Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

encmasuta

@encmasuta

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

9,663subscribers

+157 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002399548067
TypeChannel
Username@encmasuta
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/encmasuta

Growth

9,5069,6639,584.56 August 2026 — 9,506 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,509 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,579 subscribers11 August 2026 — 9,663 subscribers6 August 202611 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +157. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,482–9,687 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 21:349,663+84
9 Aug 2026, 06:459,579+70
6 Aug 2026, 11:409,509+3
6 Aug 2026, 08:199,506first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
63.4%
avg views ÷ 9,663 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,130
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.02%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held31 (29 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total190,060
Reactions total3,839
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 14:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
292
Videos
2
Links
236

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

3,505 reactions across 30 posts, in 41 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💩86824.8%
👍47413.5%
🤡40411.5%
3289.36%
🤣2326.62%
🔥1815.16%
🤬1624.62%
🤔1113.17%
🙉1093.11%
🤮782.23%
😱762.17%
👏722.05%
🤨681.94%
👎641.83%
🥱421.20%
😭371.06%
🍾310.884%
🖕230.656%
🤯230.656%
😁160.456%
21 further kinds1063.02%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,839reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 31 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @encmasuta. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 31 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 10:35 UTC≈1,950 views71 reactionsread 12 August 2026

稠州银行放出其万事达“外币数字卡”相关信息 稠州银行近日放出万事达外币数字卡相关信息,具体介绍如下: 稠州银行外币数字卡(VCN, Virtual Card Number)是稠州发行的虚拟万事达卡,无实体卡片,但具备线上支付所需的全部要素信息(16位卡号、有效期、CVV安全码),可在境外支持万事达卡的网站上直接支付。 该卡卡BIN为53061601,与此前万事达BIN表中的稠州银行卡BIN一致。 该卡为虚拟卡,无实体卡,可定制风控(消费国家/地区、交易笔数、交易限额、交易币种、有效期)、即时发卡、用后即废、保护主账户信息安全。 该卡目前支持下挂在稠州银行对私居民一类户、非居民(NRA)客户美元账户、NRA子账户下。 该卡面向对私账户单笔交易限额1000 USD,全年 50000 USD;面向对公客户暂无限制。 目前该卡冻结比例、货币转换费等进一步相关信息及开立步骤、条件等均未知,其运作模式可能类似建行“一账户多介质”,

👏54🤯8👍72

12 Aug 2026, 08:43 UTC≈2,380 views43 reactionsread 12 August 2026

汇丰澳大利亚关闭个人业务阶段性通知 https://www.hsbc.com.au/help/important-notices/ 今日,汇丰澳大利亚宣布了新通知,个人账户于今年内依旧可以正常使用,且没有显著规则变化。 对于卓越理财客户,汇丰宣布,无论是否达标,都将保持卓越状态直至2028年6月30日,且环球转账限额从每日10万美元升至40万美元。 后续进展将由汇丰澳大利亚继续跟进。

👍28🤯111🎃1👏1🥱1

11 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC≈3,540 views136 reactionsread 12 August 2026

工行不再收取异地外币存取手续费 本月起,中国工商银行不再收取异地账户的外币现钞存取款手续费,无论客户星级。 请注意:工行各分支行受理外币币种及面额不同,请在兑/取/存外币前先与网点确认。 感谢 NewChain 投稿

👍115💩9🤨5🤯4👏2💯1

11 Aug 2026, 07:52 UTC≈5,280 views190 reactionsread 12 August 2026

中行疑似暂停哔哩哔哩联名万事达借记卡开/领卡 中国银行多间分行(除上海分行)今日起暂停哔哩哔哩联名万事达借记卡新开(含提交非预制申请和开立预制卡)、制卡和领卡,部分网点指此限制为全行范围限制(除上海分行)。 已领卡卡片暂时不受影响。已提交但未制卡的非预制卡申请仍然有效,唯需待后续安排才会恢复制卡/领卡(也可能有其他举措,请以中行后续安排为准)。 感谢 生煎, 匿名读者 投稿

🙉109💩61😭11🤷‍♂72

10 Aug 2026, 11:22 UTC≈4,410 views138 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Tenpaygo风控变严,原因尚未知 据多例DP和频道编辑实测,目前Tenpaygo支付风控已明显变得异常严格,此前可正常付款的大部分商户在支付时均会提示: This service is experiencing high demand. Please try again later. 此服务目前很繁忙,请稍后重试。 且波及范围已经不仅限于明显用于套现用途个人码、商户码和第三方支付机构码牌,据多例DP报道,即便是部分正常商户甚至于较大型的正规商户(例如米哈游、巨人网络)等游戏点券充值亦无法支付。 经频道编辑实测,此风控限制与设备、账号、IP等均无明显指向性关系,大部分账号在更换商户后可立刻好转。

🤡100💩274🥱3🤬2🍌1👎1

10 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC≈3,990 views70 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Tenpaygo新版已改变地理位置信息授权提示,新版提示如下: Location Authorization Device location information is required for secure payment verification, and will not be used for any other purposes. 地理位置信息授权请求 设备地理位置信息是安全支付验证所必需的,且不会被用于任何其他目的。 相比旧版去除了“Tenpaygo仅在中国大陆可用”等相关提示语,但这仍不代表Tenpaygo可在海外使用。

🤣50👍8🤮4🤡31🍌1🖕1🥱1

8 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC≈5,040 views118 reactionsread 12 August 2026

旧闻:中银香港长者客户到汇丰、恒生ATM提款免收费 https://www.stheadline.com/zh-hans/investment/3594807/ 为响应《长者友善银行服务指引》,中银香港由即日(7月17日)起,凡该行年满65岁长者客户到汇丰、恒生自动柜员机(ATM)提款,豁免每次收费15元。换句话,现时不论「银通(JETCO)」或汇丰、恒生ATM网络,一共3,000部ATM,该行长者客户都可随意免费提款。该行料有过百万名长者客户受惠。 中银宣布,由即日起,持有中银卡且年满65岁或以上的长者客户,除可继续透过「银通」网络自动柜员机提款外,亦可于全港贴有「银联(UnionPay)」标志的自动柜员机(即包括汇丰和恒生的ATM在内)使用中银卡进行提款,无需缴付手续费,以提升长者客户使用基本银行服务的便利度。

👍94🥱13🤓5🤡42

8 Aug 2026, 02:26 UTC≈4,830 views88 reactionsread 12 August 2026

勘误:此卡已成年客户亦可办理学子卡,但需监护人(且要求监护人必须为直系亲属)代办,且校验监护人名下资产达标方可办理。 注:《民法典》第18条规定,成年人原则上是完全民事行为能力人,可以独立实施民事法律行为;而第28条规定,需要为成年人确定监护人的情形,针对的是无民事行为能力或者限制民事行为能力的成年人。也就是说,一个正常具有完全民事行为能力的成年人,父母、配偶等不会因为亲属身份自动继续成为他的“监护人”。 因此,此处引用的“监护人”说法应为“由家长代办”的意指。 感谢 Allen Yeager 投稿

💩76🖕9👎3

8 Aug 2026, 02:20 UTC≈4,710 views112 reactionsread 12 August 2026

据DP,虽并非“中银环球通万事网联世界卡”产品,属于纯人民币万事网联卡的产品矩阵,但此卡亦要求需白名单企业代发薪才可制卡。 未来,中行的白金、世界万事网联卡产品可能将长期仅允许海外代发薪客户批量开卡,或海外代发薪+资产达标客户独立开卡。 感谢 匿名用户 投稿

💩108💊4

8 Aug 2026, 02:10 UTC≈4,630 views127 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

招商永隆银行已修改该海报,删去扣账卡字样,改为提款卡。

💩101👎9🤪8🤡6😁2🤮1

7 Aug 2026, 00:41 UTC≈5,060 views61 reactionsread 12 August 2026

本网站近期更新: 1.新增香港所有有提款卡的持牌银行的提款卡 2.银行顺序改为按银行编号排序(渣打003,汇丰004......) 3.网页布局优化 4.所有“银联提款卡”按照币种已细分为港币/人民币/双币提款卡 5.优化hover popper体验和布局,悬停在部分场景的收费情况时,移动端也可看到popper了 6.完整对比表新增“免费口径”比较项,可选择只看完全免费的卡和所有免费的卡 7.更新了众安银行VISA扣账卡的取款收费数据

51🤡4🎄2👍2🥰1😁1

6 Aug 2026, 05:13 UTC≈5,130 views33 reactionsread 12 August 2026

香港金管局跨境支付通列表更新至截至7月20日版 香港金管局跨境支付通列表已更新至截至7月20日版本。此版本的列表新增了渣打银行,兴业银行香港分行。 目前,香港金管局名录上的跨境支付通的港方参与机构总数达到 26 家,内地参与行总数达 14 家(稠州银行暂未列于此表,如计入则为15家),分别为 香港 蚂蚁 中银 交银 东亚 信银 建亚 广发港分 招商港分 民生港分 集友 创兴 永隆 大新 象象 恒生 汇丰 工亚 兴业港分 Mox 南商 大众 上商 浦发港分 渣打 Wechat Pay HK 众安 内地 农业 中行 交通 中信 建设 光大 广发 招商 民生 富邦华一 工商 兴业 平安 浦发 (稠州*) *暂未列于香港金管局网站 #跨境支付通

25👍5🥱2🐳1

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @encmasuta. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@encmasuta edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 103,246 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“encmasuta” (@encmasuta), 9,663 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/encmasuta.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.