Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for неангличанин

Channel

неангличанин

@english_ilya

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,609subscribers

-40 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001569637908
TypeChannel
Username@english_ilya
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/english_ilya

Growth

3,6093,6493,6297 August 2026 — 3,649 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,649 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,647 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,642 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,630 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,625 subscribers23 August 2026 — 3,614 subscribers26 August 2026 — 3,611 subscribers29 August 2026 — 3,609 subscribers7 August 202629 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 22 days, net -40. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,603–3,655 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 11:063,609-2
26 Aug 2026, 01:273,611-3
23 Aug 2026, 08:123,614-11
19 Aug 2026, 15:493,625-5
16 Aug 2026, 19:233,630-12
12 Aug 2026, 23:573,642-5
10 Aug 2026, 04:023,647-2
7 Aug 2026, 09:313,649no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:243,649first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.3%
avg views ÷ 3,609 subscribers
Avg views / post
517
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
14.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (23 April 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,034
Reactions total151
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 22:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,259 reactions across 20 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 12.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥28912.8%
1848.15%
👍1838.10%
custom 53345971368204853531677.39%
custom 52357288021427596051617.13%
custom 53909748918874397371195.27%
custom 5877561499311934833954.21%
custom 5386397131059782707944.16%
custom 5350808104332171985934.12%
custom 5371018382181145040903.98%
custom 5965418757613425008893.94%
💯783.45%
custom 5881748989346322262753.32%
custom 5192857499451021759723.19%
custom 5875253663059938765723.19%
custom 5258021679568789405672.97%
custom 5420161831773680729632.79%
custom 5217726154663796197592.61%
custom 5280735858926822987582.57%
custom 5372998546788194447552.43%
5 further kinds964.25%

Custom emoji. 16 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,259reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 April 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @english_ilya. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 April 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC350 views69 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

В английском есть слова, которые почти невозможно встретить отдельно. Когда-то они использовались совершенно свободно, но со временем исчезли, сохранившись лишь внутри устойчивых выражений. Такие слова называют fossil words, или «словесными окаменелостями». Вот некоторые из них: 👥 Kith and kin. Выражение означает «друзья и родственники», то есть весь близкий круг человека. Слово kin, «родня», иногда используется сам

custom 52581218510910437754613🔥9custom 53345971368204853531

4 Aug 2026, 08:07 UTC684 views82 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Оповещение от Дурова меня вчера заставило вспомнить о том, что у меня занимается много олимпийских чемпионов… ну, то есть я часто от студентов школьного возраста слышу что-то в духе I’m going to participate in the Olympics, когда речь идет про академические олимпиады. Так сложилось, что в английском языке академическую олимпиаду так и называют – olympiad. При чем в английском это чаще всего крупные, часто международн

custom 52807358589268229875811👍9🔥4

25 Jul 2026, 20:52 UTC≈1,280 views127 reactionsread 7 August 2026

С школы помним, что названия стран и городов у нас всегда без артикля: London, Georgia, France. Но потом вы внезапно обнаруживаете всякие the Bronx, The Hague и the Netherlands. Почему так? 🌆 The Bronx. Район Нью-Йорка получил название от реки the Bronx River, а та, в свою очередь, была названа в честь Йонаса Бронка, европейского поселенца XVII века. С реками в английском обычно используется артикль: the Thames, the

custom 596541875761342500889💯19👍10custom 53345971368204853539

17 Jul 2026, 17:35 UTC≈1,460 views131 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

В английском некоторые слова выглядят как комплименты, но их настоящее значение зависит от интонации и ситуации. Типа как у нас «смело», «оригинально» или легендарное «ну, главное, что тебе нравится». 😎 Brave – само по себе это действительно «смелый». Но фраза that’s brave нередко означает «я бы на твоём месте так не делал». You’re wearing that to the wedding? That’s brave. 🤔 Interesting – вряд ли имеется в виду чт

custom 587756149931193483395👍18💯13custom 53345971368204853535

9 Jul 2026, 16:00 UTC≈1,550 views86 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🇺🇸 Есть американизмы, которые британцы в последние годы перестали считать чужими. За последние десятилетия американская культура, фильмы, музыка и интернет сделали свое дело. Многие слова, которые раньше считались исключительно американскими, сегодня спокойно используют и в Великобритании. Некоторые до сих пор вызывают недовольство у языковых пуристов, но большинство уже давно стало частью повседневной речи. 🍟 Fries

custom 537299854678819444755💯13custom 533459713682048535312🔥6

2 Jul 2026, 17:55 UTC≈1,480 views104 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Где-то в 2015 году я увлекся ирландской народной музыкой, и примерно тогда же начал учить английский. Одним из первых правил, которое я запомнил, было очень простое: у существительных в английском нет грамматического рода, а все неодушевленные предметы заменяются местоимением it. Поэтому я сильно удивился, когда разбирал одну из самых известных (псевдо)ирландских шанти и услышал строчку way, hey, and up she rises. Ре

custom 58752536630599387657219🔥10custom 53345971368204853533

30 Jun 2026, 23:15 UTC≈1,360 views121 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Название бренда часто превращается в глагол. Вы сто раз слышали всякие «загуглить», «отксерить» и «отфотошопить». В английском такого тоже полно. Вот несколько интересных примеров: 🍔 to DoorDash – заказать доставку еды. Как нетрудно догадаться, произошло от названия сервиса по доставке еды. Причем нередко его используют просто в значении «заказать доставку еды», даже если речь не столько о самом сервисе, сколько о д

custom 538639713105978270794👍138custom 53345971368204853536

29 Jun 2026, 11:32 UTC≈1,470 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

⚡️ ЗАПИСЬ НА ЗАНЯТИЯ Давайте учить английский! 😊Перед началом работы проведем тестирование: на нем мы познакомимся, измерим ваш уровень, поговорим по-английски, обсудим то, как будет проходить наш с вами образовательный процесс. Занимаюсь со взрослыми и подростками от 13 лет. (Если вам нет 18 – нужно будет согласие родителей) Пишите: @ChunkyChad

18🔥6🙏5💯3

28 Jun 2026, 16:20 UTC≈1,390 views77 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В английском есть довольно распространённая фраза till kingdom come, пришедшая из The Lord’s Prayer («Отче наш»). Она почти всегда означает «очень долго», «до скончания веков». Типа I’ll love you till kingdom come. А недавно я встретил ее еще в одном значении: to blow someone (or something) to kingdom come – «разнести в щепки» 😀

🔥39custom 533716400255009769217💯15custom 54001057561355369346

19 Jun 2026, 22:51 UTC≈2,060 views112 reactionsread 7 August 2026

У глагола think есть шутливая альтернативная третья форма глагола. Если хотите звучать саркастично или менее серьезно, можно использовать thunk вместо обычного thought. Who woulda thunk?

👍53custom 519285749945102175938custom 5334597136820485353147

16 Jun 2026, 13:12 UTC≈2,370 views106 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Наверняка в американских фильмах про колледж вы слышали слова fraternity и sorority. Обычно это те самые студенческие «дома» с греческими буквами, странными ритуалами и вечеринками. Fraternity – это мужское студенческое братство, а frat boy – стереотипный член fraternity. Обычно так называют шумного студента, который больше интересуется вечеринками, алкоголем и футболом, чем учeбой. Sorority, соответственно, сестрин

custom 588174898934632226275👍15🔥14custom 53345971368204853532

10 Jun 2026, 22:51 UTC≈2,330 views122 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Меня преследуют всякие интересные выражения с числами! Сейчас вот в The Sopranos прозвучала из уст психолога фраза I’d have to take the fifth, которая означает «я бы предпочла сохранить молчание». Фраза отсылает к пятой поправке Конституции США, которая закрепляет право хранить молчание

custom 542016183177368072963👍35custom 533459713682048535314🔥10

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @english_ilya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 76,241 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“неангличанин” (@english_ilya), 3,609 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/english_ilya.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.