9 Jul 2026, 19:37 UTC214 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo
time is an illusion only back pain is real
custom 519535911174250848715custom 51951479883301059728custom 53440060615462924367custom 51953015720656445552
Channel
пропаганда искусства
@emergencytz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
190subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002072649710 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @emergencytz |
| Description | хонга |
| Created | 8 December 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/emergencytz |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:02 | 190 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:50 | 190 | first reading |
Engagement
5 posts held, back to 8 December 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 6
- Videos
- 1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 1m 24s
- Average length
- 1m 24s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
157 reactions across 4 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 30 | 19.1% | |
| 😭 | 25 | 15.9% | |
| custom 5274227166702223891 | 21 | 13.4% | |
| custom 5195359111742508487 | 15 | 9.55% | |
| custom 5344006061546292436 | 12 | 7.64% | |
| custom 5199965863599415972 | 9 | 5.73% | |
| custom 5195147988330105972 | 8 | 5.10% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 4.46% | |
| 🍾 | 4 | 2.55% | |
| custom 5204420586498968512 | 3 | 1.91% | |
| 🆒 | 3 | 1.91% | |
| 🌚 | 3 | 1.91% | |
| 💋 | 3 | 1.91% | |
| custom 5195301572065644555 | 2 | 1.27% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 1.27% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 1.27% | |
| 🎅 | 2 | 1.27% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 1.27% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 1.27% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.637% | |
| 1 further kind | 1 | 0.637% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 157reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 8 December 2023 to 9 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
4 Jul 2025, 15:35 UTC544 views38 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo
👐
custom 527422716670222389121custom 51999658635994159729custom 53440060615462924365custom 52044205864989685123
26 Aug 2024, 20:30 UTC403 views40 reactionsread 8 August 2026
безумно благодарна каждому из вас, каждому, кто находился со мной рядом в этот насыщенный год! я никогда не перестану сомневаться в ваших возможностях и главное чтобы не сомневались вы!! безумно люблю свое общество, спасибо вам за присутствие в моей жизни 🤲🏻
❤21❤🔥5🍾3💋3🍓2⚡1🌚1🎅1
26 Aug 2024, 20:21 UTC981 views47 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video
could these be the real golden hours of our lives? мое время в этом городе подходит к концу и уже завтра я переезжаю. у меня есть много чего, что я могла бы сказать всем этим людям, но это видео и значимость этих кадров скажут все за меня
😭25❤9❤🔥2🌚2🐳2💘2🆒2⚡1
8 Dec 2023, 20:09 UTCviews —
Channel created
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @emergencytz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 720,106 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“пропаганда искусства” (@emergencytz), 190 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/emergencytz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.