Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Инженерный фриланс | ПТО | Проектировщики | Сметчики

@engineerfree

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,851subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001868197811
TypeChannel
Username@engineerfree
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/engineerfree

Growth

2,8432,8512,8477 August 2026 — 2,845 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,845 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,843 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,844 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,851 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,842–2,852 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 15:562,851+7
10 Aug 2026, 20:412,844+1
8 Aug 2026, 06:402,843-2
7 Aug 2026, 10:312,845no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:262,845first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 13 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
45m 53s
Average length
15m 18s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

408 reactions across 16 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥25061.3%
7819.1%
👍307.35%
💯184.41%
😱92.21%
👏81.96%
61.47%
👌51.23%
👀10.245%
💋10.245%
🤔10.245%
🤷10.245%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 408reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 January 2026 to 8 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
31
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 19 we hold a reading for · 68%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @engineerfree. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 January 2026 to 8 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Jul 2026, 15:11 UTC≈1,420 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

📚 Коллеги, Вы спрашиваете про обучение ИИ для инженеров и сметчиков, я в очень плотной работе сейчас, но! 1. На днях опубликую сборник ИИ и методы применения каждого конкретного сервиса для задач Инженеров ПТО, Сметчиков и Проектировщиков. В первые дни, конечно, будет скидка. 2. Для обучения по ИИ в фокус-группе (конец июля-начало августа) бронь мест по льготной цене предпродаж осуществляется по предоплате, записа

🔥94

29 Jun 2026, 13:16 UTC≈1,690 views20 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Video

🤡 Автоматический поиск и скачивание сертификатов из интернета Как Вам такое? Я просто закидываю свой список материалов, а они автоматически скачиваются в нужную папку. Конечно, потом ещё они будут автоматически разбросаны в соответствии с разделами проекта, подчищены дубликаты и лишние. Тем не менее, в это время я могу спокойно делать свои дела. И это, кстати, без ИИ. ❗️ P.S. Скачивание из интернета, не из моей

🔥11😱52👀1🤔1

4 Jun 2026, 19:22 UTC≈2,150 views36 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🟢 Урок: Реестр ИД с помощью ИИ (результат на скринах) 1. Открываем и регистрируемся https://aistudio.google.com/prompts/new_chat 2. Выбираем Code and Chat 3. Будет предложено выбрать модель - ничего не выбираем, внизу в строке для промпта загружаем наш файл (сшитая в PDF-альбом ИД) 4. Копируем и вставляем промпт ниже, запускаем Проанализируй приложенный PDF-файл как архив отдельных документов, а не как единый компле

🔥2110👍32

31 May 2026, 11:29 UTC≈2,130 views35 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🧠 Топ-5 ИИ-инструментов для инженеров, ПТО, сметчиков и проектировщиков Большинство специалистов используют ИИ только для написания текстов. Но настоящая ценность для инженера — в работе с проектами, документацией, таблицами и большими массивами данных, плюс, как обсудили на эфире - во внедрении ИИ в процессы. 1. ChatGPT Универсальный инструмент практически для любых инженерных задач. Помогает: — анализировать про

25👌53🔥2

31 May 2026, 11:21 UTC≈1,250 views19 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍9🔥7👏2💋1

31 May 2026, 11:21 UTC≈1,220 viewsread 7 August 2026

Запись части эфира на тему влияния ИИ на отрасль инженерии ❗️ Запись с момента возможностей для увеличения дохода с применением ИИ

31 May 2026, 11:16 UTC≈1,280 views11 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
File

Презентация с эфира на тему влияния ИИ на нашу отрасль, ниже будет запись.

🔥5👏4👍2

30 May 2026, 10:38 UTC≈1,430 views13 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

🎦 Хочу провести бесплатный эфир и пообщаться с Вами на тему того, что вообще грозит инженерам ПТО, сметчикам (в меньшей степени проектировщикам) в отрасли с учетом роста ИИ и как же нам использовать это для роста дохода, а не наоборот 💬 Если актуально и хотите попасть на эфир - пишите + в комментарии. ⏰ Когда? Тянуть не хочу - я бы провела на этих выходных. Для тех, кто не сможет присутствовать, но отписался - буд

🔥13

30 May 2026, 10:32 UTC≈1,200 views14 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

🏛 Помните эволюцию ИИ в инженерке и вообще? Сначала мы просто давали ему роль и базовую инструкцию. Потом в ход пошли трехстраничные промпты, в которых модель всё равно умудрялась теряться и выдавать ошибки, в нашей инженерной сфере так вообще. Казалось, ну вот он, технологический потолок, я и сама ещё года полтора назад говорила, что ИИ мол никак в ПТО не устранит инженеров. (Спойлер: сейчас некоторые строительно-м

🔥11💯3

30 May 2026, 10:26 UTC≈1,040 views12 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

📃 Инструкция как понять, что автоматизировать в Вашей работе По комментариям вижу и тех, кто имеет положительный опыт с ИИ в стройке, и тех, кто уверен, что надо проверять ВСЁ. Вопрос тут в правильном использовании инструментов. Для начала нужно понять, что в Вашей работе можно автоматизировать. 📱 Скопируйте этот промпт в ChatGPT (бесплатная версия подойдёт): Я хочу начать использовать ИИ в работе, но не знаю с че

🔥111

27 May 2026, 12:30 UTC≈1,310 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔔 ИИ для AutoCAD Думали, ИИ - это только про текстовые задачи? Нет, большую часть рутины можно автоматизировать тоже. Многие знакомы с ЛИСПом elen.lsp, который считает сумму длин выбранных объектов на чертеже. А теперь, при правильной настройке архитектуры кода, можно сделать свой собственный ЛИСП, который можно подгрузить в AutoCAD и сэкономить кучу времени, не делая вручную монотонные задачи, фокусируясь только

🔥17👍73👏1

25 May 2026, 17:03 UTC≈1,410 views18 reactions3 Starsread 7 August 2026
Video

🤖 Бот-автосканер сертификатов (см. видео) Подготавливая бот-автоматизатор оформления ИД, мне пришла в голову мысль сделать бот, в который можно было бы: 1. Загрузить PDF сканы сертификатов/паспортов. 2. На выходе получить наименование материала с производителем + номер и срок действия документа. Пока набираю тестировщиков, чтобы улучшить перед выходом, если хотите попробовать бесплатно, пишите: АВТОСКАНЕР в ЛС @am

11👍4🔥2🤷1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @engineerfree. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

14 May 2026, 13:55 UTCAnonymous Poll261 voters

Инженеры-фрилансеры, в каком мессенджере сейчас общаетесь с заказчиками?

  1. Telegram59%
  2. WhatsApp12%
  3. Макс44%
  4. Яндекс.Мессенджер3%
  5. Электронная почта27%

The shares total 145%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

15 Mar 2026, 16:47 UTCAnonymous Poll222 voters

Как у Вас по звонкам/просмотрам с Авито?

  1. Всё как раньше18%
  2. Просмотры как раньше, звонков меньше7%
  3. Просмотров и звонков меньше32%
  4. Раньше звонки были, сейчас нет вообще42%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 January 2026 to 8 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,149,123 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Инженерный фриланс | ПТО | Проектировщики | Сметчики” (@engineerfree), 2,851 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/engineerfree.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.