Channel
@engene_ot_7
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
54subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004431360825 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @engene_ot_7 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/engene_ot_7 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:46 | 54 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:04 | 54 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 30 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (30 June 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 132 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 08:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
19 reactions across 8 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 16 | 84.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 15.8% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
안녕하세요, 저는 ENGENE이며 이 주제에 대해 제가 알고 있는 한 최대한 이야기하고 모든 것을 명확하게 하고 싶습니다. 미나는 ENHYPEN의 멤버 니키의 열렬한 팬 중 한 명이었던 26살의 여자아이였습니다. 미나는 대부분의 팬사인회, 콘서트, 이벤트에 참석했고 멤버들과 많은 인터랙션을 했으며 그것들을 공유했습니다. 그녀는 친절하고 성격이 좋은 아이였고, 단순히 자신의 아이돌을 위해 팬 계정을 운영했으며 자신이 좋아하는 멤버들을 좋아하는 마음으로 응원했습니다. 누구에게도 악플을 달지 않았고 누구를 무시하거나 존중하지 않는 행동도 하지 않았으며, 그녀에게 일어난 일은 절대 그녀가 받아야 할 일이 아니었습니다. 니키 또한 미나를 칭찬했고 그녀를 자신의 열정적인 일본 팬이라고 생각했으며, 두 사람 사이에는 아무런 문제가 없었습니다. 7월 2…
❤🔥1🔥1
Please share this message. Thank you for staying with me. 💞
❤🔥1🔥1
Hi, I am an ENGENE and I want to talk about this topic as much as I know about it and clarify everything. Mina, a 26-year-old girl, was one of the biggest fans of Ni-ki, a member of ENHYPEN. Mina attended most of the fansigns, concerts, and events, had many interactions with the members, and shared them. She was a kind and good-natured girl who only had a fan page for her idols and fangirled over her faves. She neve…
❤🔥1🔥1
Engene are you okay?
برای هایب سخت نبود هیسونگ رو از اون ویدیو کات بزنه، اما اینکار رو نکرد و آپلودش کرد، مقصر خودشه با اینکه میدونست دردسر میشه اما انجامش داد🤷🏻♀️
بیلبورد 100 دفعه مقاله اش رو ادیت کرد، جی از گیتاری که هیسونگ امضا کرده بود استفاده کرد استیکرای سونو 7 کیک بودن شماره لباس سونگهون 7 بود توی اولین کنسرت 6 نفره شون به فنای ot6 احترام نذاشت توی پوستر کنسرت اول به جای هیسونگ جیک رو پاک کرده بودن کلی محتوای آماده ضبط کردن و آخر سر یهویی هیسونگ رو حذف کردن و کریوگرافی دنس ها رو تغییر دادن طوری که اعضا هیچکدوم آمادگی نداشتن و بی خبر بودن هیسونگ چون اسم انجین رو آورد عذرخ…
وقتی یک عضو گروه رو ترک میکنه برای اون مراسم کنسرت خداحافظی برگزار میکنن و یا ایدل شخصا میاد لایو و راجبش حرف میزنه همچنین اعضای گروه میتونن به راحتی حمایتش کنن و باهاش تیک تاک بگیرن و یا حرف بزنن اما اعضای انهایین و یا هیسونگ حتی جرات ندارن اسم همدیگه رو بیارن بنظرتون این طبیعیه؟ این که بعد از این همه مدت بدون هیچ توضیحی جونگوون اومده و راجب انهایین ۶ نفره صحبت کرده واقعا عجیب نیست؟ فکر کردید برای کمپانی چقدر سخته ک…
Isn't it really strange that after all this time, without any explanation, Jungwon suddenly came forward and talked about ENHYPEN as six members? It's not difficult for the company to tell him, "Jungwon, during today's live, say that these are your own thoughts so ENGENEs will lose hope and stop trying." Guys, they will never openly say that they don't consider OT7 ENGENEs to be real fans, even though we are the rea…
I’d rather Jungwon not consider me a true fan than be an OT6 stan
I am so sad:(
In the end, ot7 became the scapegoat for everything
Please come and suggest tweet ideas for everyone to post in support. If you've already shown your support, don't forget to send a screenshot.
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @engene_ot_7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 281,347 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“supporting ot7 Heeseung comeback” (@engene_ot_7), 54 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/engene_ot_7.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.