Channel
@emcdworld
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,410subscribers
-353 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001340511293 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @emcdworld |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 19 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/emcdworld |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Oct 2026, 07:36 | 9,410 | -12 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 06:36 | 9,422 | -6 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 20:57 | 9,428 | +17 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 02:01 | 9,411 | +30 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 23:39 | 9,381 | -12 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 22:40 | 9,393 | -50 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 15:36 | 9,443 | -38 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 05:41 | 9,481 | -41 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 16:05 | 9,522 | -26 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:17 | 9,548 | -27 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:34 | 9,575 | -28 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 10:49 | 9,603 | -33 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 06:03 | 9,636 | -34 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 9,670 | -30 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:47 | 9,700 | -13 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:31 | 9,713 | -39 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:56 | 9,752 | -11 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:49 | 9,763 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:37 | 9,763 | first reading |
32 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 32 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
211 reactions across 30 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 62 | 29.4% | |
| 🔥 | 55 | 26.1% | |
| 👀 | 25 | 11.8% | |
| 👍 | 25 | 11.8% | |
| custom 5796694785615993734 | 17 | 8.06% | |
| ⚡ | 17 | 8.06% | |
| custom 5244595478657518370 | 10 | 4.74% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 239 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
CryptoQuant: Bitcoin’s bear cycle may be over 🌝 CryptoQuant founder Ki Young Ju says Bitcoin has moved out of its bearish market cycle, pointing to the company’s Bull-Bear Market Cycle Indicator. 🐂 The broader picture is turning bullish as well. CryptoQuant’s Bull Score Index jumped from 30 to 80 in a single week — its highest reading since October 2025 — with 8 of 10 underlying on-chain, market and valuation metri…
🔥3❤2👍2
It’s Dog Appreciation Day 🐾 A perfect excuse to celebrate the ones who make every day a little brighter, funnier, and more special just by being there. We’ve put together a few of our teammates’ dogs — along with the little things that make each of them so special. Swipe through to meet them, and show us your own four-legged favorite in the comments ❤️ 🔳 Community / Website / EMCD App / Twitter / Support
❤2🔥2
EMCD Mining Pool × Hashlabs 🤝 We're partnering with Hashlabs — a global Bitcoin mining infrastructure operator with facilities across Finland, Norway, Ethiopia, the US, and South America. 🏭 What this means for EMCD miners? Hashlabs' Brazil facilities now integrate with the EMCD pool — green hydro energy, ~$0.059/kWh rates, and direct connection to our infrastructure. ✔️ Stable hosting with competitive energy rate…
🔥4custom 57966947856159937342
Mining vs. AI: who gets the power? ⚡️ On August 27, Nicolás Rincón, Partnerships Manager at EMCD, will take the stage at Cripto Latin Fest in Bogotá for the panel: “Mining vs. AI: The War for the Planet’s Energy” Bitcoin mining and AI infrastructure are both becoming major energy consumers. The panel will get into some big questions: ♦️ How should available energy be used? ♦️ Where does each industry create the mos…
⚡2❤2custom 57966947856159937342
📰 What happened in mining last week EMCD Digest | August 3–9, 2026 ♦️ Hashprice rises 20% as Bitcoin rallies toward $80K Between Aug. 18 and 22, hashprice climbed from $31.80 to $38.29 per PH/s/day as Bitcoin rallied toward $80,000, giving miners some relief after months of pressure on margins. ♦️ CleanSpark, BitFuFu and Canaan post lower July output for a second month CleanSpark mined 586 BTC in July, down 5% from…
🔥2👀1👍1
Happy Bitcoin Infinity Day 🌝 ∞/21M — everything there is, divided by Bitcoin's fixed supply of 21 million coins. Swedish Bitcoin author Knut Svanholm coined the phrase in 2020 and gave August 21 — written 8/21 — its symbolic meaning a year later. ❤️ — if you’re celebrating with us 🔳 Community / Website / EMCD App / Twitter / Support
❤4
Some notifications are worth opening right away Like a daily payout from EMCD Mining Pool 😎 🔥 — I approve 🔳 Community / Website / EMCD App / Twitter / Support
🔥4
🏭 A mining partner should deliver value beyond the dashboard That starts with understanding your operation — and building an offer around it. Swipe through the cards to see how the EMCD Miner Support Program can support your mining operation through this challenging market cycle. To join: ➡️ Share details about your mining hardware and operation ➡️ Receive a custom offer tailored to your needs ➡️ Connect your hash…
❤4👍3
Imagine finding a valid Bitcoin block… only to hear: “Great work. The blockchain chose someone else.” 😄 That is an orphan race. It happens when two miners produce valid blocks almost simultaneously. Both branches compete until one accumulates more proof-of-work. The losing block becomes stale. March 24, 2026. AntPool and Foundry USA both found block 941,881 — twelve seconds apart, both valid. ViaBTC picked AntPoo…
custom 57966947856159937344⚡2
Power Salon: Mining × AI Data Centers 🔋 We're co-hosting a Bitcoin Asia side event in Hong Kong, and this one's worth being in the room for. ♦️ Friday, August 28 · 14:00–18:00 (GMT+8) ♦️ Soho House, Hong Kong ♦️ Hosted by EMCD × DMA As compute demand reshapes both industries — mining and AI data centers are converging around the same questions: power, site selection, hardware, long-term economics. Power Salon bri…
🔥4
📰 What happened in mining last week EMCD Digest | August 10-16, 2026 ♦️ Difficulty holds steady while hashrate eases Difficulty remained at 127.48 T after the August 8 adjustment, while the 7-day average hashrate fell about 2.3% to roughly 911 EH/s. USD hashprice also edged down to around $31.73 per PH/s/day, keeping mining margins tight ahead of the next difficulty adjustment expected around August 23. ♦️ Riot sig…
⚡2
Either way, we mine. Market up? We mine. Market down? One dramatic chart check — then we mine. All roads lead back to EMCD Mining Pool 🏭 Today’s mood: 🔥 — hodling ⚡️ — mining 👀 — watching from the sidelines 🔳 Community / Website / EMCD App / Twitter / Support
🔥3⚡2👀1
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @emcdworld. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“EMCD News” (@emcdworld), 9,410 subscribers as measured 15 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/emcdworld.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.