Channel
@en9996
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
276subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002311561477 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @en9996 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/en9996 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:53 | 276 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 277 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:32 | 277 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 4 (3 August 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 606 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 08:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#北部分享 ☀️𝐒𝐮𝐦𝐦𝐞𝐫🌈🍀 #特價買一送一 🎉 感謝哥哥的信任 第一次喝茶 找莉莉安排 第一次的體驗感覺還不錯~~下次有機會在安排😘 🍀感謝你們一路的支持 越努力越幸運😘🍀 🤍🤩🤩一鍵進入莉莉小世界🤩🤩🤍 🌟 選妃頻道 🤩🤩 😘恩客客評 🌟 紅牌專區 🤩🤩 🌟 淫蕩少婦 🌟 新人喝茶 🤩🤩 🌟 生活の小碎片 🌟 甜妹基地 🤩🤩 🔞老濕機上車 📱@lii598 📱wh5576 ⭐nns888 🦋🦋🦋🦋📌🤍🤩🤩🤍📌🦋🦋🦋🦋 ⭐聊天入口： https://gleezy.net/888wesu ⭐北部專屬選妃：https://c.gleezy.top/Love885 ⭐️中部專屬選妃：https://c.gleezy.top/Love886 ⭐️南部專屬選妃 : https://c.gleezy.top/Love887 🔞老…
💯1
#中部分享 ☀️𝐒𝐮𝐦𝐦𝐞𝐫🌈🍀 第一次跟莉莉配合的恩客 出差來台中直接找莉莉安排 ❤️ 感謝 哥哥的信任 第一配合 玩的還不錯 🍀感謝你們一路的支持 越努力越幸運😘🍀 🤍🤩🤩一鍵進入莉莉小世界🤩🤩🤍 🌟 選妃頻道 🤩🤩 😘恩客客評 🌟 紅牌專區 🤩🤩 🌟 淫蕩少婦 🌟 新人喝茶 🤩🤩 🌟 生活の小碎片 🌟 甜妹基地 🤩🤩 🔞老濕機上車 📱@lii598 📱wh5576 ⭐nns888 🦋🦋🦋🦋📌🤍🤩🤩🤍📌🦋🦋🦋🦋 ⭐聊天入口： https://gleezy.net/888wesu ⭐北部專屬選妃：https://c.gleezy.top/Love885 ⭐️中部專屬選妃：https://c.gleezy.top/Love886 ⭐️南部專屬選妃 : https://c.gleezy.top/Love887 🔞老司機…
💯1
#北部分享 ☀️𝐒𝐮𝐦𝐦𝐞𝐫🌈🍀 #1+1🎉 謝謝新顆顆的支持和捧場~💓 等一次配合就約兩節 被信任是一種幸福 感謝所有的新舊顆顆們~ 一直以來的信任與支持 #顆顆們的肯定就給莉莉最大的動力~ 🍀感謝你們一路的支持 越努力越幸運😘🍀 🤍🤩🤩一鍵進入莉莉小世界🤩🤩🤍 🌟 選妃頻道 🤩🤩 😘恩客客評 🌟 紅牌專區 🤩🤩 🌟 淫蕩少婦 🌟 新人喝茶 🤩🤩 🌟 生活の小碎片 🌟 甜妹基地 🤩🤩 🔞老濕機上車 📱@lii598 📱wh5576 ⭐nns888 🦋🦋🦋🦋📌🤍🤩🤩🤍📌🦋🦋🦋🦋 ⭐聊天入口： https://gleezy.net/888wesu ⭐北部專屬選妃：https://c.gleezy.top/Love885 ⭐️中部專屬選妃：https://c.gleezy.top/Love886 ⭐️南部專屬選妃 : http…
💯1
#北部分享 ☀️𝐒𝐮𝐦𝐦𝐞𝐫🌈🍀 #1+1🎉 緣分讓我們相遇 交流讓我們熟悉 共事讓我們信任 真誠讓我們合作 被信任是很快樂的事 感謝哥哥的月初捧場開門紅😘 哥哥會把自己的需求 預算 提前跟莉莉說好 之前哥哥也約過2.3次但沒有很滿意 第一次找莉莉配合 哥哥就約到一個回約名單 真的很讚🥰🥰 🍀感謝你們一路的支持 越努力越幸運😘🍀 🤍🤩🤩一鍵進入莉莉小世界🤩🤩🤍 🌟 選妃頻道 🤩🤩 😘恩客客評 🌟 紅牌專區 🤩🤩 🌟 淫蕩少婦 🌟 新人喝茶 🤩🤩 🌟 生活の小碎片 🌟 甜妹基地 🤩🤩 🔞老濕機上車 📱@lii598 📱wh5576 ⭐nns888 🦋🦋🦋🦋📌🤍🤩🤩🤍📌🦋🦋🦋🦋 ⭐聊天入口： https://gleezy.net/888wesu ⭐北部專屬選妃：https://c.gleezy.top/Love885 ⭐️中部專屬…
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @en9996. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 107,360 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“恩客客評分享” (@en9996), 276 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/en9996.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.