Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 58 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 182–192 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Oct 2026, 13:19
183
-3
19 Sept 2026, 13:20
186
-1
31 Aug 2026, 14:34
187
-2
24 Aug 2026, 06:16
189
-1
15 Aug 2026, 16:07
190
-1
8 Aug 2026, 12:01
191
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:12
191
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 28 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 17s
Average length
15s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
249 reactions across 13 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5323605228883306051
101
40.6%
custom 5323650386169456014
45
18.1%
custom 5321434054195704549
29
11.6%
custom 5323726437155369411
26
10.4%
custom 5902409877984121665
13
5.22%
custom 5321464900650824235
11
4.42%
custom 5321224434021855008
10
4.02%
custom 5843758070877918101
6
2.41%
custom 5404805279286051803
5
2.01%
custom 5843948307864359451
3
1.20%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 249 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 28 February 2025 to 20 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Как учить новые слова на английском? 🤩
1️⃣понимаем, ЗАЧЕМ мы их учим
Наш вокабуляр делится на active и passive. Первый необходим нам для того, чтобы донести мысль. Их употребление логично и комфортно для нас. Пассивная лексика необходима для понимания аудирования или чтения, эти слова мы узнаем, но сами редко используем. Не нужно растрачивать всю свою мотивацию и энергию на слова, которые встретились единожды в тек…
Явный ред флэг…🤩
С девчонками на занятиях прошли всеми любимую тему отношений:)) Считаю, что за них нужно было брать дополнительную плату еще как за сеанс психотерапии, уж очень надавила на больное. Для вас прикрепляю небольшое задание на спикинг «Red Flag or Not?», высказываем свое мнение.
А самую полюбившуюся лексику оставляю ниже:
✨To date sb / to go out with sb - встречаться с кем-то
✨Match made in heaven - и…
6 поговорок и идиом, которые дословно переводятся с русского на английский! 👍👍👍
Когда такое еще будет? Поэтому учим идиомы срочно, пока они не стали просто непонятным набором слов без какой-либо логики)))))
1️⃣all is well that ends well - хорошо то, что хорошо кончается
It's been one of the most difficult experiences of my life, but all's well that ends well, right?
2️⃣in the wrong place, at the wrong time - не в…
Coulda, woulda, shoulda🌞
— если бы, да кабы
Jared broke up with me out of the blue. I guess I should’ve paid him more attention. Or I could’ve been more compassionate when he had job problems. [Джаред бросил меня ни с того, ни с сего. Видимо, мне надо было быть более внимательной. Или я бы могла больше его пожалеть, когда у него были проблемы с работой.]
Well, coulda shoulda woulda. You can’t go back in time. [Ну,…
Как не выгореть при изучении языка?👩🏽💻
На данный момент я активно занимаюсь изучением нового для себя языка - итальянского + всегда поддерживаю свой уровень английского. И вот какие советы я выделила для себя и делюсь ими с вами.
Романтизируйте процесс
налейте себе любимый напиток, зажгите ароматическую свечу, на фон включите спокойную музыку и приступите к изучению нового материала или его отработки на упражнени…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @engdaryan30. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 28 February 2025 to 20 April 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ИНГЛИШ С DARYAN30🇬🇧” (@engdaryan30), 183 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/engdaryan30.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
