Channel
@enlightenyourheart
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
16subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001342177070 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @enlightenyourheart |
| Description | My thoughts, My feelings, My words, Here I will paint my words on this white Canvas. 💛 Hope you will like it :) |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 10 January 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/enlightenyourheart |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Oct 2026, 13:22 | 16 | no change |
| 10 Oct 2026, 12:47 | 16 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 January 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 January 2020. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
AsSalamuAlaikum wa rahmatullahi wa barkatahu Dear Brothers and Sisters Alhamdulillah few years back my mom accepted Islam as well But she is currently facing few serious problems with the certificates which can end with her getting into prison, not just that... our hard earned money n properties can be seized because she has different names in different certificates which goes against the law and constitution of In…
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
The very first Question we'll be asked about.!! 🥺
Photo, posted without a caption
#mustwatch #inspiring #motivational https://t.me/inspiringthoughts/5933
ISLAMIC FACT Were humans👥 able to cast a look👀 at Paradise and what is there, they would never enjoy anything in this transient world
The Qur'an is a book revealed from the Creator of mankind to all of mankind You owe it to yourself to read the Quran and you have nothing to lose but everything to gain
Photo, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
We are living in the world of Shamelessness 😔 A short and brief comic clip (#video) of lowering the gaze... قُلۡ لِّلۡمُؤۡمِنِیۡنَ یَغُضُّوۡا مِنۡ اَبۡصَارِہِمۡ وَ یَحۡفَظُوۡا فُرُوۡجَہُمۡ ؕ ذٰلِکَ اَزۡکٰی لَہُمۡ ؕ اِنَّ اللّٰہَ خَبِیۡرٌۢ بِمَا یَصۡنَعُوۡنَ ﴿۳۰﴾ Tell the believing men to reduce some of their vision and guard their private parts. That is purer for them. Indeed, Allah is Acquainted with what the…
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @enlightenyourheart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@enlightenyourheart named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Enlighten your heart” (@enlightenyourheart), 16 subscribers as measured 10 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/enlightenyourheart.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.