Channel
@english_for_dev
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,894subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 15 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001656132785 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @english_for_dev |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/english_for_dev |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 05:40 | 1,894 | -2 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 13:22 | 1,896 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
145 reactions across 20 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 133 | 91.7% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 6.21% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 2.07% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 145 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 August 2025 to 9 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 August 2025 to 9 October 2025. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
🔄 Few vs A few — велика різниця у маленьких словах #grammarminute 📌 Few — майже немає (негативний відтінок). We have few chances to win. Майже не маємо шансів на перемогу. 📌 A few — кілька, але достатньо (позитивний відтінок). We have a few chances to win! Маємо кілька шансів — не все втрачено! </English> | WannaBlab
❤10
🔝 From basic to advanced #synonyms ✨ заміняймо basic слова на advanced, тож на порядку денному слово: Relax — розслаблятися 😌 📌 relax → unwind → de-stress → … Чекаю твою версію синоніма в цей ланцюжок у коментарях 👇 А вже завтра 09.10 о 19:20 на Speaking Club від WannaBlab ти по-справжньому зможеш unwind і корисно провести час, обговоривши digital detox💫 Запишись за допомогою телеграм бота💜 </English> | WannaBl
❤6
Idioms bring wisdom 🧠 #idiomoftheweek To make waves — привертати увагу, ламати звичний порядок, робити щось помітне. Ex. She really made waves in the company with her fresh ideas. Вона справді наробила шуму в компанії своїми свіжими ідеями. А тепер уяви: ти не просто читаєш такі ідіоми, а використовуєш їх у живій розмові з людьми. Саме так працює наш Speaking Club від WannaBlab: 💬 Тема: Climate Anxiety — Can Indi…
❤7
⚡ Spurn — відкидати, зневажливо відмовлятися #newword She spurned the offer because it didn’t meet the requirements. Вона відкинула цю пропозицію, бо вона не відповідала вимогам. </English> | WannaBlab
❤9
🔥 To move the goalposts — несправедливо змінювати правила чи умови під час процесу #idioms They keep moving the goalposts, so it’s impossible to finish the project. Вони постійно змінюють умови, тож завершити проєкт неможливо. </English> | WannaBlab
❤7
🔄 Each vs Every — у чому різниця? #grammarminute 📌 Each — акцент на кожному елементі окремо. Each teammate shared their update at the meeting. 📌 Every — акцент на групі загалом, повторюваності. Every employee has access to the project dashboard. </English> | WannaBlab
❤7
🔝 From basic to advanced #synonyms ✨ заміняймо basic слова на advanced, тож на порядку денному слово: Use — використовувати 📌 use → employ → utilize → harness → … 🖊️ чекаю твою версію синоніма в цей ланцюжок у коментарях </English> | WannaBlab
❤6
🎯 2 фрази, щоб звучати впевнено на робочому міті #usefulphrases 📌 Could we align on the key priorities before moving forward? — чи можемо узгодити ключові пріоритети перед тим, як рухатися далі 📌 I’d like to clarify a few points to ensure we’re on the same page — хочу уточнити кілька моментів, щоб ми були на одній хвилі Збережи собі ці фрази на майбутнє і став реакцію🚀 </English> | WannaBlab
❤10
⚡ Collaborate — співпрацювати #newword We need to collaborate with the design team on this campaign. Нам потрібно співпрацювати з дизайнерською командою над цією кампанією. </English> | WannaBlab
❤5
🔝 From basic to advanced #synonyms ✨ заміняймо basic слова на advanced, тож на порядку денному слово: Speak — говорити 📌 speak → address → elaborate → expound → … 🖊️ чекаю твою версію синоніма в цей ланцюжок у коментарях </English> | WannaBlab
❤6
🎯 2 фрази, щоб звучати як справжній майстер переговорів #usefulphrases 📌 I am not in a position to acquiesce to these terms — я не можу погодитися з цими умовами 📌 Let us explore a mutually beneficial compromise — давай розглянемо взаємовигідний компроміс Збережи собі ці фрази, щоб вистрілити вчасно 🚀 </English> | WannaBlab
❤9
⚡ Accomplish — досягати, успішно виконувати #newword With teamwork, we can accomplish even the most complex projects. Завдяки командній роботі ми можемо успішно виконати навіть найскладніші проєкти </English> | WannaBlab
❤🔥3❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @english_for_dev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“</English>” (@english_for_dev), 1,894 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/english_for_dev.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.