Channel
@emailingskills
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,347subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001358594887 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @emailingskills |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/emailingskills |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 3,347 | +1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 3,346 | +5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:44 | 3,341 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 3,343 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:10 | 3,346 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:55 | 3,349 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:01 | 3,348 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:59 | 3,348 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 23 April 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
302 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 123 | 40.7% | |
| 👍 | 90 | 29.8% | |
| 🔥 | 60 | 19.9% | |
| 😁 | 13 | 4.30% | |
| 🤔 | 8 | 2.65% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.662% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 0.662% | |
| 🤓 | 2 | 0.662% | |
| 😈 | 1 | 0.331% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.331% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 302reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 23 April 2024 to 21 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
“Чи можна вказувати deadlines у фолоап імейлах?” - найпопулярніше запитання про фолоапи. Не тільки можна, а й потрібно. Чомусь вважається, що вказати в імейлі конкретний дедлайн - це грубо та неввічливо. 🤔 Навпаки! Ви таким чином показуєте повагу до часу читача. Адже, знаючи терміни, можна планувати. 📍Хочете проявити ще більшу турботу чи сумніваєтеся, що завдання посильне за такий проміжок часу? Напишіть в кінці фо…
❤37👍21
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
Як же ж тоді писати фолоапи, що виглядав більш професійно? 1. Ще раз сформулюйте ваш запит. Так, усе настільки просто. Ще раз напишіть ваше питання чи прохання, без пасивної агресії (як от ASAP чи Looks like you’re busy..). Без дурних припущень в стилі "може мій імейл потрапив у спам" чи “може ви пропустили мій попередній імейл”. І без даунсайзінгу типу "чи тобі вдалося подивитися мій вчорашній імейл?" Тобто може …
🔥22👍15❤7
Photo, posted without a caption
❗️Завдання з🌟 як думаєте наскільки ефективний та ввічіливий такий фолоап? Чи стали би переробляти? якщо так, то як?
😁7
Вчора спонтанно підписалася я на одну панянку після цікавого reels і через пів хвилини приходить від неї ось таке. Ну і навіщо так було псувати про себе враження? Як думає, які 2 основні помилки вона зробила у своєму тексті? Ви відписуєте на такі повідомлення?
😁5❤1
Вчора Кріс Косик у своєму каналі порадила дуже круте відео про тексти (як писати просто та влучно, воно хоч і про маркетингові тексти більше, але і для робочих імейлів працюють ті самі принципи) https://youtu.be/TUMjnmfsPeM?si=yKZA5OSpPUqnZrbZ Ну і сама Кріс @kriskosyk класні речі у себе на каналі пише, дуже раджу підписатися.
❤21👍1
Найбільш challenging як виявилося 🔝
👍21🔥11❤1
Ось акроніми, які зустрічать в імейлах та месенджерах мало не щодня. Усі знаєте?
👍11😱2😈1
Ще одна абревіатура для месенджерів. Знаєте? Використовуєте?
🤔3❤2👍2🤓2
Ось так досі пишуть, аж не віриться🤦♀️ Що саме не так з цим апдейтом? 👎 Summary: We keep on working in the [X] project and doing our best to meet the deadline at the end of August. Some tasks are completed, and some are still in progress. We are facing some challenges with getting content on time, but we hope to overcome them soon. Tasks Completed: - Worked on the UI and the contact section Tasks In Progress: - Red…
👍5😁1
Якщо ви пишете/читаєте стільки project status updates скільки я, то вам точно згодиться https://uppr.com.ua/downloads/details/guide_to_fine-tune_your_status_updates Зібрала усе, що наболіло))
❤14🔥5👏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @emailingskills. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bullshit-free emails” (@emailingskills), 3,347 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/emailingskills.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.