8 measurements spanning 23 days, net +18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,891–3,915 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Aug 2026, 12:44
3,912
+2
27 Aug 2026, 08:34
3,910
+6
24 Aug 2026, 01:58
3,904
+3
17 Aug 2026, 20:47
3,901
-2
14 Aug 2026, 17:35
3,903
+1
11 Aug 2026, 18:41
3,902
+2
8 Aug 2026, 09:14
3,900
+6
7 Aug 2026, 18:17
3,894
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.2%
avg views ÷ 3,912 subscribers
Avg views / post
634
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.37%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 14 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
14 (25 June 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
1,268
Reactions total
30
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 05:58 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
523 reactions across 14 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
257
49.1%
👍
140
26.8%
🔥
87
16.6%
👏
23
4.40%
❤🔥
10
1.91%
💘
2
0.382%
✍
1
0.191%
👌
1
0.191%
🙏
1
0.191%
🤔
1
0.191%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 523reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 14 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @endoclub360. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
⚡️Нефропротекция при СД 1 типа
Исследование FINE-ONE впервые показало эффективность и безопасность применения финеренона у пациентов с СД 1 типа и хронической болезнью почек.
Дизайн
📍242 пациента с СД1, СКФ 25–90 мл/мин/1.73 м² и альбуминурией (отношение альбумин/креатинин (А/Кр) мочи 200–5000 мг/г), на стабильной дозе иРААС.
🎯Первичная конечная точка: относительное изменение отношения А/Кр мочи через 6 месяцев.
…
🧾 SURPASS‑CVOT: тирзепатид vs дулаглутид — влияние на почки у пациентов с СД2 и сердечно-сосудистыми заболеваниями 🩺📊
• Рандомизированное двойное слепое активноконтролируемое исследование SURPASS‑CVOT показало: при медианном наблюдении 4,0 года риск первичного почечного исхода был на 23%❗ ниже при приёме тирзепатида по сравнению с дулаглутидом. ⚖️
📌Дизайн и популяция
• Пациенты: сахарный диабет 2 типа + атеросклеро…
🔬💊Схемы лечения дефицита и недостаточности витамина D.
📌Спасибо всем, кто оставляет реакции под постами и делится с коллегами!🫶🧑⚕️
🌸Клуб Эндокринологов✨
📌Наши социальные сети: Telegram| MAX | VK
🧬 Lantidra — FDA одобрила первую аллогенную клеточную терапию при СД1: кратко для клинициста 🩺
• Lantidra = донорные островковые клетки (аллогенные), вводят в воротную вену печени однократно, иммуносупрессия обязательна.
📌Клинические данные:
• В двух нерандомизированных исследованиях: 21 пациент не нуждался в инсулине в течение 1 года; у 10 пациентов эффект сохранялся >5 лет📈
🧬Еще одна перспективная технология, к …
Кофеин и сердечно‑сосудистые заболевания — кратко для практики (по заявлению Aмериканской кардиологической ассоциации, 2026) ☕️🫀
📌Коротко — главное
• Умеренное потребление кофеина (до 400 мг/сутки, ≈ 3–5 чашек кофе) безопасно для большинства здоровых взрослых и связано с равным или даже сниженным риском ССЗ.
• Индивидуальная реакция варьирует (генетика, возраст, сопутствующие заболевания).
• Энергетики и высокие доз…
❓Нужно ли отменять аГПП‑1 перед эндоскопией — или достаточно жидкой диеты?
🩺 Вопрос остаётся дискуссионным: агонисты рецепторов ГПП‑1 замедляют опорожнение желудка и могут повышать вероятность наличия остаточного содержимого при эндоскопии, что увеличивает риск осложнений при седации.
📊 Новые данные указывают, что ключевой фактор — не столько сам приём аГПП‑1, сколько подготовка пациента. Пациенты, продолжавшие тер…
📌Пероральный семаглутид не показал замедления клинического прогрессирования болезни Альцгеймера 🧠💊.
📌Двухлетний (104‑недельный) анализ глобальных исследований EVOKE и EVOKE Plus не показал, что за два года терапии Ребелсас не продемонстрировал преимуществ перед плацебо: темпы ухудшения по клиническим шкалам деменции оказались сопоставимыми. Наблюдавшиеся у части пациентов небольшие изменения в биомаркерах – снижение…
🩺 Новые данные о влиянии антидиабетических препаратов на риски печёночных осложнений! 🧬
В свежем сетевом метаанализе оценили, как разные классы препаратов для лечения СД2 влияют на серьёзные исходы со стороны печени. В анализ вошли 46 наблюдательных исследований и более 7 млн пациентов с СД2 (средний возраст — 55,7 лет). 🧐
📊 Ключевые результаты по классам препаратов:
1. Тиазолидиндионы — лидеры по снижению риска г…
🔔 FDA одобрило новый препарат для лечения эндокринной офтальмопатии — велигротуг (VRDN‑001)
📌 В июне 2026 г. FDA одобрило велигротуг (ранее VRDN‑001) для терапии эндокринной офтальмопатии. До сих пор единственным одобренным препаратом в этой нозологии оставался тепротумумаб.
📌 Детали терапии:
• Протокол велигротуга: 5 инфузий каждые 3 недели, продолжительность инфузии ~30 минут.
• Протокол тепротумумаба для сравнен…
🔬 арГПП‑1 и риск ожирению‑ассоциированных опухолей (OAC)
📌В федеративной базе TriNetX выделили 229 467 взрослых с ожирением без СД и предшествующих OAC. Период наблюдения 2 года.
📌Пациентов разделили на когорты: группа арГПП‑1 и только диетические/физические рекомендации.
📌После сопоставления 1:1 — по 80 899 в каждой группе; средний возраст 47 лет, 72% — женщины.
📌Ключевые результаты 📊
• Применение арГПП‑1 ассоци…
👩⚕️ Женщина, 72 года, поступила с декомпенсацией СД2: жалобы на головные боли, боли в крупных суставах и мышцах, ухудшение зрения, неконтролируемую АГ, эпизоды гипергликемии до 21 ммоль/л.
📜 Анамнез: акромегалия и макроаденома гипофиза (2019) — нерадикальная трансназальная аденомэктомия; с тех пор — ланреотид 120 мг раз в 28 дней, с октября 2025 добавлен каберголин 0,5 мг 2×/нед 💊.
🩸СД2 — 10 лет (пероральная терап…
🩺 Первичный гиперальдостеронизм: на что обратить внимание!
Первичный гиперальдостеронизм (ПГА) — одна из ключевых причин вторичной артериальной гипертензии (АГ), нередко маскирующаяся под резистентную гипертонию. По данным исследований, ПГА выявляют у 5–15 % пациентов с АГ — поэтому его нельзя упускать из виду.
🔍 Ключевые моменты для диагностики:
🔹В основе диагностики ПГА лежит определение концентрации альдостерон…
❤24👍7🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @endoclub360. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 315,530 of 1,629,372entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Клуб Эндокринолов (Endo-club 360)” (@endoclub360), 3,912 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/endoclub360.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.