https://youtu.be/8e2aktlYMWU @enhypen2020
❤266🥰25👍19🔥9😁9👏5🤩1
Signed daphne🧸 || ia studying
![Telegram profile photo for ENHYPEN INTERNATIONAL [REST]](https://cdn.tgregister.com/av/c0/c03dd42ca3f2c67e8a5b75c4f0172543272ca75876b4e1af60d1c19eea906556.jpg)
Channel
@enhypen2020
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8,430subscribers
-66 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001458347710 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @enhypen2020 |
| Description | 1 2, ᴄᴏɴɴᴇᴄᴛ ʜᴇʟʟᴏ ᴡᴇ ᴀʀᴇ ᴇɴʜʏᴘᴇɴ ᴇɴɢᴇɴᴇꜱ ᴇɴʜʏᴘᴇɴ ꜱᴏɴɢꜱ - @EnhypenAlbum ᴀʟʟ ᴇɴʜʏᴘᴇɴ ꜰɪʟᴇꜱ - @EnhypenFiles ᴄᴏɴᴛᴀᴄᴛ ᴀᴅᴍɪɴ - @enhypen_bot ᴇɴᴊᴏʏ ᴜʀ ꜱᴛᴀʏ💝 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/enhypen2020 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 15:26 | 8,430 | -7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 13:53 | 8,437 | -14 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:38 | 8,451 | -9 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 23:25 | 8,460 | -6 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:42 | 8,466 | -9 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:23 | 8,475 | -13 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:36 | 8,488 | -8 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:00 | 8,496 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:57 | 8,496 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 August 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 August 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
2,249 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,973 | 87.7% | |
| 🥰 | 127 | 5.65% | |
| 👍 | 106 | 4.71% | |
| 🔥 | 17 | 0.756% | |
| 👏 | 12 | 0.534% | |
| 😁 | 12 | 0.534% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.044% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.044% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,249reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2022 to 23 August 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://youtu.be/8e2aktlYMWU @enhypen2020
❤266🥰25👍19🔥9😁9👏5🤩1
Signed daphne🧸 || ia studying
In Ethiopia, social media has become one of the main ways people follow news and events. But I keep asking myself: Is it helping us understand each other better, or is it making divisions stronger? During difficult times, the most emotional and extreme content often spreads the fastest — whether it is fully true or not. I’m curious to hear your thoughts: Do you think social media is helping or worsening situations…
❤91👍24
Signed daphne🧸 || ia studying
ENHYPEN at KCON 2022 IN LA MAIN SHOW ⏰ 12:00PM KST, 11:00AM PHT, 8:00PM PDT, 11:00PM EST 🔗 https://m.twitch.tv/shiningstarhwa_ 🔗 https://m.twitch.tv/jayelotito 🔗 https://m.twitch.tv/intoheeki 🔗 https://m.twitch.tv/fafifufeo 🔗 https://m.twitch.tv/jungwoncatto 🔗 https://m.twitch.tv/moonlightsum_ 🔗 https://m.twitch.tv/bl0bfishspand3x 🔗 https://m.twitch.tv/linobratz 🔗 https://m.twitch.tv/hoonzism 🔗 https://m.twitch.tv/…
❤120👍14👏5🥰1
Signed daphne🧸 || ia studying
Living in Ethiopia, I’ve been thinking a lot about how social media shapes the way we understand what’s happening around us. During times of tension, information spreads very quickly — but not all of it is accurate. Sometimes what we see online can make situations feel more extreme, more divided, or more hopeless than they really are. I’ve noticed that people often share posts immediately, especially when they are …
❤117👍8🥰7👏1
Signed daphne🧸 || ia studying
Quick question for everyone: Do you think social media in Ethiopia contributes more to: 👍 Awareness ❤️ Division 🥰 Both Feel free to explain your answer — I’m really interested in different perspectives.
❤108🥰8👍7
Signed daphne🧸
https://youtu.be/VIFZjD14r8Q @enhypen2020
❤91🥰6👍2😱1
Signed daphne🧸
One thing I’ve observed in Ethiopia is that social media doesn’t just share information — it shapes how we see each other. When people are constantly exposed to one-sided or exaggerated content, it can slowly influence their opinions and emotions, often without them realizing it. Over time, this can increase misunderstanding and reduce empathy between communities. Being aware of this is important. Not everything w…
❤90🥰6👍2
Signed daphne🧸
https://youtu.be/CK_1RUFofJA @enhypen2020
❤93🥰11👍2🔥2😁2👏1
Signed daphne🧸
https://youtu.be/9MYR6PhaQ_Y @enhypen2020
❤70👍5🥰5
Signed daphne🧸
https://youtu.be/Tt_HfGbV0uY @enhypen2020
❤91🥰7👍5🔥1
Signed daphne🧸
https://youtu.be/Pfq37N3eA7g @enhypen2020
❤95🥰3👍1
Signed daphne🧸
https://youtu.be/I7R3LyAk4p8 @enhypen2020
❤73🥰5👍1
Signed daphne🧸
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @enhypen2020. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ENHYPEN INTERNATIONAL [REST]” (@enhypen2020), 8,430 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/enhypen2020.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.