Channel
@endotalim
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
15,498subscribers
-50 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001940264547 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @endotalim |
| Description | Kanal xalqni endokrinologiya, nutritsiologiya va dietologiya sohalaridagi eng so'ngi va ishonchli ma'lumotlar bilan ta'minlash maqsadida tashkil etilgan Endokrinolog Husan Ilxomovich Qabulga yozilish @endo_assistent Chat: https://t.me/+GgMANa-BFFswMzcy |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/endotalim |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 15,498 | -51 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:08 | 15,549 | -7 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 15,556 | +11 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 10:03 | 15,545 | +21 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:18 | 15,524 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:58 | 15,525 | -10 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 11:37 | 15,535 | -51 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:37 | 15,586 | -23 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:52 | 15,609 | +9 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:15 | 15,600 | +4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:11 | 15,596 | +6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:06 | 15,590 | +37 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:14 | 15,553 | +5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 15,548 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
2,941 reactions across 20 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2,251 | 76.5% | |
| 👏 | 509 | 17.3% | |
| 🏆 | 181 | 6.15% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,941reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 August 2025 to 14 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @endotalim. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 August 2025 to 14 December 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Muhum mavzular: Diabetni to'liq davolash mumkinmi? Tanangizda qancha ortiqcha yog' borligini hisoblash Gipotireoz bepushtlikka sabab bo'ladimi? Vitamin D ni qanday dozada ichish kerak? Gormonlarni semizlikka tasiri bormi? Anemiyasiz yashirin temir tanqisligi Ayollarda bepushtlikning eng keng tarqalgan sababi Tugunli buqoqni doim ham operatsiya qilish shartmi? Autoimmun tireoidit - real bemor misolida Insuli…
👍229👏27🏆24
Yangi "elektron retsept" tizimi yohud tibbiyotimizdagi inqilobiy o'zgarishlar (by ET) Siyosatga aralashishni yoqtirmasamda doktor sifatida tibbiyot sohasidagi oxirgi bo'layotgan voqealarga munosabat bildirish va xalqimizga to'g'ri tushuncha berishni burchim deb topdim Xabaringiz bor 12-dekabrdan boshlab Dmed elektron retsept tizimi ishga tushurildi. Bunga ko'ra shifokorlar endilikda dori vositalarini elektron retse…
👍97🏆10👏7
Maqola o'chirib yuborilmasidan oldin uni saqlab qo'ying!
👍55👏12🏆2
Endokrinolog qanday kasalliklarni davolaydi? (ET) Ko'pchilik (xatto ayrim doktorlar ham) endokrinolog deganda faqat diabet, buqoq yoki semizlik bilan shug'ullanadigan doktorlarni tushunishadi, aslida esa endokrinologiya juda katta va deyarli barcha organ sistemasiga tasir ko'rsatuvchi murakkab soha hisoblanadi. Bugun sizlarga endokrinolog kim va qanday kasalliklarni davolashi haqida tushuncha bermoqchiman Endokrino…
👍79🏆7👏1
Maqola o'chirib yuborilmasidan oldin uni saqlab qo'ying!
👍125🏆23👏19
Ideal tana vaznini hisoblash uchun ideal formula (by Xusan Ilxomovich) Bugun sizlarga ideal tana vaznini hisoblash uchun eng mashxur va ishonchli bo'lgan Devayn formulasini o'rgatmoqchiman. Ideal tana vazni (ITV) - malum bir balandlik, yosh va jins uchun o'lim xavfi eng past bo'lgan tana vaznidir Devayn formulasi: (ET) Erkaklar uchun: ITV = 50 + 0.9 * (bo'y (sm) - 152) Ayollar uchun: ITV = 45.5 + 0.9 * (bo'y (sm) …
👏222👍111🏆14
Demak eng ko'p ovozni ideal tana vazni to'pladi, kommentda + qoldirganlar soni 100 tadan oshsa maqolamni kanalga joylashtiraman!
👍130👏16
Keyingi yoziladigan maqola qaysi mavzuda bo'lishini xohlaysiz?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍27🏆5👏2
Maqola o'chirib yuborilmasidan oldin uni saqlab qo'ying!
👍121🏆8
Sog'likdagi muammolarning siz ahamiyat bermaydigan eng keng tarqalgan sababi (by Xusan Ilxomovich) Statistika malumotlariga qaraganda dunyo aholisining taxminan 25% qismida anemiya yani kamqonlik kasalligi mavjud bo'lib, temir mikroelementi yetishmovchiligi anemiyaga sabab bo'luvchi barcha holatlarning 50% qismini tashkil etadi. Ha tushunganingizdek bugun sizlar bilan eng ko‘p uchraydigan, ammo ko‘pincha e’tibordan…
👍313👏22🏆19
Kanalni yo'qotib qo'ymaslik uchun hoziroq a'zo bo'lib qo'ying!
👍199🏆17👏17
https://telegra.ph/XIMIKLAR-TUPOY-KACHOKlik-sirlari-yohud-ANABOLIK-STEROIDLAR-va-ularning-asoratlari-09-13
👍133👏21🏆12
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @endotalim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Keyingi yoziladigan maqola qaysi mavzuda bo'lishini xohlaysiz?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Kanalda fitness bilan shug'ullanuvchi yoshlar soni ortib borayotgani uchun shu sohaga oid bir dolzarb mavzuda maqola yozmoqchiman, sizga qiziqmi?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 August 2025 to 14 December 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 381,918 of 1,581,209entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Эндокринолог Хусан Илхомович” (@endotalim), 15,498 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/endotalim.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.