Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

kadirova.el

@elyakadir

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,701subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001111971732
TypeChannel
Username@elyakadir
Created16 September 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/elyakadir

Growth

3,6993,7023,700.56 August 2026 — 3,702 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,702 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,699 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,701 subscribers3,7016 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,699–3,702 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 05:033,701+2
9 Aug 2026, 14:153,699-3
6 Aug 2026, 04:323,702no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:063,702first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 8 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.4%
avg views ÷ 3,701 subscribers
Avg views / post
830
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held23 (8 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total12,445
Reactions total412
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 22:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

659 reactions across 18 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5190468664410789696659100.0%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 721reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC226 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

«Ни Мессия, ни приближенные ангелы никогда не посчитают для себя унизительным быть рабами Аллаха. А тех, кто посчитает для себя унизительным поклоняться Ему и проявит высокомерие, Он соберет к Себе вместе.» (4:172)

custom 519046866441078969620

7 Aug 2026, 12:09 UTC324 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Когда мы искренне задаемся какими то вопросами, Аллах дает нам ответ Порой некоторые вопросы страшно задавать самим себе

custom 519046866441078969632

7 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC342 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026

«Цель этой жизни - осознать величие Господа и свою собственную ничтожность и нужду перед Ним. Цель состоит в том, чтобы вывести себя из центра и поместить туда Его. Но Facebook увековечивает иллюзию прямо противоположного этому. Он укрепляет мою веру в то, что из-за моей важности и значимости каждое мое несущественное движение или мысль должны быть выставлены напоказ. Внезапно то, что я съел на завтрак или купил в пр

custom 519046866441078969627

1 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC810 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Одна из величайших причин, побуждающих человека оставить грехи, это любовь к Аллаху. Однако порой можно увидеть человека, который говорит, что любит Аллаха, и, возможно, его глаза наполняются слезами при упоминании о Нём. Но при этом эта любовь не удерживает его от ослушания и не ограждает от греха. Причина заключается в том, что пользу приносит лишь та любовь, которая соединена с возвеличиванием и глубоким почтени

custom 519046866441078969639

24 Jul 2026, 17:49 UTC≈1,030 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Среди иудеев есть такие, которые переставляют слова со своих мест и говорят: «Мы слышали и ослушаемся» и «Послушай то, что нельзя слушать» и «Заботься о нас». Они кривят своими языками и поносят религию. А если бы они сказали: «Мы слышали и повинуемся» и «Выслушай» и «Присматривай за нами», то это было бы лучше для них и вернее. (4:46)

custom 519046866441078969627

23 Jul 2026, 21:31 UTC≈1,030 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 519046866441078969623

23 Jul 2026, 21:29 UTC946 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://apps.apple.com/ru/app/%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%80-%D1%80%D1%83/id6762196945

17 Jul 2026, 21:44 UTC≈1,270 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вааляйкумуссалям варахматуЛлахи вабаракатух Беречь свою фитру и быть правдивыми. Очень важен контакт с самими с собой, иначе в такой омут самообмана влипнете, что будет очень тяжело выбираться. Ну а это только с Аллахом возможно Поэтому что? Правильно. Познаем Аллаха, но не зубрежкой и тупо учебой ради учебы. Нет. С осмыслением, с практикой.

custom 519046866441078969630

17 Jul 2026, 21:37 UTC990 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Здравствуйте Я поняла, что всю свою жизнь прожила в страхе, и этот страх пропитывал все, даже мою религию. Искажая все настолько, что даже вера для тебя становится страданием. Ты думаешь, что ты практикуешь свою религию, что ты такая молодец, но твоя грудь сдавлена, ты пропитана постоянной тревогой и сомнениями. Я поняла, что такое доброе мнение об Аллахе. Ты уже не напрягаешься, чтобы из себя его выдавить. Ты не с

custom 519046866441078969641

17 Jul 2026, 21:27 UTC809 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сложно сказать. Могу предположить, что иман уже не тот, потому что глаза, уши потребляют колоссальное количество запретного. Если это так, напишите, интересно как вы думаете. Старайтесь меньше смотреть на запретное и попробуйте посещать места, где собираются для поминания Аллаха, для получения знаний. Путь приближения к Аллаху - познание Аллаха и Его Книги. Можно начать с этого. Ищите, действуйте. Пусть Аллах помо

custom 519046866441078969633

17 Jul 2026, 21:20 UTC≈1,070 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Здравствуйте Я довольно долго в исламе, и поняла одно, когда иман падает, в первую очередь, нужно заставить свое сердце и свой язык обратиться к Аллаху. В любом положении. Просто обратиться к Нему и попросить искренне, чтобы Он помог и все исправил. Поговорить с Ним. Разговаривайте с Аллахом. С людьми мы готовы часами болтать, а со своим Создателем не можем и двух слов связать. Мы в Его Руках. После искреннего р

custom 519046866441078969642

17 Jul 2026, 21:10 UTC769 viewsread 7 August 2026

Поступил вопрос анонимный, вспомнила про эту функцию. Если что пишите, буду рада. Ответ насчет поддержания родственных связей. Вы не обязаны поддерживать связь с этой девушкой, она не ваша родственница. А с двоюродным братом тоже свои нюансы, он вам не махрам, поэтому уточните у знающих в какой форме должно быть поддержание родственных связей с ним. Я не могу ответить.

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @elyakadir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 182,212 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“kadirova.el” (@elyakadir), 3,701 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/elyakadir.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.