£ н£ д¥май об£сц£ни₩ать мои попытки [ED] :: я считай т£₽плю ₩сё т₩оё н£¥₩аж£ни£ ко мн£! 🤨 [ED] :: н£ т₩оими ли были сло₩а «типичный с¥ка б¥₽ж¥й»? 💜💜➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 💜💜[ED] :: н¥ кон£чно ж£ ты н£на₩идишь ₩сё, что хоть как-то п₽…
❤2
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 😻 💜💜🥹🥹🥹 💜💜[ED] :: а ч£м¥ т¥т по₽ажаться? или т₩ой л¥с¥с насколько беспомощный, что б£$ т£бя н£ с₽ёт? [ED] :: €то пи$д£ц ¥га₽но 😆 [ED] :: «наладить контакт» я пытаюсь £щё с самого п£₽₩ого дня, как ты мн£ написал [ED] :: и £сли ты ₩ключишь с₩ою т¥п¥ю бошк¥ 😝 [ED] :: то поймёшь, что я ОЧ£НЬ СТА₽АЮСЬ, относиться к т£б£ снисходит£льно 😀➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 😀[ED] :: и да, ты наглый ☺️ 😀[ED] :: но н£ потом¥ что пол¥ча£шь ₩ни…
custom 54630501253560783241
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 💜💜 💜[ED] :: и$₩инит£ м£ня $а 💜д£₽$ость, но ₩ы ¥₩£₽£НЫ, что ₩ы к¥мога? 🤔 [ED] :: н£ хоч¥ об₩инять ₩ас ₩ ₽ассло£нии личности [ED] :: но €то слишком ст₽анно [ED] :: да₩айт£ п₽ямо, ₩ы СО₩£₽Ш£НО н£ похожи на мо£го кли£нта ❄️ [ED] :: мало того, что он обща£тся н£ как ₩ы, так и к₩и₽к ₩ас ₩ыдаёт 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩[ED] :: £сли ₩ы ¥ж£ 🤩п₽и$нали ошибк¥ и постыдились, то мож£т£ п£₽£дать компьют£₽ к¥мог£? 😊 [ED] :: ¥ нас £щё оч…
❤1custom 52583893416542425211
Sticker, posted without a caption
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 😻😻😻 ❤️🥹Так, что ЭТО за хуйня. Ты же не долбишься в глаза 😻😻😻 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟
custom 54630501253560783243
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 💜💜 💗🥹Кажется ты начинаешь вспоминать. 🫰🫰🫰🫰 «Должен уведомить»? Серьёзно? Когда он вообще так писал? Только из чистой метаиронии которая проскальзывала у него меж зубов. «Сессии»? Разве он не называл это «я час тебе поноюсь, запиши меня на 168 часов от этого дня». С каких пор он стал таким культурным и избирательным в словах? 🐺😻 🐺И самое главное. . .С 🐺каких пор он начал шипеть? Тебе никогда не замечал за н…
❤1custom 54630501253560783241
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 💜💜 💗🥹У работающего не покладая рук тролля проблемы с деньгами? Да ещё и прямо после его возвращения с экспедиции? Тебе пару раз приходилось общаться с теми, кто вылетал по важным делам и им платят достаточно. Возможно конечно дело не в деньгах и это тактичный отказ, но. . . 🐺🥹🥹 🐺Кумога никогда не 🐺отличался тактичностью? Это же блять лазурный, какого чёрта. 🤨 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟
❤1custom 52583893416542425211
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 💗🥹Ты уважаешь решения своих пациентов, всё таки твои сеансы это дорогое удовольствие. Пусть ты и не испытываешь ни к кому сильной привязанности, но каждый раз обидно терять потенциальную прибыль. Да и лазурный был довольно мил. Ты уже кладёшь пальцы на клавиатуру, чтобы прощально ответить и начать искать новый мешок с деньгами, но тут. . . 💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜 ==> Задумайся 😵 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟
❤1custom 52583893416542425211
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 😻💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜😻 [ED] :: мой л¥с¥с ходит сба₩ить н¥жд¥ на ¥лиц¥ [ED] :: £сли ж£ т₩ой с₽ёт т£б£ п₽ямо на мат₽ас, то ¥ м£ня для т£бя плохи£ но₩ости 😝 🤩😻➿😀😀➿😻 [ED] :: и$₩ини что пытаюсь наладить с тобой контакт [ED] :: и и$₩ини, что мн£ н£ нас₽ано, ч£м ты $анят 😑 [ED] :: и блять ты так го₩о₽ишь как-б¥дто вс£ с₽аны£ п¥₽п¥₽ы н£ мог¥т ником¥ писать [ED] :: что ж£ £щё я н£ $наю о с₩о£й к₽о₩и, самый ¥мный ты наш? 🤨 [ED…
❤1custom 52583893416542425211
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 { epatageDeafening [ED] начал троллить arcaneThanatologist [AT] } 💜[ED] :: да₩но н£ 💜слышались 😉 💜[ED] :: н£бось 💜отлыни₩а£шь от ₽аботы по ₽а$г₽£банию го₽ы т₽¥по₩? [ED] :: или ¥би₽а£шь отходы $а л¥с¥сом 😆 🤩😀😀🥹 [ED] :: н¥ ж£, ₽асскажи мн£ ч£м ж£ $анят самый блядски $анятой т₽олль на Альт£₽нии, до кото₽ого Х£₽ ДОПИШ£ШЬСЯ 🤨 [ED] :: ₽а$₩£ сложно читать мои сообщения ч¥ть чащ£ ч£м ₽а$ ₩ обо₽от? [ED] :: €то ка…
❤1custom 52583893416542425211
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 💗🥹Пока твой очень неторопливый друг отвечал тебе, ты решил переключиться на другую более интересную херню. 🐺🐺🐺 🐺🐺🐺🥹 Итак Джадос, вопрос на засыпку : что ты обычно делаешь, когда совершенно не знаешь чем заняться? 👻😻И правильный ответ : начинаешь троллить Альворо Кажется его дерзкое для бургунди поведение ужасно тебя развлекает, не так ли? ==> Джадос, будь предсказуемым и начни троллить ❌АЛЬВОРО❌ 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟
❤1🔥1
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 { epatageDeafening [ED] начал троллить venomoussWhhissper [VW] } [ED] :: $д₽а₩ст₩¥йт£ К¥мога, я т¥т ¥₩ид£л ₩ас онлайн 🙂 [ED] :: посл£дним ₩ашим сообщ£ни£м я помню то, что ₩ы отп₽а₩лялись ₩ €ксп£дицию [ED] :: как я понимаю ₩сё п₽ошло хо₽ошо ☺️ [ED] :: как там на о₽бит£? а то ₩ы долго там п₽обыли, н£ ж£ла£т£ ₽асска$ать? [ED] :: и что по по₩од¥ наших с£ансо₩, ₩ы плани₽¥£т£ п₽одолжать? 😉 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟
custom 52583893416542425212
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @epatageDeafening. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 850,036 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“epatageDeafening::[ED] 彡” (@epatageDeafening), 27 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/epatageDeafening.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.