Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for English with Step To Wisdom

Channel

English with Step To Wisdom

@english_steptowisdom

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

31subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001274660258
TypeChannel
Username@english_steptowisdom
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/english_steptowisdom

Growth

313432.56 August 2026 — 34 subscribers11 August 2026 — 34 subscribers14 August 2026 — 33 subscribers21 August 2026 — 32 subscribers7 September 2026 — 31 subscribers6 August 20267 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 31 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31–34 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 00:4031-1
21 Aug 2026, 00:3232-1
14 Aug 2026, 17:2633-1
11 Aug 2026, 00:1634no change
6 Aug 2026, 21:1934first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 April 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 December 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

29 Dec 2022, 00:20 UTCviews —

The account of the user that owns this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If it remains inactive in the next 9 days, that account will self-destruct and this channel may no longer have an owner.

19 Dec 2022, 14:46 UTCviews —

The account of the user that owns this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If it remains inactive in the next 18 days, that account will self-destruct and this channel may no longer have an owner.

10 Dec 2022, 04:05 UTCviews —

The account of the user that owns this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If it remains inactive in the next 27 days, that account will self-destruct and this channel may no longer have an owner.

2 May 2022, 03:31 UTC693 viewsread 11 August 2026

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​➡️ 29-dars ​​​Past continuous (question) - O'tgan davomli zamon (so'roq shakli) O'tgan davomli zamonda so'roq gap yasash uchun "was/were" yordamchi fe'li egadan oldinga olib o'tiladi. Formuladagi ko'rinishi: WAS/WERE+EGA+FE’L+ING+BOSHQA SO'ZLAR? Misollar: Was I working? - Men ishlayotgan edimmi? Was He working? - U ishlayotgan edimi? Was She working? - U ishlayotgan edimi? Was it working? -

1 May 2022, 15:15 UTC415 viewsread 11 August 2026
Poll

Put ... book on the table

  1. the51%
  2. a43%
  3. an6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Apr 2022, 15:16 UTC375 viewsread 11 August 2026
Poll

... bag is yours?

  1. What25%
  2. Which60%
  3. Who14%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Apr 2022, 16:34 UTC452 viewsread 11 August 2026
Poll

I have a big problem. You ...me.

  1. help43%
  2. must help50%
  3. must5%
  4. -1%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Apr 2022, 03:22 UTC272 viewsread 11 August 2026

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​➡️ 28-dars ​​​Past continuous (negative) - O'tgan davomli zamon (inkor shakli) O'tgan zamon darak gapda davom etayotgan ish harakatini bildirish uchun was/were fe'llaridan foydalanib, ish-harakatni bildiruvchi so'zga davomiy hozirgi zamon qo'shimchasi "ing" qo'yilishini avvalgi darsda o'tgan edik. O'tgan davomli zamonda inkor gap yasash uchun "was/were"dan so'ng "not" inkor yuklamasi qo'yiladi For

28 Apr 2022, 02:39 UTC234 viewsread 11 August 2026

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​➡️ 27-dars ​​​Past continuous - O'tgan davomli zamon O'tgan zamonda davom etayotgan ish harakatini bildirish uchun was/were fe'llaridan foydalanib, ish-harakatni bildiruvchi so'zga davomiy hozirgi zamon qo'shimchasi "ing" qo'yamiz. ✅ O'tgan davomli zamonda darak gap Formuladagi ko'rinishi: EGA+WAS/WERE+FE’L+ING I, He, She, It olmoshlariga was; We, you, they olmoshlari uchun were ishlatilinadi. Mis

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @english_steptowisdom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 May 2022, 15:15 UTCAnonymous Quiz81 voters

Put ... book on the table

  1. the51%
  2. a43%
  3. an6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Apr 2022, 15:16 UTCAnonymous Quiz83 voters

... bag is yours?

  1. What25%
  2. Which60%
  3. Who14%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Apr 2022, 16:34 UTCAnonymous Quiz115 voters

I have a big problem. You ...me.

  1. help43%
  2. must help50%
  3. must5%
  4. -1%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Apr 2022, 15:56 UTCAnonymous Quiz74 voters

I was tired but I couldn't ... .

  1. see14%
  2. sleep64%
  3. sleeped16%
  4. go7%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Apr 2022, 15:35 UTCAnonymous Quiz66 voters

It was hot in the room, so I ... the window.

  1. died3%
  2. played15%
  3. opened62%
  4. open20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Apr 2022, 15:20 UTCAnonymous Quiz92 voters

We must ... to the bank today. We haven't got any money.

  1. go88%
  2. be4%
  3. buy3%
  4. meet4%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 April 2022 to 29 December 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“English with Step To Wisdom” (@english_steptowisdom), 31 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/english_steptowisdom.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.