Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Эндокринология Больница 52

Channel

Эндокринология Больница 52

@endocrinologyGKB52

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,155subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002171568858
TypeChannel
Username@endocrinologyGKB52
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/endocrinologyGKB52

Growth

3,1553,1563,155.57 August 2026 — 3,156 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,156 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,155 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,155–3,156 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 03:513,155-1
7 Aug 2026, 10:513,156no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:183,156first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 21 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.0%
avg views ÷ 3,155 subscribers
Avg views / post
632
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held11 (21 June 20263 August 2026)
Views total2,527
Reactions total84
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
21m 02s
Average length
21m 02s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

324 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12438.3%
👍9128.1%
🔥6720.7%
❤‍🔥237.10%
👏92.78%
🥰51.54%
🙏41.23%
😍10.309%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 324reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 14:54 UTC340 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @gkb52linkVideo

Как уместить все вопросы о гормонах в один прямой эфир? На телеканале «Москва24» попытались: назвали рубрику "Миллион Вопросов" и не прогадали. Тем более, что сегодня гостем программы была профессор Татьяна Николаевна Маркова, заведующая эндокринологическим отделением МКНИЦ Больница 52 — крутая возможность для зрителей разобраться, что делать, когда гормоны разбушевались. 🔸Сколько раз в год (а , может быть, за в

🔥11🥰2👏1

29 Jul 2026, 06:33 UTC682 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Уважаемые пациенты и посетители! С 24 июля отделение эндокринологии МКНИЦ Больницы 52 открыло свои двери в филиале на Новой Риге. Адрес: МО. Городской округ Красногорск Пос. Истра д. 27 Отделение эндокринологии находится в корпусе номер 3 (бывший радиологический корпус), 2 этаж, с лестницы - направо. Как пройти на госпитализацию? После КПП нужно пройти прямо до 1 корпуса (главный корпус с колоннами), обратится в

16🔥9

27 Jul 2026, 16:15 UTC709 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📰 Новости медицины: Американские коллеги (AHA, ACC, ADA, ASN) представили новый клинический протокол, который кардинально меняет подход к пациентам с метаболическими нарушениями. Ниже вы можете ознакомиться с основными тезисами: 1. Новый диагноз: Синдром CKM (Сердечно-Почечно-Метаболический) Теперь ожирение, диабет, болезни почек и сердца — это не отдельные заболевания, а звенья одной цепи. Введено стадирование от

👍173🔥3

22 Jul 2026, 13:03 UTC796 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#Новости_эндокринологии ❗️ Новое руководство по сердечно-почечно-метаболическому синдрому (CKM) — 2026 Впервые в истории сразу несколько ведущих медицинских ассоциаций (AHA, ACC, ADA, ASN) выпустили единый документ, посвящённый сердечно-почечно-метаболическому синдрому. ✔️ Это состояние, при котором метаболические нарушения (ожирение, сахарный диабет 2 типа), хроническая болезнь почек и сердечно-сосудистые заболева

🔥13👍6👏3

13 Jul 2026, 12:44 UTC≈2,890 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Международный консенсус 2026: применение агонистов ГПП-1 и ГПП-1/ГИП при сахарном диабете 1 типа ✅Опубликован международный консенсус (ATTD, AACE, ISPAD, ADCES, IDF Europe, Breakthrough T1D), посвященный безопасному применению агонистов рецептора ГПП-1 и двойных агонистов ГПП-1/ГИП (семаглутид, тирзепатид) у пациентов с сахарным диабетом 1 типа. ❗️Важно: документ не расширяет зарегистрированные показания, а предлаг

👍188🔥5👏1

11 Jul 2026, 11:20 UTC874 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

С-клеточная гиперплазия и медуллярный рак щитовидной железы: проблемы дифференциальной диагностики Несмотря на значительный прогресс в лабораторной диагностике, молекулярной генетике и патоморфологии, дифференциальная диагностика С-клеточной гиперплазии и медуллярного рака щитовидной железы (МРЩЖ) остается одной из наиболее сложных задач современной эндокринологии и тиреоидной патологии. 📊До настоящего времени не с

17👍9👏3❤‍🔥1

8 Jul 2026, 14:09 UTC917 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Коллеги, делимся с вами новостями Европейского конгресса по ожирению ECO 2026, который проходит с 12 по 15 мая в Стамбуле! Зенагамитид: первый унимолекулярный агонист GLP-1 и амилина Зенагамитид (бывший amycretin, Novo Nordisk) — первая молекула, одновременно активирующая рецепторы GLP-1 и амилина (AMYR). В отличие от комбинации кагрилинтид+семаглутид (КагриСема), здесь одна молекула обеспечивает фиксированное соот

19👍11🔥3

4 Jul 2026, 11:45 UTC≈1,010 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#советы_для_пациентов Дорогие читатели! Сегодня продолжаем цикл о физической активности на фоне терапии арГПП-1, опираясь на клинический консенсус Европейской ассоциации по изучению ожирения (EASO). Напомним коротко о предыдущих фазах: ✅Фаза 0 (метаболическое программирование) — 6–8 недель. Необходима для плавного входа в режим тренировок, формирования двигательной привычки и адаптации кардиореспираторной системы

11🙏4👍2🔥2❤‍🔥1

27 Jun 2026, 10:14 UTC≈1,030 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Научная работа отделения и кафедры — на ведущей мировой площадке ATTD 2026 Рады представить результаты исследования, выполненного на базе эндокринологического отделения МКНИЦ Больницы № 52 и опубликованного в авторитетном журнале Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics (Q1), в рамках конгресса ATTD (Барселона, 11–14 марта 2026). 👥 Авторы: научный руководитель — д.м.н., проф. Маркова Татьяна Николаевна, аспирант Овчинник

👍226🔥6👏1😍1

25 Jun 2026, 19:06 UTC982 views52 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Дорогие коллеги! Сегодня мы провожаем очередной выпуск наших ординаторов в профессиональную жизнь! 🎓👏 "От лица всего коллектива ординаторов хотим сказать спасибо кафедре эндокринологии Российского университета медицины за качественную подготовку кадров и лично Татьяне Николаевне Марковой - за мудрое наставничество, терпение и умение зажечь в учениках любовь к профессии. Также выражаем искреннюю благодарность всему к

❤‍🔥2118🔥13

21 Jun 2026, 10:25 UTC≈1,340 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

20 июня в г. Ташкент (Узбекистан) прошел Международный научно-практический форум «Трансформация подходов к управлению метаболическим здоровьем: от мудрости Авиценны к технологиям современности» На форме выступили ведущие специалисты здравоохранения Узбекистана, Казахстана, Грузии и России. С докладом "Метаболический компас: курс на персонализацию и безопасность терапии" выступила заведующая отделением эндокринологии

26👍6🥰3🔥2

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @endocrinologyGKB52. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 728,052 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Эндокринология Больница 52” (@endocrinologyGKB52), 3,155 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/endocrinologyGKB52.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.