Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Meow [.] Onion v2.0

@end_k

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,697subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002897218007
TypeChannel
Username@end_k
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 31 August 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/end_k

Growth

2,6932,6972,6957 August 2026 — 2,693 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,693 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,697 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,692–2,698 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 01:572,697+4
7 Aug 2026, 21:072,693no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:332,693first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 9 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 9 March 2026 to 18 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Mar 2026, 00:41 UTC≈1,590 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @nanvalueFile

Logs with digital signature Usage Example: init_db() log( event="user.login", target="user:123", from_="user:123", level="info" ) logs = get_logs_with_verification() for l in logs: print(l) By: @s4rrar / @nanvalue

1

18 Mar 2026, 00:41 UTC≈1,240 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @nanvaluePhoto

التوقيع الرقمي (Digital Signature) هو طريقة باستخدام التشفير لإثبات أن البيانات صحيحة ولم يتم تعديلها. كيف بشتغل: بتم إنشاء بصمة (Hash) للبيانات بتم تشفير البصمة باستخدام المفتاح الخاص بتم التحقق منها باستخدام المفتاح العام الفوائد: السلامة (Integrity): كشف أي تغيير في البيانات المصداقية (Authentication): إثبات مين اللي قام بالتوقيع عدم الإنكار (Non-repudiation): ما بقدر المرسل ينكر التوقيع وهاد بيضمن أنها الب

1

16 Mar 2026, 12:38 UTC≈1,000 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @nanvaluePhoto

الشفافية في عصر الذكاء الاصطناعي: كيف تعيد تقنية SynthID صياغة مفهوم الموثوقية الرقمية؟ في ظل الطفرة المتسارعة التي يشهدها مجال توليد الصور عبر الذكاء الاصطناعي، باتت الفجوة بين الواقع الرقمي والتمثيل الاصطناعي تتقلص إلى حد يصعب معه التمييز بالعين المجردة. ومن هنا، تبرز الحاجة الملحّة لبروتوكولات تقنية تضمن "الأصل الرقمي"، وهو ما تجسده شركة جوجل اليوم عبر تقنية SynthID. توضّح الصور المرفقة تجربة عملية لآلية عمل أنظ

9 Mar 2026, 03:28 UTC≈1,100 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔥 Types of Firewalls — The First Line of Cyber Defense 🛡️ Firewalls are the gatekeepers of your network, filtering traffic and blocking threats before they reach your system. Here are the main types every cybersecurity professional should know 👇 🔹 Packet-Filtering Firewall – Examines packets and blocks based on IP, port, and protocol. 🔹 Stateful Inspection Firewall – Tracks active connections for smarter filtering. 🔹

9 Mar 2026, 03:27 UTC784 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🐉 AI + Nmap in Kali Linux — Smarter Recon, Faster Insights 🤖🔍 Combine LLM helpers (e.g., llm-tools-nmap, Gemini CLI or similar assistants) with Nmap to get contextualized scan summaries, suggested follow-ups, and human-friendly recon notes — use the AI as a helper, not a replacement for verification. Always run scans in authorized, controlled labs. ⚡🛡️ #KaliLinux #Nmap #AIinSecurity #llmtools #Recon #PenTesting #Info

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @end_k. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 666,207 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Meow [.] Onion v2.0” (@end_k), 2,697 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/end_k.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.