Channel
@energy_loves08092007
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
46subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002174468530 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @energy_loves08092007 |
| Description | Здесь вы можете увидеть обзоры на энергетики, и сводку новых источников😉 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/energy_loves08092007 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:01 | 46 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 46 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 1 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
91 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 27 | 29.7% | |
| 🥰 | 19 | 20.9% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 16.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 8 | 8.79% | |
| 🤮 | 7 | 7.69% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 6.59% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 3.30% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 2.20% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 2.20% | |
| 🤓 | 2 | 2.20% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 91reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 1 April 2025 to 15 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @energy_loves08092007. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 April 2025 to 15 November 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
На обзоре redbull маракуйа🐂🐂🇨🇳 Цена: 88💳 (8юаней) Доступность: Китай🇨🇳 Стиль: довольно скучная рисовка баночки, нету чего то уникального, с виду не отличишь от банальной газировки🤩 Вкус: без газированный энергетик со вкусом маракуйи, не приторный, но вкусный, ведь тут сбалансирован сахар, а также не преобладает кислотность❤️ Итог: 6️⃣➗1️⃣0️⃣ вкусный и редкий энергетик, но вот главный минус, это отсутствие газов,…
🔥5
Ебашу?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Ток прилетел с Китая, мб загружу 3 обзора по зарубежке
❤1👏1
На обзоре у нас IGUANA bubble gum🤩 Цена: 79💳 Доступность: несетевые магазины Стиль: балдежная рисовка в фиолетовом стиле, хотя жвачку принято рисовать в розовом☺️ Вкус: не похоже на привычный вкус жженого сахара, скорее имеет приятную кислинку на послевкусии, очень удивительный и необычный вкус😉 Итог:8️⃣➗1️⃣0️⃣ приятный энергетик и рекомендую попробовать любителям жвачки
❤🔥5🥰3❤1
На обзоре у нас HQD energy golden bears😊 Цена:169💳 Доступность: несетевые магазины Стиль: глянцевая, золотая рисовка банки, минимализм одобряется в энергетиках, также на банке изображены мармеладные мишки, намекая на вкус🕺 Вкус: отдаленно напоминает желейных мишек, вкус имеет приятную приторную сладость, и отсутствует кислинка👍 Итог: 8️⃣➗1️⃣0️⃣ вкусный напиток но не за свою цену😅
❤3💘2🥰1
У Флеша новый вкус!!! Как думаете лучше чем торнадо 🍌 ???
❤3👍2🥰2
На обзоре первый из трех вкусов коктейльной серии Pulse up prosecco energy🥂 Цена:89💳 Доступность: Красное&Белое🛒 Стиль: красочный оттенок золота, похоже на цвет самого вина, имеет матовое покрытые🥂 Вкус: слишком уж чувствуется клубника🍓 в нем, вкус алкоголя вообще не ощущается, приторно сладкий напиток🙂 Итог: 7️⃣➗1️⃣0️⃣ недорогой, прикольный энергетик, советую попробовать любителям сладких газировок✅
❤2🔥2🤮1🥰1
На обзоре у нас Go champ манго-баобаб🥭 Цена: 89💳 Доступность:магнит 🛒 Стиль: однотонная и ничем не выделяющаяся рисовка банки, цвета сыроватые и не выглядят красочными 😩 Вкус: на удивление очень даже вкусный энергетик, манго имела специфический привкус (походу баобаба) и это даже не описать словами, больше походило на слегка приторно-мягкое манго🏖 Итог:9️⃣➗1️⃣0️⃣ очень вкусный и насыщенный энергетик, за свою цен…
❤2👍2🥰2❤🔥1🤮1
На обзоре у нас adrenaline rush limited edition голубая малина лайм-мята▪️▪️ Цена: 119💳 Доступность: Командор Стиль: прикольная рисовка, выделяющая вкус серии adrenaline▪️, имеет также приятное матовое ощущение, когда держишь в руке👍 Вкус: необычное сочетание мохито и малины, очень яркий и насыщенный вкус, доминируют нотки малины, а мохито придает эффект легкого холодка на послевкусии🍇🍹 Итог:8️⃣➗1️⃣0️⃣ как для л…
🥰5❤3❤🔥1🤮1
На обзоре у нас Volt popcorn🍿 Цена: 89💳 Доступность: Пятерочка🛒 Стиль: классная рисовка баночки, напоминающий чашу из под попкорна🍿 Вкус: не сказал бы что это что-то вкусное, есть привкус жженого сахара, и до безумия много сахзама, но все же хоть как то напоминает попкорн😐 Итог: 6️⃣➗1️⃣0️⃣ был конечно удивлен что Volt смогли сделать уникальный вкус энергетика, но вышел он как по мне очень сырой и противный😐
❤4🤮4🔥2
На обзоре HQD energy voltage⚡️ Цена: 169💳 Доступность: несетевые магазины Стиль: очень классная и насыщенная рисовка принта, выглядит безумно потрясающе⚡️ Вкус: потрясающий вкус голубики, очень люблю ягодные энергосы и этот вкус меня не подвел, очень насыщенный и красочный напиток🫐 Итог: 1️⃣0️⃣➗1️⃣0️⃣ настоятельно рекомендую на пробу любителям ягодный необычных вкусов
🔥4
Ожидаем обзор) «вольт попкорн»
🥰3❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @energy_loves08092007. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Ебашу?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Возвращаем?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 1 April 2025 to 15 November 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Energy_Loves🫶🏻” (@energy_loves08092007), 46 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/energy_loves08092007.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.