Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

English Tochka

@englishtochka

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

13,170subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001341416070
TypeChannel
Username@englishtochka
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/englishtochka

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@aleksrubanov/146231 Dec 2025, 17:01 UTC@englishtochka/6475 · this entry31 Dec 2025, 17:02 UTC1.0072 seconds
@aleksrubanov/14646 Jan 2026, 11:11 UTC@englishtochka/6478 · this entry6 Jan 2026, 11:12 UTC1.00under a minute
@englishtochka/6484 · this entry11 Feb 2026, 14:16 UTC@aleksrubanov/146817 Feb 2026, 13:28 UTC1.006 days
@englishtochka/6490 · this entry24 Mar 2026, 08:04 UTC@aleksrubanov/147124 Mar 2026, 08:05 UTC1.00under a minute
@aleksrubanov/14658 Jan 2026, 17:41 UTC@englishtochka/6479 · this entry8 Jan 2026, 17:42 UTC0.98under a minute
@aleksrubanov/146616 Jan 2026, 13:35 UTC@englishtochka/6482 · this entry16 Jan 2026, 13:35 UTC0.98under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@aleksrubanov13 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.99under a minute@aleksrubanov (103)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 10 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 31 December 2025 to 12 April 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @aleksrubanov. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

13,16813,17613,1726 August 2026 — 13,176 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,173 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,172 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,168 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,169 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,170 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,171 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,170 subscribers13,1706 August 202613 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,167–13,177 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 00:0413,170-1
11 Aug 2026, 23:3213,171+1
10 Aug 2026, 22:3113,170+1
9 Aug 2026, 23:3413,169+1
9 Aug 2026, 01:3013,168-4
8 Aug 2026, 02:1113,172-1
7 Aug 2026, 05:0913,173-3
6 Aug 2026, 06:4513,176first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 31 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

184 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9953.8%
👍6535.3%
🔥179.24%
🤔31.63%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 184reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2025 to 12 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Apr 2026, 07:24 UTC≈3,130 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Если коротко: мы собрали весь английский English Tochka в одном месте. Без поиска. Без хаоса. Без лишнего. Внутри: 📚 все уровни 🎥 записи занятий 📝 памятки ➕ короткие спецкурсы по темам Вы просто открываете и начинаете. Стоимость — 5000₽. 👉 Получить доступ: https://c.cloudpayments.ru/payments/0107e0c0e90848e4a0ebf1642bffc33e Поддержка: @English_Tochka01

👍53

11 Apr 2026, 04:59 UTC≈2,840 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

А если бы у вас был весь английский в одном месте? Без поиска по YouTube, без сохранённых «на потом» видео, без хаоса в материалах. Мы сделали именно такой формат — архив English Tochka. Это таблица со ссылками, где уже собрано: 📚 все уровни от Beginner до Advanced 🎥 записи занятий 📝 памятки ➕ специальные курсы с короткими видео по темам Вы просто открываете и учитесь. В своём темпе. В любое время. Можно идти по

2🔥1

26 Mar 2026, 09:48 UTC≈2,840 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Вы долго просили — и мы сделали. Мы добавили детские курсы в формате отдельного архива English Tochka 👶 Теперь доступны два архива: 📚 Архив для взрослых — уровни от Beginner до Advanced; — записи занятий, видео, памятки; — специальные курсы. 👶 Детский архив — видеоуроки для детей по всем уровням; — материалы и памятки. Это два отдельных продукта, каждый со своей структурой и программой. Стоимость: — взрослый архи

2🔥1

24 Mar 2026, 08:04 UTC≈2,040 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

В архиве English Tochka есть не только основные уровни 👇 Мы также добавили специальные курсы — короткие видео и памятки на разные темы. Это формат, который помогает быстро закрывать конкретные задачи: — разобрать грамматику — подтянуть лексику — повторить сложные темы — освежить знания В итоге вы получаете: 📚 все уровни от Beginner до Advanced 🎥 записи занятий 📝 памятки ➕ специальные курсы с короткими видео и ма

5

13 Mar 2026, 11:43 UTC≈2,040 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Иногда английский не получается не потому, что сложно, а потому что нет одного места, где всё собрано. У кого-то отдельные видео, у кого-то учебники, у кого-то заметки. Поэтому мы сделали простой формат: архив всех материалов English Tochka. Это одна таблица со ссылками, внутри которой: — материалы всех уровней — записи занятий — видео и объяснения — памятки и дополнительные материалы Вы просто открываете таблиц

👍31

10 Mar 2026, 10:20 UTC≈1,930 viewsread 12 August 2026

Главный плюс архива English Tochka - вы учитесь без давления и расписаний. Не нужно подстраиваться под уроки. Не нужно ждать группы. Вы просто открываете таблицу и выбираете материал: - грамматика - словарь - уроки - задания И двигаетесь в своём темпе. Стоимость доступа — 5000₽. 👉 Получить архив: https://c.cloudpayments.ru/payments/0107e0c0e90848e4a0ebf1642bffc33e Если появятся вопросы по доступу — напишите в

2 Mar 2026, 09:03 UTC≈2,160 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Многие спрашивают, что именно внутри архива English Tochka. Отвечаем: 📚 все уровни английского 🎥 записи занятий 📝 памятки и материалы 📂 всё собрано в одной таблице со ссылками Это формат, который позволяет учиться спокойно, без расписания и обязательств. Один доступ — 5000₽. После оплаты вы сразу получаете ссылку. 👉 Забрать архив: https://c.cloudpayments.ru/payments/0107e0c0e90848e4a0ebf1642bffc33e Если ссылка

8

17 Feb 2026, 13:27 UTC≈2,420 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

АРХИВ КУРСОВ ENGLISH TOCHKA — доступ открыт Если вы откладывали английский «на потом» или хотели спокойно разобрать базу — сейчас можно получить все материалы школы в одном месте. В архиве: — уровни от Beginner до Advanced — записи занятий — видео и памятки — материалы для самостоятельного обучения Вы сами выбираете уровень и темп. Без подписок и обязательств. Стоимость доступа — 5000₽. После оплаты вы сразу полу

👍145🤔3

13 Feb 2026, 08:26 UTC≈2,310 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026

«А это правда все уровни?» Да. В архиве — материалы от Beginner до Advanced. Это не один курс. Это вся база English Tochka в одной таблице: — записи уроков — видео — памятки — материалы для самостоятельного повторения Вы сами выбираете уровень. Сами выбираете темп. Сами решаете, что проходить. Стоимость доступа — 5000₽. Если давно хотели спокойно разобрать английский и иметь всё под рукой — это тот самый формат

👍102

11 Feb 2026, 14:16 UTC≈2,310 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

АРХИВ КУРСОВ ENGLISH TOCHKA Если вы когда-то думали: «Вот бы иметь все материалы в одном месте» — то это именно оно. Мы собрали весь архив English Tochka в одной удобной таблице со ссылками: — все уровни от Beginner до Advanced — записи уроков — видео — памятки и материалы Без преподавателей и поддержки — чистая база знаний для самостоятельного обучения. Оплачиваете один раз — получаете доступ сразу. 👉 Получить

13

20 Jan 2026, 14:53 UTC≈2,800 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Понимаю, но не говорю Попробуй сделать это прямо сейчас 👇 Ответь на вопрос: 👉 What do you usually do after work? Не идеально. Не долго. Одним предложением. I usually watch videos. I rest. I meet my friends. Если ты понимаешь вопрос, но сложно сразу ответить — значит, проблема не в знаниях, а в практике. Английский начинает работать только тогда, когда ты регулярно говоришь, а не просто изучаешь правила. В Engl

6👍6

16 Jan 2026, 13:35 UTC≈2,500 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Рабочая неделя уже позади. Ты снова в ритме, в задачах, в сообщениях, в дедлайнах. И именно в такие моменты становится понятно, что действительно важно оставить в своей жизни на постоянной основе. Не как цель «на потом», а как привычку, которая работает в обычные дни. Если английский — про карьеру, уверенность и свободу общения, ему тоже нужен удобный формат, а не место в списке несбывшихся обещаний. В English To

5👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @englishtochka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,133,430 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“English Tochka” (@englishtochka), 13,170 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/englishtochka.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.