Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Enjoyer Gambles

Channel

Enjoyer Gambles

@enjoyergamble

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,377subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002214032288
TypeChannel
Username@enjoyergamble
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/enjoyergamble

Growth

1,3771,3831,3806 August 2026 — 1,383 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,382 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,379 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,377 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,376–1,384 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 01:431,377-2
10 Aug 2026, 16:121,379-3
7 Aug 2026, 19:161,382-1
6 Aug 2026, 22:031,383first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 8 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
49.6%
avg views ÷ 1,377 subscribers
Avg views / post
684
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
16
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held19 (8 July 202631 July 2026)
Views total10,938
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 22:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 23:16 UTC422 viewsread 6 August 2026

So basically you vote for your project using $groyp tokens, and if your project wins-it gets launchpad Friday revenue buybacks

31 Jul 2026, 23:14 UTC431 viewsread 6 August 2026

You can vote for a project ONLY with $groyp tokens, and 50% of tokens gonna be burned Easy 1 more stream of buybacks for groyp

31 Jul 2026, 23:14 UTC325 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

🥹TOPBLAST FRIDAY is here! 🧠Since launching Parabola, we've been blown away by the overwhelming response and rapid adoption across the TON trenches. The community spoke, and we listened - so we're going all in. 🥹Introducing a brand-new concept to the topblast.lol ecosystem: Topblast Friday. Topblast Friday rules: - All of Friday's Topblast revenue goes towards a buyback of the most voted token. Buyback size exclude

31 Jul 2026, 14:09 UTC655 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Yep, you guys are just blind, best option to invest right in front of your eyes

29 Jul 2026, 22:49 UTC708 viewsread 6 August 2026

Groyp is only 3kk now, even cherry same marketcap, and team buybacks it everyday around 1000 ton, so imagine where will it be in half a year🫤 Groyp 10kk very soon EQAtwo6qMNwtr0iTA9eKVZ32cuACFJ0VKd78GrBWOe83-X1P

28 Jul 2026, 21:20 UTC821 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

I bought EQAm4z_0T3tCptaEVz3I8P9UHJAmX6PwJ8HK6K0AIN0XWj0E

28 Jul 2026, 13:28 UTC482 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Why is $GROYP undervalued below $100m? Why is $GRAM the best ecosystem to position yourself early? This is not a STREAM you should miss. Today at 6 PM UTC. w/ @yugoslavac @larrryyy @frag @plug PULL UP! https://x.com/Giooton/status/2082090591085593024?s=20

26 Jul 2026, 19:49 UTC660 viewsread 6 August 2026

You will just watch and not buy, and fomo eats you more more and more

26 Jul 2026, 19:33 UTC593 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

🟩 GROYP BUY - 💎 Ston.fi 🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹 💎 2,000 Gram ($3,020) | +8.4% 🪙 48,792.93 GROYP 💵 Price: $0.0636 🏦 FDV: $3.18M | 💧 LP: $152.35K 👤 UQAH...7QTu | 2,754.09 Gram 📊 Dexscreener | 👁️ Transaction 📌 Tracker | 🔥 Trending 📈 ST | 📈 MA | 📈 GB | 📈 DT4 | 📈 TS

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @enjoyergamble. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 693,518 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Enjoyer Gambles” (@enjoyergamble), 1,377 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/enjoyergamble.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.