Channel
@english_quick_notes
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
832subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001617609909 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @english_quick_notes |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/english_quick_notes |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 832 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:56 | 834 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:47 | 835 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:39 | 835 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (6 July 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 825 |
| Reactions total | 30 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
115 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 34 | 29.6% | |
| ❤ | 28 | 24.3% | |
| 🔥 | 25 | 21.7% | |
| 😁 | 11 | 9.57% | |
| ✍ | 10 | 8.70% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 4.35% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.87% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.87% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 115reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
А что кроме What do you think? Сразу оговорюсь, пост вообще не про «всем срочно надо заменять простые фразы на эдакие». А про то, как одна идея может быть по-разному выражена, в том числе, и не вариантами первого эшелона. Для запроса мнения/обмена мнениями у меня есть два любимчика ☝️What’s your take on that?, где take = мнение, угол зрения. Именно с on What’s your take on freedom of speech? (А ты как смотришь н…
❤7
👆 - Hey. Almost done with a suspect pool. Phone and internet hook-up, electrical, you name it. - How about the cable guy? Hey, not all of us are ready to cut the cord. Now, what do you make of that? - Oh, right, the extended tox panel came in. - Yeah, his drigging his vice but not with a narcotic. Using a gas… carbon monoxide.
❤2
Агенты ФБР ищут преступника, который ловко обращается с кабелями и проводами - отравляет жертв газом через вентиляционную систему. Как агент спрашивают коллегу: «А об этом что скажешь?», когда они начинают расширенную панель анализов обсуждать. Расшифровка и комментарий сегодня после 16:00. #qnotes_challenge
👍2
Walk me through - расскажи мне пошагово «Проведи меня сквозь» процесс Очень люблю это выражение и часто встречаю. ✅ Хорошо и в обыденной речи, например, когда просите объяснения-инструкции: I can’t figure out how to install this app. Could you walk me through it? ✅ и в бизнес-контекстах, например, если даёте структуру презентации или в ходе интервью вас просят пошагово пройтись по резюме, подсветив главные точки…
👍8🔥3
👆 - So, walk us through what’s happening here, Morris. - These are Division A solvers working on their first round of crossword puzzles, which get harder throughout the day. Solvers with the best times advance to the semifinals tomorrow. - And then? - Semifinalist winners make it to the finals next weekend, where the top three players will compete for the title of tournament champion. - I’ll be on the edge of my seat
❤1
Чемпионат по решению кроссвордов. Сама захотела сразу Как ведущий просит главного редактора «рассказать по шагам», что происходит? Расшифровка и комментарий сегодня после 16:00. #qnotes_challenge
👍4❤2😍1
А вот пример проветривания гнева vent my anger and frustration: беру гаечный ключ и хорошенько стучу им зомби по лицу.
🔥8
Поехали по пунктам. Два классных образных выражения. 1) Harbor anger - копить, давать убежище, «укрывать» гнев Harbor - это гавань. Привет, Перл-Харбор. А «гавань» это, потому что есть глагол harbor = укрывать, давать убежище. То есть место, где корабли могут спокойно встать на якорь и не подставляться под все ветра. В переносном значении, например, есть сочетание harbor a fugitive - укрывать, давать убежище беглом…
🔥9
👆 Well, I had to call your father to confirm you weren’t dead. That was fun. Kiana, whether you want to admit it or not, I’m your mother, and I’m trying to turn a new leaf with you. I don’t want to harbor anger. I just want to try. Come to dinner Sunday. Please just give me a call.
👍4
Девушка слушает сообщение от матери, с которой у них плохие отношения с детства. Мама предлагает заново сблизиться, а не «копить гнев». Какую фразу она использует? Сегодня двойной вопрос. В ответе напишите фразу из видео и фразу с противоположным значением - «дать выход гневу» (её в видео нет). Расшифровка и комментарий про обе фразы сегодня после 16:00. #qnotes_challenge
❤7
Sore - больной, болезненный 1️⃣ В прямом значении: After running a marathon, her legs were all sore. Или как существительное, что-то типа «болячка»: When they found him, he was cold, covered in sores and open wounds but alive. Особенно отмечу фразу I have a sore throat (у меня горло болит), часто встречается, в том числе в учебниках. А ещё из интересного: 2️⃣ a sore loser = неудачный из тебя проигравший больно…
✍10❤5👍1
👆 - Do you want to order pizza tonight and play Super Smash Brothers? - You want a rematch? - Hey, the only reason I lost that one time is because I sneezed. - You are such a sore loser. - No… - Jules. - See you tomorrow.
👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @english_quick_notes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Английский: заметки на полях” (@english_quick_notes), 832 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/english_quick_notes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.