Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Английский с Englishweb.ru

Channel

Английский с Englishweb.ru

@englishwebru

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

866subscribers

+59 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001162798583
TypeChannel
Username@englishwebru
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 October 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/englishwebru

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

807866836.57 August 2026 — 807 subscribers8 August 2026 — 807 subscribers16 August 2026 — 815 subscribers23 August 2026 — 823 subscribers30 August 2026 — 822 subscribers8 September 2026 — 824 subscribers16 September 2026 — 832 subscribers30 September 2026 — 846 subscribers11 October 2026 — 866 subscribers7 August 202611 October 2026
9 measurements spanning 64 days, net +59. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 798–875 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Oct 2026, 04:58866+20
30 Sept 2026, 23:22846+14
16 Sept 2026, 22:18832+8
8 Sept 2026, 06:38824+2
30 Aug 2026, 14:37822-1
23 Aug 2026, 20:45823+8
16 Aug 2026, 16:28815+8
8 Aug 2026, 01:34807no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:02807first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

92 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3841.3%
❤3032.6%
🔥1415.2%
👏44.35%
🎉33.26%
👌33.26%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 92 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC45 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🧠 Since или for Since отвечает на вопрос «с какого момента». I have lived here since 2020. Я живу здесь с 2020 года. For отвечает на вопрос «как долго». I have lived here for four years. Я живу здесь четыре года. Мини-правило: since + точка во времени for + период Englishweb.ru

❤1

6 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC61 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

✈️ Как спросить дорогу Самый простой вариант: How do I get to the station? Как мне добраться до станции? Чуть вежливее: Could you tell me how to get to the station? Не могли бы вы сказать, как добраться до станции? Если ищете конкретное место: Where is the nearest ATM? Где ближайший банкомат? nearest значит ближайший. Englishweb.ru

👍3❤1🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC64 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📌 Fun или funny Fun, когда что-то весёлое или приятное. The party was fun. Вечеринка была весёлой. Funny, когда что-то смешное. This joke is funny. Эта шутка смешная. Ошибка: The party was funny. Так можно сказать, если вечеринка была странно-смешной, а не просто классной. Englishweb.ru

❤4🎉1🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC76 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🧩 Как сказать «я привык» Не I am used. Правильно: I am used to it. Я привык к этому. После used to нужен существительный вариант: I am used to waking up early. Я привык рано вставать. I am used to speaking English. Я привык говорить по-английски. Формула: be used to + noun или -ing Englishweb.ru

👍2🎉1👏1

3 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC82 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

😋 Very good можно заменить Very good нормально, но звучит слишком базово. Попробуйте: great отлично excellent превосходно impressive впечатляюще That was a great answer. Это был отличный ответ. Your pronunciation is impressive. Твоё произношение впечатляет. Englishweb.ru

2 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC83 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📱 Reply или answer Оба слова про ответ, но есть нюанс. Answer чаще про вопрос. Please answer my question. Пожалуйста, ответь на мой вопрос. Reply чаще про сообщение, письмо или комментарий. She replied to my message. Она ответила на моё сообщение. Если сомневаетесь: answer a question reply to a message Englishweb.ru

👍3🔥2

1 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC73 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

⚡ A little или a few A little используется с тем, что нельзя посчитать поштучно. I have a little time. У меня есть немного времени. A few используется с тем, что можно посчитать. I have a few questions. У меня есть несколько вопросов. Time, money, water, advice чаще идут с a little. Questions, books, friends, mistakes идут с a few. Englishweb.ru

👌2🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 06:00 UTC93 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎯 Как звучать увереннее Вместо I think иногда лучше сказать: I believe я считаю In my opinion по моему мнению It seems to me мне кажется Пример: I think it is a good idea. Нормально. I believe it is a good idea. Звучит увереннее. In my opinion, it is a good idea. Звучит спокойнее и официальнее. Englishweb.ru

👍4❤1🔥1

30 Jul 2026, 06:00 UTC101 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

⚡ A little или few A little используется с тем, что нельзя посчитать поштучно. I have a little time. У меня есть немного времени. Few используется с тем, что можно посчитать. I have a few questions. У меня есть несколько вопросов. Time, money, water, advice чаще идут с a little. Questions, books, friends, mistakes идут с a few. Englishweb.ru

❤2

29 Jul 2026, 06:00 UTC107 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🗣 Как сказать «я не против» Не переводите дословно как I am not against. В обычной речи чаще говорят: I don't mind. Я не против. Do you mind if I open the window? Ты не против, если я открою окно? No, I don't mind. Нет, я не против. Важный момент: No здесь означает разрешение. No, I don't mind. Да, открывай. Englishweb.ru

👌1

28 Jul 2026, 06:00 UTC105 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📌 Borrow или lend Borrow, когда вы берёте. Lend, когда вы даёте. Can I borrow your pen? Можно я возьму твою ручку? Can you lend me your pen? Можешь одолжить мне ручку? Смысл один, направление разное. Я беру у тебя, borrow. Ты даёшь мне, lend. Проверьте себя: I borrowed money from Alex. Alex lent me money. Englishweb.ru

👍3

27 Jul 2026, 06:00 UTC101 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

😬 I am agree По-русски хочется сказать «я согласен» как I am agree. Но agree это глагол. Правильно: I agree. Я согласен. I agree with you. Я согласен с тобой. I totally agree. Полностью согласен. А вот I am согласуется с прилагательными: I am ready. Я готов. I am sure. Я уверен. Englishweb.ru

🔥4❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @englishwebru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Английский с Englishweb.ru” (@englishwebru), 866 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/englishwebru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.