Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Непомнящая | Язык и ветер

@enepomn

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

866subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001661302448
TypeChannel
Username@enepomn
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/enepomn

Growth

861866863.56 August 2026 — 861 subscribers6 August 2026 — 861 subscribers12 August 2026 — 866 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 860–867 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 22:43866+5
6 Aug 2026, 14:36861no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:02861first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 31 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.3%
avg views ÷ 866 subscribers
Avg views / post
142
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.77%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held20 (31 May 202630 July 2026)
Views total849
Reactions total66
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 14:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

336 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11634.5%
🔥8224.4%
😁5817.3%
❤‍🔥3711.0%
👍278.04%
💯92.68%
🆒30.893%
🎉20.595%
👌10.298%
🤗10.298%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 336reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 May 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
119
across the posts below
Posts paid on
17
of 20 we hold a reading for · 85%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @enepomn. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 May 2026 to 30 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 09:11 UTC88 views7 reactions7 Starsread 6 August 2026

Так почему открытости недостаточно? В прошлом посте я оставила вопрос: почему открытость новому не помогает легче проходить через лиминальность? Вроде бы должна – но ожидаемой связи исследователи не обнаружили. Вот как я это вижу. Само слово «лиминальность» – от латинского limen, «порог». И мне кажется, часть разгадки прячется в этом слове. Открытость помогает выйти из знакомого и ступить на порог. Распахнуть две

3👍2🔥2

26 Jul 2026, 13:18 UTC132 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

Вот шкала и опросник в pdf #лиминальнаякомпетентность Непомнящая | Язык и ветер

🔥3

26 Jul 2026, 13:18 UTC132 views7 reactions7 Starsread 6 August 2026

Шкала субъективной лиминальности Как вы думаете: открытость новому помогает человеку проходить через лиминальность – или нет? Казалось бы, ответ очевиден. Кто любит новое, тянется к идеям и возможностям, тот и переходы должен проживать легче. Логично же. Оказалось – не совсем. В 2023 году Удаян Дхар и Ричард Бояцис создали шкалу, которая измеряет субъективную лиминальность, то самое ощущение состояния «между», ко

4🔥2👍1

24 Jul 2026, 15:57 UTC136 views16 reactions7 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Хоть я и не пью уже без одной недели 6 лет (вообще офигеть цифра-то)) Но всё равно смешно!🤣

😁11🔥41

22 Jul 2026, 11:31 UTC179 views15 reactions7 Starsread 6 August 2026

Несколько человек спросили меня: Катя, ты смотришь футбол? А я понимаю, что нет. Не смотрю. И даже не хочу начинать. Сидела, думала: почему же так? Ведь было время, когда я очень, очень, очень – даже не могу подобрать слово – сильно любила футбол. Ну вот, например, помню: студенческие годы, мой день рождения, и у нас дома сломался телевизор. А в этот день ответственный матч, то ли чемпионат мира, то ли Европы, уже

❤‍🔥10🔥3👌1🤗1

20 Jul 2026, 13:20 UTC182 views18 reactions7 Starsread 6 August 2026

У меня так бывает: читаю про какого-то человека – и возникает чувство, похожее на влюблённость. Ну ладно, может, не влюблённость – но точно ясно: вот с этим человеком я хотела бы познакомиться и поговорить. Обидно немного, что большая часть этих людей уже где-то не здесь, и список таких людей у меня, кстати, довольно длинный (хорошо, что и среди живых такие люди тоже есть)) Недавнее такое знакомство – математик Джон

8🔥5🆒3❤‍🔥2

14 Jul 2026, 15:11 UTC196 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Poll

Про что для вас канал Непомнящая | Язык и ветер? (можно выбрать несколько вариантов)

  1. Про лиминальность – как жить в неопределённости переходов, не ставя жизнь на паузу46%
  2. Про то, как понимать и принимать себя, про авторство39%
  3. Про лидерство и команды7%
  4. А мне вот про цигун интересно21%
  5. Про развороты смыслов: думаешь одно – уходишь с другим61%
  6. Да про что я подумаю – про то Катя и пишет) Колдунство какое–то25%
  7. Про что–то моё. И вообще, не задавай такие странные вопросы, Катя!39%
  8. Не знаю, про что – я его не читаю. Где я? Кто здесь?7%
  9. Напишу свой вариант в комментариях4%

The shares total 249%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🔥63👍1

14 Jul 2026, 15:11 UTC172 views9 reactions7 Starsread 6 August 2026

Сегодня с удивлением обнаружила: ровно два года, как я в челлендже Content Hero. Помню, как удивлялась, что дошла до 100 дней, а тут – два года, и это уже стало практически образом жизни. Правда из нашей группы осталось всего четверо. Мы периодически грозимся выйти из челленджа – но всё не выходим. Пишем каждый день (ну или штрафы платим, если пропустили🙃). Что-то из написанного публикую здесь, а что-то нет. И во

6🎉2🔥1

10 Jul 2026, 08:04 UTC191 views6 reactions7 Starsread 6 August 2026

Сегодня в рубрике "Пятничные воспоминания" пост почти двухлетней давности - про время Про время через время) Любопытно встретить себя, какой я была два года назад, и увидеть, как это разворачивается Непомнящая | Язык и ветер

4👍1🔥1

9 Jul 2026, 11:54 UTC205 views20 reactions7 Starsread 6 August 2026

Тут у любимой Сабины Кулиевой подрезала идею - придумывать продолжения к пословицам и поговоркам. Обожаю такое! Перевернуть всё) Мои пока два навскидку: 1. Человек - человеку, и нечеловек - человеку. 2. Язык мой. Мой ли? У Сабины очень понравилось: Бесплатный сыр только для второй мыши)) и вот это: Снимаю. Порчу. Пишите свои варианты! 🎊 Непомнящая | Язык и ветер

😁114👍3🔥2

7 Jul 2026, 10:25 UTC228 views25 reactions7 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Я пишу этот текст на ноутбуке, рядом стоит кружка кофе, который я только что сварила в турке на электрической плите. Смартфон присылает уведомления о новых сообщениях. На кухне работает холодильник, стиральная машина пытается устранить последствия кошкиного хулиганства) Обычный день: техника делает свою работу, а я – свою. Мы живём в мире, где без технологий уже невозможно представить ни быт, ни медицину, ни связь,

12💯9❤‍🔥4

29 Jun 2026, 11:04 UTC234 views26 reactions7 Starsread 6 August 2026

Когда всё колеблется одновременно Когда несколько систем разного масштаба начинают колебаться одновременно и передают колебание друг другу, амплитуда общего колебания нарастает непропорционально – и не остаётся ни одной достаточно неподвижной точки, чтобы её погасить. То, что казалось терпимым колебанием, вдруг становится неуправляемым – не из-за того, что добавилось что-то новое, а потому что волны усилили друг др

🔥1110👍5

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @enepomn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

14 Jul 2026, 15:11 UTCAnonymous Poll28 voters

Про что для вас канал Непомнящая | Язык и ветер? (можно выбрать несколько вариантов)

  1. Про лиминальность – как жить в неопределённости переходов, не ставя жизнь на паузу46%
  2. Про то, как понимать и принимать себя, про авторство39%
  3. Про лидерство и команды7%
  4. А мне вот про цигун интересно21%
  5. Про развороты смыслов: думаешь одно – уходишь с другим61%
  6. Да про что я подумаю – про то Катя и пишет) Колдунство какое–то25%
  7. Про что–то моё. И вообще, не задавай такие странные вопросы, Катя!39%
  8. Не знаю, про что – я его не читаю. Где я? Кто здесь?7%
  9. Напишу свой вариант в комментариях4%

The shares total 249%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 May 2026 to 30 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 323,539 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Непомнящая | Язык и ветер” (@enepomn), 866 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/enepomn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.