3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,904–1,905 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 00:34
1,904
-1
7 Aug 2026, 17:40
1,905
no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:18
1,905
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
20.1%
avg views ÷ 1,904 subscribers
Avg views / post
382
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 8 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
8 (14 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
2,677
Reactions total
322
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
11s
Average length
11s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
378 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
200
52.9%
❤🔥
68
18.0%
👍
48
12.7%
🔥
42
11.1%
🥰
12
3.17%
⚡
3
0.794%
👏
3
0.794%
😍
2
0.529%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 378reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Хотя васильки (род Centaurea) чаще ассоциируются с синим цветом, на лугу во второй половине лета значительно вероятнее увидеть василек розово-лиловой окраски. На фото 2 широко распространенных вида:
1. Василек шероховатый (он же василек скабиозовый, Centaurea scabiosa).
Довольно крупный (до 120 см), с жесткими шероховатыми стеблями. Листья перисторассеченные.
2. Василек луговой (Centaurea jacea)
Имеет более "скромны…
Цикорий обыкновенный (Cichorium intybus), как и ряд других распространенных видов из семейства Сложноцветные, зацветает во второй половине лето. Поэтому с одной стороны приятно любоваться его яркими соцветиями, но с другой стороны - это еще одно напоминание о том, что осень все ближе и ближе 🌸☀️
#цикорий #сложноцветные #ботаника #растения #травы #лекарственныерастения #encalypta #инулин
Одна из особенностей, которая помогает борщевику Сосновского -- его потрясающая семенная продуктивность. На одном растении во всех зонтиках вместе взятых может быть более 100 тысяч (!) плодов.
Соцветие борщевика называется "сложный зонтик".
🌸 Цветки (а потом и плоды) сидят на индивидуальных длинных "ножках", которые соединяются в одной точке. Получается простой зонтик или ЗОНТИЧЕК (📸фото №3).
☂️ Каждый зонтичек такж…
ОЛЕНИЙ МОХ, ЯГЕЛЬ и КЛАДОНИЯ. Три названия одного и того же явления. Обычно в разговоре ягелем/оленьим мхом называют кустистые лишайники рода Cladonia. Кладония - русскоязычная "калька" латинского названия, "олений мох" и "ягель" - тривиальные ("народные") названия некоторых видов рода.
Лишайники - это симбиотические организмы, их "тела" включают гифы грибов и водоросли. Грибной компонент определяет внешний облик л…
🌸🌼 Клематисы и княжики -- популярные садовые растения с разнообразными окрасками и жизненными формами. Но некоторых представителей этих родов можно встретить и в лесах России. Так, КНЯЖИК СИБИРСКИЙ (Atragene sibirica, в системе iNaturalist название Clematis alpina ssp. sibirica) встречается буквально по всей Сибири, Дальнему Востоку, Уралу и северу Европейской части России в таежных лесах, а также на каменистых склон…
В один из дней в лесу нам удалось увидеть мохноногого сыча (Aegolius funereus). Как водится, это был единственный день, когда я не взяла в маршрут фотоаппарат 😅 Но даже на фото и видео с телефона он хорошо виден на фоне еловых ветвей.
#совы #мохноногийсыч #биология #коми #тайга #ельник
На том же берегу Печоры, где мы бродили после ночи без сна в предвкушении сна хотя бы ночью следующей, был очень красочный лужок. Особенно ярко на нем выделялись клевер и нивяник. Нивяник часто называют "ромашкой", но это совсем другой род (фото 3 и 4) и в отличие от ромашек, у него маленькие зубчатые цельные листья, неветвящийся стебель и одно крупное соцветие-корзинка на верхушке стебля.
🌼🌼 Под ними желтел погрем…
❤40🥰9🔥7
Signed Antennaria_bot
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @encalypta. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,130,343 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Интересная ботаника @encalypta” (@encalypta), 1,904 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/encalypta.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
