Channel
@elzodxon
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
2,200subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001215185132 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @elzodxon |
| Created | 24 May 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/elzodxon |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:14 | 2,200 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:37 | 2,202 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:45 | 2,204 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 21 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @elzodxon. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 April 2026 to 7 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Alifbo o'zgarsa, ko'pchilik yozishga qiynaladi, buni ovozli xabar orqali aytilganini Aisha orqali matnga o'girib bersak, odamlarni ancha hayoti yengillashadi. Masalan-da.
Signed Elzodxon Sharofaddinov
🎉 Kichik yangilikcha Biz Voice Agent, TTS (Text-To-Speech), va STT (Speach-To-Text) modellar quryabmiz. O'zbek tilida ravon, aksentlarsiz, tiniq va tezkor modellar halicha yo'q. Code-switching va shunga o'xshash qiziq muammolar bor. Biz Elzodxon bilan birga AIsha ovozli modelini yaxshilab, keyingi bosqichda AI Lab qurish ustida ishlaymiz. Agent Inference + Voice Agents = Cooking something. Qiziquvchilar bo'lsa ema…
Signed Elzodxon Sharofaddinov
30 mln UZS for the best startup ideas: Techstars Startup Weekend Comes to Nukus 🚀 From June 26 to 28, Nukus will host the first-ever Techstars Startup Weekend Nukus Ideathon. It’s a great opportunity to turn your idea into a profitable business. In just 54 hours, you can: • Build a team and build your first product (MVP) • Join workshops on hypothesis testing and business modeling using Techstars methodology • Get…
Signed Elzodxon Sharofaddinov
File, posted without a caption
Signed Elzodxon Sharofaddinov
Tong hali to‘liq yorishmagan, shahar ko‘chalarini mayin shabada kezib yurgan paytda, eski bog‘ chetidagi supada yolg‘iz o‘tirgan chol uzoq ufqqa termulardi. Uning nigohida yillar og‘irligi, ko‘nglida esa aytilmagan so‘zlarning sokin iztirobi bor edi.
Signed Elzodxon Sharofaddinov
Video message, posted without a caption
Signed Elzodxon Sharofaddinov
Elon aka Cursorni sotib olishga qadam qo'yibdi.
Signed Elzodxon Sharofaddinov
SpaceX IPO orqali $85,7 mlrd jalb qilibdi. Hozir kompaniya $2 trillion baholanyapti. Qiziq tomoni, kompaniyaning yillik tushumi taxminan $19 mlrd atrofida. Ya'ni bozor uni 100x+ revenue multiple bilan baholagan. Albatta, SpaceX oddiy kompaniya emas. Investorlar bugungi biznesni emas, balki Starlink, kosmik infratuzilma va kelajakdagi boshqa yo'nalishlarni sotib olayotgan bo'lishi mumkin. Lekin baribir 100x revenu…
Signed Elzodxon Sharofaddinov
Yangi macbook olish VS VPS. Orada macbook olish haqida o'yladim, keyin muammoni qidirishni boshladim. Muammo esa oddiy, coding qilayotgda mac'im qotishni boshlagandi. Keyin muammoga yechim qidirishni boshladim, Mac'ni upgrade qilish yoki VPS'da coding qilish. Keyin VPS'im bor edi, unga claude'ni o'rnatdim va doimiy qiladigan ishlarimni qildim. Qarabsizki muammo hal. AI agentlar kechasiyu-kunduzi ishlay oladi. Qay…
Signed Elzodxon Sharofaddinov
Yuqoridagi kabi postlarni yozib bormoqchiman, qanday fikrdasiz?
The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Signed Elzodxon Sharofaddinov
So'nggi vaqtlarda CLI'da yashayabmiz desa ham bo'ladi. Oldinlari fancy UI'lar bilan ishlagan bo'lsak, hozir hamma narsa bitta cli'da yoki input orqali javob olish imkoniyatini beryabdi. Ya'ni odamlar shunchalik dangasalashyabdi, yo'q vaqtini qadriga yetishni o'rganyabdi, hamma narsani bitta yerda yozish orqali javob olyabdi. Aytaylik, sayohatga chiqmoqchisiz, AI'ga cli orqali so'raysiz, man 3-4 kunga boshqa shahar…
Signed Elzodxon Sharofaddinov
Claude code/Codex/Cursor va boshqa AI tool'larni o'rganish uchun $1000 li kurslarni olayotganlarni tushunmay o'tib ketsam kerak. Odatda biror yangi funksiya chiqsa, yoki yangi tool chiqsa, shunchaki o'zlari chiqargan qo'llanma va blog postlar orqali o'rganib chiqaman va qo'llab ko'raman. Hozirgi kunda judayam ko'plab odamlar dangasaligi, yetarlicha ambitsiyasi bo'lmagani uchun, biror yangi tool'ni o'rganish uchun …
Signed Elzodxon Sharofaddinov
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @elzodxon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Yuqoridagi kabi postlarni yozib bormoqchiman, qanday fikrdasiz?
The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2026 to 7 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 154,648 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Elzodxon Sharofaddinov” (@elzodxon), 2,200 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/elzodxon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.