Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
9 measurements spanning 60 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 103–123 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Oct 2026, 18:02
105
-3
25 Sept 2026, 00:59
108
-2
11 Sept 2026, 06:01
110
-4
2 Sept 2026, 02:13
114
-2
25 Aug 2026, 02:12
116
-1
16 Aug 2026, 20:46
117
-3
9 Aug 2026, 04:15
120
no change
8 Aug 2026, 14:48
120
-1
7 Aug 2026, 14:56
121
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
27m 21s
Average length
5m 28s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
62 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
37
59.7%
custom 5201918729394351735
8
12.9%
custom 5237930814695564689
5
8.06%
custom 5327782922097274386
4
6.45%
custom 5325972683576334311
3
4.84%
custom 5265244349976832702
2
3.23%
custom 5323711971705505834
1
1.61%
🍓
1
1.61%
🎄
1
1.61%
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚩 Grammatika vaqti
Ⓜ️ Mavzu: Vaqt predloglari
on - on Monday - Dushanbada
in - in February - fevralda
at - at the weekend - hafta oxirida.
Vaqt ko'rsatkichlariga qarab predloglarni farqlaymiz.
1️⃣ on 👉 hafta kunlari nomi bilan keladi 👇
On Monday - dushanbada
On Tuesday - seshanbada
On Wednesday - chorshanbada
On Thursday - payshanbada
On Friday - jumada
On Saturday - shanbada
On Sunday - yakshanbada
2️⃣ In
In th…
Travel and transport
#Topic_vocabulary
🔹Voyage - qayiqda uzoq sayohat
🔹Journey - uzoq masofaga sayohat
🔹Trip - qisqa sayohat
🔹Travel - sayohat
🔹Excursion - qisqa sayohat
🔹View - ko'rinish
🔹Sight - ko'rish qobiliyati
🔹World - dunyo
🔹Earth - yer
🔹Area - hudud (biror bino hududi)
🔹Territory - hudud (davlat hududi)
🔹Season - fasl
🔹Period - muddat
🔹Fare - yo'l haqi
🔹Ticket - bilet, chipta
🔹Fee - to'lov
🔹Miss - o't…
❗️ Ingliz tilida eng ko'p uchraydigan qisqartmalar❕
💢 aren’t = are not
💢 can’t = cannot
💢 could’ve = could have
💢 couldn’t = could not
💢 didn’t = did not
💢 doesn’t = does not
💢 don’t = do not
💢 gonna = going to
💢 gotta = got to, got a
💢 hadn’t = had not
💢 hasn t = has not
💢 haven t = have not
💢 he’d = he had, he would
💢 he’ll = he shall, he will
💢 he’s = he has, he is
💢 how’d = how did, how would
💢 how’ll = how will…
Qóshman OTlar ko'plik manosiga qarab qo'shiladi.
A father in law- qaynota
Fathers in law-qaynotalar
A mather in law-qaynona
Mathers in law- qaynonalar
A school boy-maktabdagi ógil bola
School boys-maktabdagi ógil bolalar
A school girl- mak... Qiz bola
School girls-mak... Qiz bolalar
A man doctor-erkak shifokor
Man doctors- erkak shifokorlar
@pardaev02
Notòģri fe'llarni yodlash uchun qòl keladi deb umid qilamiz (for rap lovers)
Ps. Noto'g'ri fe'llarni yodlashingizga yordam beradi, Albatta, tinglang
@pardaev02
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @english_motiv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 24 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@english_motiv named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@pardaev_02 named in 2 posts, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“English motivation” (@english_motiv), 105 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/english_motiv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.