Channel
@enshixcbg
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
351subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 21 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003084723513 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @enshixcbg |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 21 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/enshixcbg |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:12 | 351 | no change |
| 21 Aug 2026, 23:01 | 351 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (4 July 2026 – 21 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,450 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 21 Aug 2026, 23:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
11 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 54.5% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 27.3% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 18.2% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
【验证留名】：大师 【评价时间】：2026-08-21 【颜值评分】： 【环境评分】： 【态度评分】： 【服务评分】： 【人照评分】： 【身材频道】： 【描述过程】：上次约欣儿还是在她刚下水去北方之前的时候了，转眼大半年了，这次她又回恩施了，果断约上。欣儿宝贝还是没什么变化，小小只可可爱爱，标准的嫩妹，关键是去北方历练了大半年却还是清纯依旧，并没有像很多老师一样越来越油，一如既往的有制服皮肤，一如既往的温温柔柔的做完服务，一如既往的可以🐍，而且做起来小穴还是很紧致很水润，完全和刚下水的时候没什么两样。嫩妹最关键的点就是润，综合的概括词，并不只是单单的紧，也不只是单单的水多，要和年纪，皮肤的状态，本身的体态，叫床的羞耻感，以及那种抽插时独属于小妹子的敏感度和包裹感配合起来，才配得上一个润字。在宜昌玩过最润的是贝贝，是恩施人。在恩施玩过最润的，是欣儿却是外地人🤷🏼♂️ 喜欢的妹的无脑冲吧，恩施好的ls不多，欣儿绝对算一个 【老师名…
【验证留名】：匿名 【评价时间】：2026-08-13 【颜值评分】： 【环境评分】： 【态度评分】： 【服务评分】： 【人照评分】： 【身材频道】： 【描述过程】：看了头一个评价，本来抱着犹豫的心态去的，预约了老师，到了以后准时开课，不存在那个说的东西，人家就是支教老师，好不容易来个像样的老师就不要一张嘴乱叫了，而且那个大师，以前还发过他有妹子，深切怀疑他就是中介，课表的服务都有，人照9分，皮肤也白，值得出击 【老师名字】：妖娆
❤1
【验证留名】：匿名 【评价时间】：2026-08-09 【颜值评分】： 【环境评分】： 【态度评分】： 【服务评分】： 【人照评分】： 【身材频道】： 【描述过程】：一进门老师非常热情，贴心的拿了水。然后帮忙洗澡，也很细致。躺好后老师开始服务，先口一下子就起立了，戴上开干。很湿也很润，和老师一起达到了高潮，还给老师整喷水了。有点不好意思还得让老师洗床单，综合评价给到夯。 【老师名字】：小甜甜
❤1
【验证留名】：匿名 【评价时间】：2026-08-06 【颜值评分】： 【环境评分】： 【态度评分】： 【服务评分】： 【人照评分】： 【身材频道】： 【描述过程】：蓄谋已久的出击，甜甜酱真是嫩啊。馋了好久的老师，今天终于约到了头钟，火速赶往老师的教室，到了之后看见老师身穿连衣裙和黑色小腿袜。二弟立刻起立（易立体质）然后就和老师一起去洗，老师会体贴地问水温合不合适。洗完上床就问需要吹嘛。老司机当然不会火急火燎。我申请亲一亲舔一舔老师的酥胸，老师胸很大，奶头很小，舔了几分钟，立起来才豆豆大小，然后用手指轻轻的按摩老师的阴蒂，给老师爽的哇哇乱叫，该说不说老师的叫声是真的又骚又夹，一直嘴里喊着哥哥你就玩我吧，看来也是个敏感体质。前戏搞了几分钟就开始让老师步入正题，老师开始吹，小嘴一含住直接升天，也很听话，听指挥，我让她屁股对着我吹，虽然没有69，但是我的手一直也在按摩她的阴蒂，给她爽的屁股直扭，水都流了不少。也很懂节奏，屁股一拍就知道…
【验证留名】：匿名 【评价时间】：2026-08-04 【颜值评分】： 【环境评分】： 【态度评分】： 【服务评分】： 【人照评分】： 【身材频道】： 【描述过程】：今天电报第一次出击交给了好评榜第一的小曼老师，一进门就知道这趟来对了。首先映入眼帘的就是一个穿着小连衣裙的靓丽少女，眼睛笑眯眯的将我迎进门。小曼老师非常热情的提供了陪浴服务，在小曼老师小手的爱抚下，我的小兄弟也不争气的挺立起来。洗漱过罢赶紧上床，小曼老师也脱下小连衣裙，光溜溜的胴了体给我眼睛都看直了。本人喜爱🐍吻，小曼马上送上香舌跟我激情相拥。🐍饱之后，老师又送上热情的口活，连蛋蛋都照顾到位。我的小兄弟此时已经硬得不行了，赶紧戴上套套，让老师坐上来，慢慢抽送。。。此处省略一万字。总之就是一个词，通透！小曼老师的颜值，身材和服务都是顶中顶，可以说此次不虚此行。下次还来！ 【老师名字】：小曼
【验证留名】：Jaso 【评价时间】：2026-08-04 【颜值评分】： 【环境评分】： 【态度评分】： 【服务评分】： 【人照评分】： 【身材频道】： 【描述过程】：约的老师二次，在榜上看见还不错就期待见到老师，上楼开门，开门眼前一看，大长腿老师身材实属于丰满型的，天然大胸奶头小小的，喜欢的可以冲，做的时候水挺多的，服务很好 很满意，个子1.7左右，位置也好找 【老师名字】：甜甜酱
【验证留名】：果农 【评价时间】：2026-08-03 【颜值评分】： 【环境评分】： 【态度评分】： 【服务评分】： 【人照评分】： 【身材频道】： 【描述过程】：约了甜甜酱老师，老师穿了一件短裙和黑丝，一脸笑意叫我进屋，还给我拿了一瓶水，挺细心，简单洗漱一下开始服务，老师含情脉脉的含住我的二弟开始舔，口活非常好没有齿感，舔一会儿鸡吧老师把衣服裤子脱掉，露出一双大胸，扒在我身上亲吻我的乳头，用手挑逗另一个胸，之后又趴下去口我鸡吧，一边吃鸡吧一边用手指划过我的胸，很有感觉，很快我就硬了，让老师躺下开搞，一插进去包裹感很强，夹的很紧，老师表情很诱惑，叫声也带感，做爱过程中老师会忍不住主动抱着我的头，摸我的胸，之后换后入干，累了又换回啪啪，服务很热情操她的时候主动亲我的胸，抱着我的头舔我的耳朵，听着一边舔我耳朵一边在我耳朵边上伸吟，不自觉插的更卖力了，时间久了老师也不催，最后出货完事，在老师屋里休息了一下走人回家，体验很满意 【老师…
【验证留名】：锦记 【评价时间】：2026-08-01 【颜值评分】： 【环境评分】： 【态度评分】： 【服务评分】： 【人照评分】： 【身材频道】： 【描述过程】：妹妹很可爱很嫩说话声音好听人也好看，闲聊了几分钟有一种和你女朋友聊天的感觉没脾气好说话随后开始办事了妹妹给我jj口的好硬了我把妹妹一把抱住开始了叫床功夫不错声音骚有时候说哥哥轻点太进去了我就越有成就感，都挺配合的不错不错小妹妹一只 【老师名字】：甜甜酱
【验证留名】：匿名 【评价时间】：2026-07-31 【颜值评分】： 【环境评分】： 【态度评分】： 【服务评分】： 【人照评分】： 【身材频道】： 【描述过程】：今天初次体验小曼老师的课程，进门之时便深感惊艳。小曼老师容貌出众，言谈举止极为温柔。随后她为我沐浴，并在卧榻之上提供口部服务，其间不时发出婉转的呻吟，令人倍感愉悦。继而进行观音坐莲的体位，那敏感的触感实在令人难以自持。事毕之后，她再次为我沐浴，随后与我并排卧床交谈，小曼老师实乃一位极善言辞之人。至第二次时，她身着黑色丝袜与性感内衣，与我行房事。临别之际，小曼老师紧紧相拥并亲吻告别。诚然，小曼老师是一位值得极力推荐的服务提供者。 【老师名字】：小曼
【验证留名】：我要验牌 【评价时间】：2026-07-30 【颜值评分】： 【环境评分】： 【态度评分】： 【服务评分】： 【人照评分】： 【身材频道】： 【描述过程】：第二次出击小曼老师，比起第一次，少了几分羞涩，多了几分熟悉，进门不催着交水费，而是抱抱贴贴，聊了会儿天，交完水费后帮洗浴，然后就是🐍，👄，69，各种姿势试遍，然后升华😌😌😌。依然是十分推荐 【老师名字】：小曼
【验证留名】：HenTai 【评价时间】：2026-07-30 【颜值评分】： 【环境评分】： 【态度评分】： 【服务评分】： 【人照评分】： 【身材频道】： 【描述过程】：人美声甜，服务热情态度好，虽然没有莞式的这么多，但是课表上的服务配合度高，感觉非常适合，好评如潮🥰 【老师名字】：小曼
❤1
【验证留名】：匿名 【评价时间】：2026-07-22 【颜值评分】： 【环境评分】： 【态度评分】： 【服务评分】： 【人照评分】： 【身材频道】： 【描述过程】：人照六七分吧 身材还可以 年纪感觉是小嫂子了 肯定不是26 没有制服 没有陪浴 没有一次性浴巾 感觉老师应该是刚开课不久 【老师名字】：小水
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @enshixcbg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 773,347 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“恩施修车报告” (@enshixcbg), 351 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/enshixcbg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.