Channel
@endokrinolog_uzb
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
161subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001890879240 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @endokrinolog_uzb |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/endokrinolog_uzb |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:05 | 161 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:30 | 159 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 159 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (29 January 2025 – 25 July 2026) |
| Views total | 101 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
11 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 5 | 45.5% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 27.3% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 18.2% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 9.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 January 2025 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Endokrinologimiz 1-TOIFA imtixonlaridan loyihamizdagi malumotlardan foydalangan holda oson o'tib olibdilar tabriklaymiz 👏👍 Loyihani jamiyatga foydasi tegayotganidan xursandman, buni shuncha yillik mehnat samarasi deb hisoblayman... Loyihada qatnashishni xohlasangiz @dj_secret ga murojaat qilishingiz mumkin
👍2🔥2
Endocrine discussions loyihamdagi ikkinchi DOKTORANT, tabriklaymiz 👏👍 DJ armiyasidan 2 kishi doktoranturaga topshirdi va ikkalasi ham qabul qilindi, 100% lik natija :) https://t.me/toshkent_tibbiyot
👏2
Qanday tezlikda harakatlanish muhim emas - muhimi harakatdan to'xtamaslik! Bu gapni o‘zimga ham, shogirdlarimga ham doimo eslatib kelaman. Bugun diskussiya guruhimdagi eng iqtidorli shogirdlarimdan biri doktoranturaga kirgani haqida xabar yozibdi. Bu xabar man uchun shunchaki yangilik emas, 5 yillik loyiham samara berishni boshlaganini ko'rsatadi Soham rivojlanishi, iqtidorli kadrlar yetishib chiqishi va bilimga ch…
🔥3
ENDOCRINOLOGISTS loyihasida qatnashgan endokrinolog hamkasbimiz beriladigan malumotlardan foydalanib 2-kategoriya olganlarini yozibdilar, foydali bo'layotganidan judayam xursand bo'ldim Loyihada qatnashishni xohlasangiz @dj_secret ga murojaat qilishingiz mumkin
Assalomu alaykum. 1. Hali foydalanmadim. Lekin niyat bor. 2. Hali vrach emasman ) Kelajakda albatta foydalanaman. 3. Kitoblarni òqish orqali òrganib bòlmaydigan narsalar bòladi. Shuningdek, distiplina bor guruhda. Va guruhda shifokorlar, endokrinologlar yiģilgan. Hammaligi man uchun ustoz. Haftada 1 bòlganiga tayyorlanishga ulguryapman. 4. Ha, arziydi, albatta 💯💯💯 5. Case lar, ma'lumotlar bazasi deyishibdi yuqorida, …
Assalomu alaykum. 1. Mundarija mavzularni tartibli va doimiy o'qib chiqqanim yo'q , bazaviy bilimlarda muammolarim bor shularni to'ldirib, mavzularni jiddiy o'rganishga kirishaman. 2. Talabaman, amaliyotda qo'llab ko'rolganim yo'q , lekin boshqa fan va yo'nalishlarda ham asqotmoqda. 3. nafaqat pulga , balkim sarflangan vaqtga ham , albatta, arziydi. 4. Mavzuga oida ma'lumotlar , diskusdan oldin ham ulashib borils…
Assalomu alaykum 1.Hozircha mundarijadagi mavzularni ko’rib chiqishga ulgurmadim. Faqat sanoqli mavzularni o’qib chiqqanman. 2.Talaba bo’lganligim sababli olayotgan bilimlarimni amaliyotda qo’llab ko’rolmayapman hozircha. Lekin tezroq nazariy bilimlarni amaliyotda qanday qo’llanishini ko’rgim kelyapti. Guruhdagi endokrinolog shifokorlarga juda ham xavasim keladi. O’z bilimlaridan bemalol amaliyotda foydalanish, ma’l…
Man Mundarija orqali foydalnib turaman. Takrorlash uchun . Bemorlarim yoq hali endi hudo hohlasa foydalanaman ( ishga kirdim yaqinda) Qatnashsam maza qilaman yangiliklardan qolib ketmaslikka harakat qilaman. Judayam bebaho malumotlar. Savol jabob mavzulari royhati va vaqtini oyni boshidan tashab qoyilsa mustahkamroq tayyorlanishga koproq vaqt bolardi deb oylayman
1.Men mundarija orqali oʻqib konspek qilib chiqayapman. 2.Hozircha bemorlarim yoʻq. Magistr 2 kursman (Albatta ishga kirish imkoniyatim bor. Lekin qoʻrqyapman. Eplolmasamchi deb.) 3. Dangasalik, bilim darajam yetarli emasligi. Mavzuni oʻqishda aniq, bitta adabiyot topolmayotganim. 4. Ming bor roziman. 5.Zoom, telegramdagi jonli darslar. -Aniq bemorga retsep yozish. -mavzuni oʻqiyotgan manbaalaringizni boʻlishis…
❤1
Assalamu alaykum. Avvalo shu loyihani tashkil etganingiz uchun katta rahmat, Alloh rozi bo'lsin. 1. Mundarija orqali ketma-ket emas, o'zim qiziqqan ko'p mavzularni qayta-qayta o'qib chiqqanman, lekin baribir, o'zim tayyorlanib, diskussiyada qatnashish orqali olgan bilimlarim ko'proq esimda qolgan. 2. Hali ishlab ko'rganim yo'q (ishlashdan ozgina qo'rquv ham bor). Ishlay boshlaganimda bu bilimlar qo'l keladi deb o'yla…
Assalomu alaykum 1.Mundarija juda qulay.esimizdan chiqgan narsa bolsa izlab qayta takrollash juda qol keladi. 2.Amaliyot va ilmiy ishlarda ham qol kevotti. 3.puli arzidi.guruh savol javobda qatnashsam juda zor lekin doim ham vaqt topa olmayman lekin albatta oqib chiqaman. 4.real bemorlarda analizlar bilan korsak juda yaxshi bolarfi.Keyin foydalangan adabiyotlarni kitoblarni kutib qolaman.
Assalomu aleykum Men mundarija asosida oqimayman. Discussiyalarga qatnasha olmayman lekin o'qib daftarimga yozib boraman amalliyotdaxam juda as qotadi bergan bilimlariz. To'layotgan pulimga va ketgan vaqtimda mingdan ming roziman.Berayotgan oltindan qimmat bilimlarizga rozi boling
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @endokrinolog_uzb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,120,354 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Отзывы | Endocrine discussions” (@endokrinolog_uzb), 161 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/endokrinolog_uzb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.