KELAS DAH BUKA! Jom masuk ke kelas kalau nak tahu Guided Writing dan Listening. Akses kelas: https://ptti-my.zoom.us/j/98313513282?pwd=SaRtvSqiM1l02pdr5eQZKtx6VXVZPA.1 Passcode:123456
❤3
Signed Arron

Channel
@englishspmnotes
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
38,045subscribers
+2,618 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001110208271 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @englishspmnotes |
| Description | This channel belongs to @thespmneticofficial, and a platform for sharing notes and exercises 🤘🏻 For any enquiries, please directly ask in our discussion group ✨ |
| Created | Between 1 February 2017 and 31 December 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 64 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/englishspmnotes |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 9 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 8 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @bahasamelayuspmnotes/1250322 Aug 2026, 07:18 UTC | @englishspmnotes/10776 · this entry22 Aug 2026, 07:18 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @bahasamelayuspmnotes/127845 Oct 2026, 14:21 UTC | @englishspmnotes/11120 · this entry5 Oct 2026, 14:21 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @bahasamelayuspmnotes/1313631 Oct 2026, 11:49 UTC | @englishspmnotes/11331 · this entry31 Oct 2026, 12:19 UTC | 1.00 | 30 minutes |
| @biologyspmnotes/181133 Oct 2026, 16:01 UTC | @englishspmnotes/11103 · this entry3 Oct 2026, 16:34 UTC | 1.00 | 34 minutes |
| @biologyspmnotes/181244 Oct 2026, 16:02 UTC | @englishspmnotes/11113 · this entry4 Oct 2026, 16:17 UTC | 1.00 | 14 minutes |
| @biologyspmnotes/181385 Oct 2026, 14:21 UTC | @englishspmnotes/11120 · this entry5 Oct 2026, 14:21 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @bahasamelayuspmnotes | 18 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (12–6) |
| @biologyspmnotes | 21 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 34 minutes | @biologyspmnotes (15–6) |
| @chemistryspmnotes | 22 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 34 minutes | @chemistryspmnotes (16–6) |
| @notephilicc | 7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 20 minutes | @notephilicc (4–3) |
| @sirrace | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.99 | 19 minutes | this entry (3–2) |
| @thespmneticofficial | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 3.4 hours | @thespmneticofficial (6–0) |
| @pendidikanislamspmnotes | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (4–1) |
| @accountspmnotes | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (3–2) |
| @sciencespmnotes | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @sciencespmnotes (3–2) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 30 of the 30 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 160 comparable posts for this entry, running 21 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 8 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @accountspmnotes. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 8 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 07:01 | 38,045 | +14 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 16:07 | 38,031 | -1 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 10:29 | 38,032 | +18 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 07:26 | 38,014 | +11 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 09:19 | 38,003 | +5 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 09:08 | 37,998 | +79 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 07:37 | 37,919 | +216 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 04:19 | 37,703 | +280 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 04:39 | 37,423 | +242 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 05:28 | 37,181 | +151 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 04:20 | 37,030 | +111 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 01:32 | 36,919 | +117 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 02:39 | 36,802 | +92 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 04:38 | 36,710 | +63 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 01:48 | 36,647 | +5 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 01:28 | 36,642 | +5 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 00:37 | 36,637 | +20 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 00:27 | 36,617 | +2 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 22:56 | 36,615 | +27 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 14:46 | 36,588 | first reading |
579 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 178 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 164 of 242 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 579 (21 July 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 677,540 |
| Reactions total | 3,518 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 15:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5,968 reactions across 353 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4,657 | 78.0% | |
| 🔥 | 390 | 6.53% | |
| 👍 | 318 | 5.33% | |
| 😢 | 277 | 4.64% | |
| 🤯 | 107 | 1.79% | |
| 😱 | 54 | 0.905% | |
| 🥰 | 51 | 0.855% | |
| 👏 | 37 | 0.62% | |
| 🤩 | 37 | 0.62% | |
| 🤔 | 17 | 0.285% | |
| 🎉 | 12 | 0.201% | |
| 😁 | 11 | 0.184% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 403 of the 579 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,968 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 579 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 31 of 245 posts held from the last 30 days (12.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
KELAS DAH BUKA! Jom masuk ke kelas kalau nak tahu Guided Writing dan Listening. Akses kelas: https://ptti-my.zoom.us/j/98313513282?pwd=SaRtvSqiM1l02pdr5eQZKtx6VXVZPA.1 Passcode:123456
❤3
Signed Arron
Countdown SPM: 12 days left (1 minggu 5 hari) Chase, achieve and live the dream you've been wishing for - by 67 lover
❤27
Signed Dhanyaa
Batch 09, lagi 2 minggu nak SPM. Mana sempat nak kejar semua bab? 😭 Jom fokus ulang kaji dengan soalan ramalan SPM PTTI dan teknik jawab dalam Seminar Target SPM (STAR) 2026. 📅 19 November – 16 Disember 2026 Yo guys, Jason (5 Radium) here! Just wanted to pass along a solid tip for our SPM preparation, check out PTTI’s STAR (Seminar Target SPM) ramalan sessions. A few of our seniors told me it was damn helpful for…
❤3🔥1
Signed Arron
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
Signed Arron
📌 Aplikasi Khas Untuk Calon SPM 2026 Jom buat latih tubi soalan percubaan SPM dengan aplikasi EduBijak! • Koleksi soalan trial negeri tahun-tahun lepas (15,000+ soalan) • Jawapan dengan penjelasan yang lengkap • 11 subjek SPM teras dan elektif • 100% percuma selamanya Bersedia awal untuk keputusan yang cemerlang 💪️ 👉 https://at.edv.my/edubijak-spm27
❤3
Signed Arron
Countdown SPM: 14 days left (2 minggu) Selagi belum masuk dewan spm jangan tarik handbrake - by nathrisha
❤11
Signed jniiniaa
Countdown SPM: 13 days left (1 minggu 6 hari) As the chinese say, you plant what, you get what, if you study smart then you get fantastic result
😢42❤17😱4
Signed jniiniaa
Happy Deepavali to all those who celebrate, and happy holidays to those who don't. May this day be commemorated with joy, laughter and hope! Just as light conquers darkness, we can overcome the upcoming SPM exams with steady effort and focus. 🔥🔥
❤81
Signed Dhanyaa
Countdown SPM: 15 days left (2 minggu 1 hari) How many years have we suffered to get here? It's the final stretch.
❤13
Signed Dhanyaa
writing meetings!!! Friday, 6 Nov to Monday, 9 Nov Google Meet joining info Video call link: https://meet.google.com/pwf-ouvp-zfj
❤2
Signed Ar
WAIT, WAIT, WAITTTT!! You thought we were done?!! THE WRITING CLASS IS COMING!!! Prepare your brains because we’re going to have LOADS of exciting activities! No boring lectures — just learning, competing, challenging ourselves and upgrading YOUR ENGLISH WRITING SKILLS! EVERYONE IS WELCOME TO JOIN THIS CLASS! The more, the merrier! LET’S WRITE TO IMPRESS!!! Let’s capture our examiners’ attention with remarkab…
❤32🔥8
Signed Arron
Personally, I got triggered by the HOTS question but managed to (somewhat) pull through🥲
😢20❤4
Signed Dhanyaa
Showing the 12 most recent of 579 posts we hold for @englishspmnotes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 99 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Answer
The shares total 119%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
to day 1 peeps, how was it ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
36.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
35.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
34.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
33.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 579 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“English Spmnetic!™ 📝” (@englishspmnotes), 38,045 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/englishspmnotes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.